A textured thin film transistor is comprised of an insulator sandwiched between a textured gate electrode and a semi-conductor. A source electrode and drain electrode are fabricated on a surface of the semi-conductor. The textured gate electrode is fabricated such that a surface is modified in its texture and/or geometry, such modifications affecting the transistor current.
|
1. A thin film transistor comprising:
an insulator;
a semiconductor;
a textured gate electrode, wherein the textured gate electrode includes a plurality of dried metal droplets spaced from each other on a plane gate surface in a form of microscopic bump texturing;
a source electrode; and
a drain electrode,
wherein the insulator is sandwiched between the semiconductor and the textured gate electrode.
9. A method for fabricating a textured thin film transistor comprising:
forming a textured gate electrode, wherein the step of forming the textured gate electrode includes assembling the textures in a self-assembly process, and wherein the self-assembly process includes texturing by metal buckling to form corrugations;
forming an insulator layer;
forming semiconductor layer, wherein the semiconductor is deposited over the source electrode and the drain electrode; and
forming a source electrode and drain electrode.
14. A method for fabricating a textured thin film transistor comprising:
forming a textured gate electrode, wherein the step of forming the textured gate electrode includes texturing by providing a plurality of metal droplets spaced from each other to a plane gate surface and allowing the metal droplets to dry on the plane gate surface, wherein microscopic bump texturing is achieved;
forming an insulator layer;
forming semiconductor layer; and
forming a source electrode and drain electrode;
wherein the metal droplets on the plane gate surface are arranged in at least one of a “polka dot” pattern or a random arrangement, and wherein the metal droplets are arranged in a varying density over the plane gate surface.
2. The thin film transistor according to
3. The thin film transistor according to
4. The thin film transistor according to
5. The thin film transistor according to
6. The thin film transistor according to
7. The thin film transistor according
8. The thin film transistor according to
10. The method according to
11. The method according to
12. The method according to
13. The method according to
15. The method according to
16. The method according to
17. The method according to
|
The present application is directed to the configuration of semiconductor based devices and more particularly to configuring semiconductor based devices such as Thin Film Transistors (TFTs) with an increased current flow.
A typical existing TFT structure 100 is shown in
Thin film transistors (TFTs) based on non-crystalline semiconductors are of interest for a number of uses including but not being limited to large area electronics. In some of these implementations TFTs are employed as access switches, such as for electronic based pixel configurations. For these and other uses it is preferable to have a fast turn on of the TFTs to improve access speed. It is understood that the turn on speed of TFTs may be increased by increasing currents in the TFTs.
In order to attain higher currents in existing TFTs structures, there are two passive approaches. The first is to increase the aspect ratio of the TFTs. In one instance, the aspect ratio may be increased by increasing channel width, which is at the cost of parasitic capacitance. The second approach to increase the aspect ratio would be to reduce channel length. The second passive approach to attain higher currents is to increase the dielectric capacitance. If the dielectric coefficient remains unchanged this is accomplished by making the dielectric thin. Such an approach comes with the cost of creating pinholes in the device structure.
It is therefore considered beneficial to provide a TFT configuration that improves the current flow as a way to achieve fast TFT turn on, and which overcomes at least some of the issues in existing approaches.
A textured thin film transistor is comprised of an insulator sandwiched between a textured gate electrode and a semiconductor. A source electrode and drain electrode are fabricated on a surface of the semiconductor. The textured gate electrode is fabricated such that a surface is modified in its texture and/or geometry, to thereby affect the transistor current.
Turning now to
It is to be understood the method of forming the textured TFT of
It is to be appreciated and is shown in
By this arrangement, when textured gate 206 is set to some potential, the conductive surface of textured gate 206 requires the charge to distribute un-equally such that convex edges 402 have a higher charge density compared to plane regions 406, and concave edges 404 have a lower charge density compared to plane regions 406. Thus, the electric field normal to and just above convex edges 402 are higher compared to plane regions 406, and the electric field normal to and just adjacent to concave edges 404 are lower compared to plane regions 406. Equivalently, the potential just above convex edges 402 decrease more rapidly compared to plane regions 406, and the potential just adjacent to concave edges 404 decrease less rapidly compared to plane regions 406.
Attention is now directed to
Having described the concepts of corrugated TFTs attention is now turned to comparing the operation of such TFTs to TFTs using a plane gate electrode. Therefore, both plane gate TFTs and corrugated gate TFTs were fabricated using hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) technology. The dielectric was 150 nm thick, with the a-Si:H semiconductor being 50 nm. First a planar gate metal layer of 100 nm of Mo—Cr was patterned. For the corrugated gate TFTs, an additional 100 nm of Ti—W was patterned as corrugations over the base Mo—Cr gate metal. A stack of 200 nm Si—N, 150 nm a-Si:H were then deposited with 70 nm n+ doped a-Si:H at the source-drain contacts. The gate dielectric vias were then patterned and etched after which 200 nm of Mo—Cr was deposited and patterned for source-drain contacts. The electrodes and n+ a-Si:H were etched in unwanted regions, and a-Si:H semiconductor islands were patterned. Both corrugated and planar gate TFTs were fabricated on the same wafer.
Measurements of the fabricated TFTs were then made. For example,
The reason for faster turn on of the corrugated gate TFTs is believed to be due at least in part to the influence of the concave edge on the surface potential prior to channel formation. Prior to channel formation, the surface potential varies with the applied gate voltage as most of the induced charges fill the deep and band tail states with a negligible amount of charge present as free carriers. In the case of the corrugated gate TFT, the surface potential over the concave edge is higher for a given gate voltage as compared to the plane gate (as shown in for example in
The reason for the higher mobility-capacitance product in the corrugated gate TFT is believed to be due at least in part to the influence of the convex edge after channel formation. After channel formation the surface potential is almost fixed as any further increase in the gate voltage only brings more free carriers to the semiconductor-insulator interface. Consider, as shown in
The texture (e.g., corrugations) influence the performance in other ways as well. First, the presence of corrugations results in the semiconductor having a corrugated feature itself thereby increasing the effective channel width of the TFT to W(1+2h=s), where W is the channel width of the plane gate TFT. Second, the effective capacitance per unit area in the plane gate TFT differs from the corrugated gate TFT. Using the cylindrical capacitor approximation of the previous discussion, the effective capacitance per unit area can be shown to be approximately
where ∈ the permittivity, t is the dielectric thickness. Since s is >>(h; t), both the variations in channel width and capacitance are negligible.
It is to be appreciated that while the foregoing has primarily identified the textured surface of the gate as being corrugated by the use of ridges (or stripes), other geometric shapes and arrangements are equally applicable to the present concepts. For example,
Turning to
It is to be understood the method of forming the textured TFT 1800 of
Thus fabrication methods according to the present concepts create raised conductive surfaces. If these surfaces have high curvature, there are two physical situations that occur simultaneously. First, the gate dielectric becomes thinner (if the dielectric does not perfectly conform) in the raised regions, second, the high curvature reflects a high charge density in the semiconductor. Both of these situations effectively add together to create a percolation path from the source to drain.
The methods described herein for fabricating TFTs with a textured gate electrode is implemented by any of a number of known fabrication techniques such as, but not being limited to ink jet printing, gravure printing, photo-lithography, self-assembly by metal “wrinkling” or “buckling”, self-assembly using a “coffee stain effect”, microscopic bump like texturing obtained by providing metal droplets to a surface of a plane surface, such as a plan gate surface and allowing the metal droplets to solidify on the plane surface, among others. It is also to be understood the insulator layer of the TFT structure can be formed by use of a number of known insulator deposition techniques (e.g., Physical Vapor Deposition, Chemical Vapor Deposition, Sputtering, Beam Deposition, etc.). Such techniques being capable of controlling insulator thickness, including insulator thickness along the vertical (or sloped) faces of the textured gate. The insulator thickness, including the thickness along the vertical (or sloped) faces the gate affecting gate current. For example, a thinner insulator can enhance gate current, and is therefore a consideration particularly in low voltage operation situations, such as in some embodiments 10 v to 4 v, or lower.
Thus, as shown, modification of the gate texture and geometry modifies the on currents of the textured TFTs. While the concave edges are likely responsible for the lower turn on voltage, the convex edges are likely responsible for the higher mobilities. An aspect to consider when employing texture is the higher leakage currents. It is also possible that the textures cause more charge trapping
It will be appreciated that variants of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be combined into many other different systems, methods or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Street, Robert A., Sambandan, Sanjiv
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5229310, | May 03 1991 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | Method for making a self-aligned vertical thin-film transistor in a semiconductor device |
5691782, | Jul 08 1994 | Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. | Liquid-crystal display with inter-line short-circuit preventive function and process for producing same |
6242304, | May 29 1998 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Method and structure for textured surfaces in floating gate tunneling oxide devices |
6331465, | May 29 1998 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Alternate method and structure for improved floating gate tunneling devices using textured surface |
6476441, | May 29 1998 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Method and structure for textured surfaces in floating gate tunneling oxide devices |
6706597, | May 29 1998 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method for textured surfaces in floating gate tunneling oxide devices |
20020094594, | |||
20050127367, | |||
20070032091, | |||
20070105396, | |||
20070182675, | |||
20080026532, | |||
20090161438, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 29 2011 | STREET, ROBERT A | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026528 | /0872 | |
Jun 30 2011 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 30 2011 | SAMBANDAN, SANJIV | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026528 | /0872 | |
Apr 16 2023 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Xerox Corporation | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF US PATENTS 9356603, 10026651, 10626048 AND INCLUSION OF US PATENT 7167871 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 064038 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT | 064161 | /0001 | |
Apr 16 2023 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Xerox Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 064038 | /0001 | |
Jun 21 2023 | Xerox Corporation | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 064760 | /0389 | |
Nov 17 2023 | Xerox Corporation | JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 065628 | /0019 | |
Feb 06 2024 | Xerox Corporation | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 066741 | /0001 | |
Feb 06 2024 | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Xerox Corporation | TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT RF 064760 0389 | 068261 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 29 2014 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 19 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 29 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 01 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 01 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 01 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 01 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 01 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 01 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 01 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 01 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 01 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 01 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 01 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 01 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |