A method is taught to extract more information about the motion of an acoustic wave emitter moving relative to a line array of hydrophones that are part of a sonar system by determining the variation in doppler shift across the entire line array of hydrophones together with the a range measurement of the emitter to calculate the emitter's velocity.
|
1. A method of determining the velocity of an underwater object moving parallel to an underwater line array of a plurality of N equally spaced acoustic sensors that are part of an active sonar system comprising:
making contact with the underwater object with a narrow band continuous wave pulse from the active sonar system at a frequency f0;
determining the range R of the object from the line array with a shorter pulse from the active sonar system centered at a frequency f0, wherein the time duration of the pulse is shorter than the time duration of the first narrow band continuous wave pulse;
receiving a frequency fN at every acoustic sensor of the line array of N acoustic sensors;
calculating the frequency shift (TN−f0) for each of the N individual acoustic sensors of the line array of N acoustic sensors;
plotting a line of frequency shift versus acoustic sensor for the measured doppler shifts of a plurality of interior acoustic sensors to allow for confirmation of any difference in frequency using a linear least squares fit of the frequency shifts and to determine whether there is a measurable variation in the doppler shift of the entire line array;
calculating the variation in doppler shift of the entire line array of N acoustic sensors, based on the frequency shift of the first acoustic sensor and the Nth acoustic sensor of the line array of N acoustic sensors, expressed as
and
determining the velocity of the underwater object according to the equation
wherein c is the speed of sound in water and wherein Δθ is equal to the length of the line array of N acoustic sensors divided by the range R of the underwater object.
2. The method of
3. The method in
4. The method in
|
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefore.
Not applicable.
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to active sonar systems, and more specifically to a novel method of processing the Doppler shift from a line array of acoustic sensors to determine the speed of an acoustic wave emitter moving parallel to the line array.
(2) Description of the Prior Art
Certain sonar applications utilize the properties of Doppler effects to analyze the data obtained from acoustic wave receivers. The Doppler effect or Doppler shift expresses the apparent change in the frequency and wavelength of an acoustic wave perceived by an acoustic receiver that is moving relative to the source of the acoustic wave. This relative motion can be caused by the movement of the emitter, the receiver or both the emitter and the receiver. For example, a receiver having velocity νr relative to a source having velocity νs introduces a Doppler shift as follows:
The Doppler shift can be derived for a plane wave from a stationary source having a pressure field of the form p(x,t)=P0ei(ωt-kx). A stationary receiver at x=0 measures the field p(x,0)=P0eiωt, while a receiver moving according to x=−νt, i.e., opposite to the propagation direction of the plane wave, measures the field p(x,t)=P0ei(ω+ων/c)t=P0eiωt(1+ν/c).
The Doppler effect produces a frequency shift when an object emitting acoustic waves is moving relative to an acoustic receiver such as a hydrophone. In the context of a sonar system, the Doppler effect is typically used only to determine the speed of the emitter along the line connecting the emitter and the receiver. When a line array of multiple receivers is used, however, there is the potential for extracting more information about the velocity of the emitter.
It is a general purpose and object of the present invention to determine the actual velocity of a moving acoustic wave emitter as detected by a line array of hydrophones.
This object is accomplished by a method of determining the Doppler shift across the entire line array of hydrophones through the use of a narrow band continuous wave pulse at a known frequency directed at a moving acoustic wave emitter, and then using the variation in the Doppler shifts across the multiple hydrophones in the array together with the a range measurement of the emitter to calculate the emitter's velocity.
A more complete understanding of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereto will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring now to
where c is the speed of sound in water, f1 is the frequency received at x1 and f2 is the frequency received at x2, so that Δf1=(f1−f0) and Δf2=(f2−f0). The above equations (1)-(3) can be calculated by the sonar system 14.
The Doppler shift varies linearly across the individual hydrophones (1 to N) of the line array 10. This is also true for the general case in which the moving object 12 is not aligned at all with any part of the array as illustrated in
where Δθ=θ1−θ1. The above equations (4)-(6) can be calculated by the sonar system 14.
In active sonar, f0 is known. The distance or range R from the object 12 to the line array 10 can be determined with a short non-continuous wave pulse. In the situation where R is much larger than the length of the line array 10, (x1−x2), then the value of De can be calculated according to the following:
The equation (7) can be calculated by the sonar system 14.
Note that the range R of the object 12 is approximately the same for each element (1 to N), since as stated above the aperture length of the line array 10 is small compared to R. A line array has N hydrophones spaced λ/2 apart. Each hydrophone experiences a different frequency shift Δfz that varies linearly, based on its position on the line array 10. This results in the measurement of N different Doppler frequency shifts which is a significant data sample size. Since all of the frequency shifts must fit to a line in a plot of frequency shifts versus individual hydrophone array elements as illustrated in
In the situation where the line array 10 is not long enough to get a measurable difference in Doppler shifts, a synthetic aperture can be formed as the line array 10 moves to get enough length to obtain a reliable measurement.
If there is any motion of the object 12 normal to the line array 10, this will lead to a competing effect involving the variation of the Doppler shift due to that motion. However, this effect is much smaller. For the same velocity v, the Doppler shifts at the left and right most elements of the array are respectively:
Since θ<<1, then θ2<<θ, so the difference in Doppler shift from the left or right most elements compared to the center element is much smaller due to the motion normal to the line array. However, this can also be accounted for with a least squares fit.
In active sonar, both the range, R, and the Doppler shift, Δfx=(fx−f0), are directly measureable by the sonar system 14. This enables the measurement of the velocity parallel to the line array 10, assuming that the variation in Doppler shifts, Δf2−Δf1/f0, along the line array 10 is measurable (either using the aperture length itself, or forming a synthetic aperture). For active sonar, the procedure involves first making contact with an object 12 with the line array 10 by pinging on it with a narrowband continuous wave pulse at a frequency f0. A shorter pulse is used to estimate the distance R. A sufficient amount of data is acquired to estimate the Doppler shift. For example, if the Doppler shift is 1 Hz, approximately 1 second of continuous wave time series data is needed for resolution of the Doppler shift. The Doppler shift is then determined at the two end elements x1 and x2 of the line array 10. Measured Doppler shifts at the interior elements allow for confirmation of the estimate of any difference in frequency (by fitting them to a line, e.g., with a least-squares fit), leading to improved accuracy.
The advantage of the present invention over the prior art is that in sonar, normally, the motion of an object parallel to a line array can only be detected when the object moves from one beam to another. The present invention provides a much faster and more accurate way to measure the velocity of an object parallel to the line array.
In light of the above, it is therefore understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10577923, | Mar 20 2015 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Leak detection via doppler shift differences in moving hydrophones |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2912671, | |||
3423754, | |||
3427617, | |||
3436721, | |||
6229761, | Sep 17 1999 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Estimating ship velocity through the water and over the ground |
20100039899, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 03 2011 | RUFFA, ANTHONY A | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE | CONFIRMATORY LICENSE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026423 | /0338 | |
Jun 07 2011 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 29 2018 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 16 2018 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 17 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 17 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 17 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 17 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 17 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 17 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 17 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 17 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 17 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 17 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 17 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 17 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |