A process is described for reducing the oxygen content of a high-oxygen feedstock. The process is particularly suitable for biomass-based feedstocks. The process comprises contacting the feedstock with carbon monoxide and/or coke in the presence of a catalyst. Conveniently, the coke may be present in the form of a deposit on the catalyst. Carbon monoxide may be generated in a regeneration step of the catalyst. The process may be carried out in conventional refinery equipment.
|
1. A process for reducing the oxygen content of a high-oxygen feedstock, said process comprising the step of contacting the high-oxygen feedstock with carbon monoxide and/or coke at a temperature in the range of 250-550° C., wherein said high-oxygen feedstock comprises ligno-cellulosic biomass and/or bio-oils derived therefrom.
18. A process for the production of a biomass-derived fuel, said process comprising the steps of:
a) converting a biomass material comprising cellulose and/or ligno-cellulose into a conversion product comprising oxygen; and
b) contacting at least a portion of said conversion product with carbon monoxide and/or coke to thereby reduce the oxygen content of at least a portion of said conversion product and produce said biomass-derived fuel, wherein said biomass-derived fuel comprises a bio-oil having an oxygen content less than the oxygen content of said conversion product.
5. The process of
7. The process of
8. The process of
9. The process of
12. The process of
14. The process according to
15. The process according to
16. The process according to
17. The process according to
20. The process according to
21. The process according to
22. The process according to
23. The process according to
25. The process according to
26. The process according to
27. The process according to
29. The process according to
30. The process according to
|
This application claims priority to PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2008/064003, filed Oct. 16, 2008, which claims the priority benefit of European Patent Application No. 07118777.7, filed Oct. 18, 2007, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to a process for reducing the oxygen content of high-oxygen feedstocks, and more particularly to the conversion of bio-oil components to hydrocarbon fuels.
2. Description of the Related Art
Increasingly, renewable resources are being studied as replacements for fossil fuels. In particular biomass materials are being looked at as a source for liquid fuels for internal combustion engines.
Liquid fuels obtained from crude oil consist predominantly of hydrocarbons and aromatics. The constituents are almost exclusively carbon (C), and hydrogen (H), and little or no oxygen. Conversion products from biomass invariably comprise significant amounts of oxygen. Ligno-cellulosic biomass and bio-oils derived therefrom typically have an oxygen content of at least 20% by weight, and sometimes as high as 50% by weight. The energy content of these materials is accordingly much lower than that of fossil fuels.
It is necessary to upgrade biomass-derived fuels by reducing their oxygen content. Techniques that have been proposed thus far include cracking, for example fluid catalytic cracking (FCC); hydro-cracking; hydro-treating; and hydro-deoxygenation. What these techniques have in common is that much of the oxygen removal relies on the reaction of oxygen with hydrogen to form water. The hydrogen is either supplied externally, or is consumed from the biomass feedstock. Externally supplied hydrogen is expensive, and adds significantly to the cost of biomass-derived fuels. If no external hydrogen is supplied the hydrogen content of the biofuel is reduced during the cracking process, which lowers the energy content of the fuel.
Thus, there is a particular need for a process for reducing the oxygen content of a high-oxygen feedstock that has a reduced hydrogen consumption as compared to existing processes.
There is a further need for a process that may be carried out in existing plant available in oil refineries.
The present invention addresses these problems by providing a process for reducing the oxygen content of a high-oxygen feedstock, said process comprising the step of contacting the high-oxygen feedstock with carbon monoxide and/or coke at a temperature in the range of 100 to 300° C.
Another aspect of the invention comprises a method for carrying out the inventive process in standard refinery equipment.
The features and advantages of the invention will be appreciated upon reference to the following drawings, in which:
The following is a description of certain embodiments of the invention, given by way of example only and with reference to the drawings.
In reactor 102 biomass material 101 is mixed with a particulate catalyst 105, and a fluidizing gas 103. The fluidizing gas 103 may be inert, or it may be a reducing gas, such as comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide. Conveniently the gas could be flue gas from regenerator 111, which is rich in CO.
The temperature of the catalyst particles 105 and the fluidizing gas 13 is such that the temperature in reactor 102 does not exceed 200° C. It will be understood that biomass material 101 typically contains water, which will be driven off by fluidizing gas 103. The amount of water present in biomass material 101 is an important factor in determining the temperature in reactor 102, and must be taken into account when calculating the energy balance for reactor 102.
After the biomass material 101 and the catalyst particles 105 have become thoroughly mixed in reactor 102, the mixture 104 is transferred to fluid cracker 106. A second stream 107 of catalyst particles is introduced at this point. Catalyst stream 107 is hot, so as to maintain a cracking temperature in fluid cracker 20 of from 250 to 550° C., preferably from 350 to 450° C.
The cracking reaction taking place in fluid cracker 106 reduces the oxygen content of the feedstock. If CO is present in the fluidizing gas, at least part of the oxygen reduction proceeds via the following reaction:
CaHbOc+d CO→CaHbOc−d+d CO2 (1)
To the extent that deoxygenation is the result of this reaction it does not involve the consumption of hydrogen.
From fluid cracker 106 the reaction mixture 108 is transferred to product/catalyst separator 110 (e.g., comprising cyclones and a stripper). Product is condensed in product recovery unit 109, producing product stream 113. The catalyst particles, which are covered with coke (a by-product of the fluid cracking reaction) are sent to regenerator 111. In regenerator 111 an oxygen containing gas (e.g., air, or an oxygen/steam mixture) is admitted, to burn off the coke. The amount of oxygen and the temperature in regenerator 111 are controlled so as to maximize the amount of carbon monoxide in flue gas 103. This gas is piped to reactor 102. Regenerated catalyst particles 112, which are hot and, in this embodiment, virtually coke free (e.g., less than 0.2% coke by weight of the catalyst) are recycled in part to reactor 102, and in part to fluid reactor 106. The split is controlled so as to obtain the desired temperatures in each of reactor 102 and fluid reactor 106.
CaHbOc+e C →CaHbOc−2e+e CO2 (2)
For convenience the coke is depicted as elemental carbon, although it may contain small amounts of hydrogen.
It will be readily appreciated that the use of carbon monoxide in the flue gas and the residual coke on the catalyst particles permits a significant reduction in the oxygen content of the feedstock, without requiring the consumption of hydrogen.
To a large extent, conventional refinery equipment may be used for the process of the present invention. For example, 106, 110 and 111 can be the riser, the stripper and the regenerator of a conventional FCC unit.
Any high-oxygen feedstock may be used as feed 101. The feedstock may be liquid or solid. Examples of suitable liquid feedstocks include bio-oils and components of bio-oils. The term “bio-oil”, as used herein, refers to liquid product resulting from a chemical treatment of a solid biomass. The chemical treatment may be pyrolysis, cracking, hydrotreatment, and the like.
Suitable examples of solid feedstocks include solid biomass materials, in particular biomass materials containing cellulose and/or ligno-cellulose. Examples include wood particles, straw, corn husks, bagasse, and other forms of forestry or agricultural waste materials.
Solid biomass materials may be fed directly into reactor 102 in the form of small particles. Fluidizing gas 103 carrying catalyst material 105 or 105a provides intimate mixing of the catalyst material and the solid biomass.
In an alternate embodiment, catalyst material 105 or 105a is brought into intimate contact with solid biomass material in a pre-treatment step (not shown) prior to introduction into reactor 102. Solid biomass may be brought into intimate contact with catalyst particles by mechanical processes, such as grinding, milling kneading, and the like. Such processes are disclosed in more detail in our pending patent application PCT/EP2007/054377, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. It will be appreciated that the presence of coke on the surface of the catalyst particles may act as a lubricant, thereby enhancing the penetration of the catalyst particle into the biomass particle.
It will be appreciated that the catalyst particles used in this pre-mixing step may be much smaller than the catalyst sizes customary for use in FCC processes. The latter are in the mm range, whereas for this pre-mixing step the catalyst particles have an average particle size in the range of from 50 nanometers to 40 micrometers, preferably from 150 to 500 nanometers. These catalyst particles are recovered from the product stream as “fines”, and recycled to the pre-mixing step.
Accordingly, the process for deoxygenation of solid biomass may comprise two catalyst streams: a first catalyst stream comprising catalyst particles having an average particle size the range of from 50 nanometers to 40 micrometers, preferably from 150 to 500 nanometers, which is mixed with a solid biomass in a mixer positioned upstream of reactor 102, and which is recovered from the product stream in separator 109; and a second catalyst stream comprising catalyst particles suitable for fluidized beds (i.e., in the mm range), which is recovered from regenerator 111 (with or without a coke residue) and recycled into 102 and 106. The chemical composition of the two catalyst streams may be the same or different, with the understanding that, even if the same catalyst is used in both stream, the catalyst particles of the second stream will usually contain a binder.
Examples of suitable catalytic materials include clays, silicas, silica-aluminas, magnesia, magnesia-alumina, magnesia-silica-alumina, manganese compounds, lime, transition metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal hydroxyl salts, zeolites, cationic layered materials, anionic clays, layered double hydroxides (LDHs), smectite clays, saponites, and mixtures thereof.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4304649, | Aug 25 1980 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of | Solubilization of lignocellulosic materials |
7199278, | Jul 30 2004 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | Conversion of oxygenates to olefins |
7273960, | Oct 25 2002 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | Fluid bed oxygenates to olefins reactor apparatus and process of controlling same |
7829751, | Oct 27 2006 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents, Inc. | Processes for converting oxygenates to olefins using aluminosilicate catalysts |
8022002, | Mar 24 2009 | UOP LLC | Integrated regeneration of non-noble metal catalysts |
8207385, | Aug 16 2006 | MARD, INC | Fluid catalytic cracking of oxygenated compounds |
20040064006, | |||
20070293695, | |||
20090026112, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 01 2007 | KIOR INC | BIOECON B V | LICENSE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034365 | /0882 | |
Nov 01 2007 | BIOECON B V | KIOR INC | LICENSE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034141 | /0823 | |
Oct 16 2008 | KiOR, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 22 2010 | O CONNOR, PAUL | KIOR, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024169 | /0009 | |
Jan 26 2012 | KIOR, INC | 1538731 ALBERTA LTD , AS AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027689 | /0151 | |
Jul 22 2014 | KIOR, INC | KFT TRUST, VINOD KHOSLA, TRUSTEE, AS FIRST LIEN AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST | 033390 | /0423 | |
Dec 11 2014 | BIOECON B V | BIOECON INTERNATIONAL HOLDING N V | LICENSE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035391 | /0973 | |
Sep 01 2015 | KIOR, INC | KiOR, LLC | NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036717 | /0262 | |
Mar 14 2016 | KiOR, LLC | Inaeris Technologies, LLC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038380 | /0344 | |
Aug 27 2018 | Inaeris Technologies, LLC | MARD, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 054213 | /0032 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 05 2017 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jun 03 2021 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 03 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 03 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 03 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 03 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 03 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 03 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 03 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 03 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 03 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 03 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 03 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 03 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |