A semiconductor memory may be provided with a built-in test mode that is accessible through a password protection scheme. This enables access to a built-in test mode after manufacturing, if desired. At the same time, the password protection prevents use of the built-in test mode to bypass security features of the memory.
|
5. An apparatus, comprising:
an integrated semiconductor memory device comprising:
a memory array;
a random number generator configured to provide a random number;
a test mode decoder coupled to the random number generator and configured to store a test mode sequence for implementing a built-in test mode and a test mode set-up sequence for configuring a password of the integrated semiconductor memory device, said test mode decoder configured to selectively implement a password protected access to said built-in test mode for said integrated semiconductor memory device using a code derived from the password and the random number.
1. An apparatus, comprising:
an integrated semiconductor memory, comprising:
a controller configured to control a built-in test mode;
a memory array coupled to said controller;
random number generator coupled to said controller and configured to provide a random number; and
a test mode decoder coupled to said controller and said random number generator and configured to store a test mode sequence for implementing the built-in test mode and a test mode set-up sequence for configuring a password of the integrated semiconductor memory, said test mode decoder configured to implement a password protection access to said built-in test mode based on the password and the random number.
4. The apparatus of
6. The apparatus of
7. The apparatus of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
This relates to semiconductor memories.
Semiconductor memories, such as flash memories, may include a built-in test mode. The built-in test mode may be utilized by the manufacturer to conduct tests prior to distribution of the product. The built-in test mode may also be utilized subsequently, upon return of the part to the manufacturer, to analyze product failures.
Generally, the built-in test mode may be implemented by writing parameters to a test mode decoder to facilitate certain operative tests. These tests are generally run in what is called an engineering work station which has a receptacle for receiving the memories under test and for applying test parameters to those memories. The engineering work station also collects the results of the tests and provides the analysis of the results in order to determine whether the parts are operating correctly.
In accordance with some embodiments, a built-in test mode may be accessed after manufacture only through a password protected scheme. Basically, after manufacturing and delivery of the memory to the customer, the customer may program a password into the memory. That password controls access to the built-in test mode thereafter.
Then, when a product is returned to the manufacturer, the manufacturer can only access the built-in test mode if the manufacturer receives, from the customer, the password needed to access the built-in test mode.
Thus, upon purchasing the device, the customer can write a password which controls built-in test mode access thereafter. The manufacturer and all other users of the memory would have no idea what the password is and, therefore, could not access the built-in test mode.
It may be desirable to control access to the built-in test mode because security features of the memory might be bypassed through the built-in test mode. Nonetheless, it may still be desirable to enable use of the built-in test mode, upon password access, for example, to allow the manufacturer to analyze why parts were working improperly.
Embodiments may be utilized in a variety of semiconductor memories including volatile and non-volatile memories. For example, electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), flash memories, including both NOR and NAND flash, phase change memories, dynamic random access memories, and static random access memories may be used, to mention a few examples.
Referring to
The memory array 16 may be accessed by a memory controller 12 which, in some embodiments, may be part of an integrated semiconductor memory 10. The memory controller 12 may also be accessed by test mode decoder 14. The test mode decoder 14 or test mode interface allows access to built-in test modes controlled by the memory controller 12. Alternatively, the test mode may be entered by forcing an internal signal to change from the normal operating mode. A configuration memory 17 that may be external to the array 16, may store information about the configuration of the memory 10. The memory 17 may be a non-volatile memory. A random number generator 19 may generate a random number used by the customer to encrypt a password.
In accordance with some embodiments, the configuration memory 17 may be programmed also with a special key, such as a double word password. The password programming can be checked by the device at power on to be sure that the device is correctly configured, that the password was written, and the test mode access configuration is also valid. This check may be necessary because after the integrated circuit is fabricated, the manufacturer cannot know the configuration of the device that might possibly be test mode password protected with an unknown password. If a complicated and longer key is also stored in a special part of the configuration memory 17, the probability of having a non-accessible device is very low.
Conventionally, the users of the memory 10 may access the built-in test mode by writing to registers of the configuration memory 17 (also called a POR sector). The configuration memory 17 stores configuration information for the memory. The configuration memory 17 may also store the information needed to access the built-in test mode after the password has been programmed.
The test mode decoder 14 may, in some embodiments, also store a test mode sequence 24 that implements the test mode and a test mode set up sequence 18. The sequences 18 and 24 may be software executed by a processor-based system such as the controller 12 or the decoder 14. Alternatively, the sequences may be implemented in hardware or firmware.
Conventionally, the memory 10 may be coupled to a test apparatus 46 that applies test signals to the memory 10 under test (MUT), as shown in
In the set up sequence 18, the various parameters to set up the configuration of the memory 10 may be programmed, as indicated in block 20 in
Then, to implement the test mode, a check at diamond 26 in
If the password is provided or the device is not password enabled, the various parameters to implement the test mode may then be received, as indicated in block 30. These parameters provide the tests that will be implemented and the data that is necessary to implement the tests, as is conventional in built-in test mode sequences.
In some embodiments, once the password has been provided, the memory 10 is thereafter no longer password protected. In other words, once the password is received, the password protection feature is effectively disabled. In some embodiments, a more elaborate encryption technique may be utilized. Basically, a random number may be used to further encrypt the password. A function may be defined that sets an encrypted code. The encrypted code is a function of a random number generated by the memory and the password established by the customer.
Then, when the manufacturer needs to access the device, the manufacturer obtains the random number from a random number generator on board the memory. The manufacturer then sends the random number to the customer. The customer forwards a password encypted with the random number. The manufacturer can then access to the test mode of the device using the encoded password. The manufacturer may, in some embodiments, reset the test mode protection and may not need the password thereafter.
Thus, in some cases, the customer may grant the manufacturer access to the test mode by giving a password to the manufacturer. The manufacturer, in some cases, may have to calculate an unlock key, which is a function of the password in a random number. In this way, the customer may keep the password secret by only giving the encrypted password. In other cases, if the password is the same for all of the customer's devices, the customer may use a random number generated by the device to encrypt the password. Where the password is different from device-to-device, it may not matter that the manufacturer gains access to the password and, therefore, the simpler technique may be utilized.
However, in other cases, it may be possible to reinstitute the password or to institute a new password upon provision of the existing password.
References throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one implementation encompassed within the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrase “one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be instituted in other suitable forms other than the particular embodiment illustrated and all such forms may be encompassed within the claims of the present application.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
La Malfa, Antonino, Messina, Marco
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4310720, | Mar 31 1978 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Computer accessing system |
| 4882752, | Jun 25 1986 | Computer security system | |
| 5210571, | Sep 26 1991 | Xerox Corporation | System for servicing electronic printers and printing systems |
| 5388156, | Feb 26 1992 | LENOVO SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Personal computer system with security features and method |
| 5506396, | Feb 09 1993 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Microcomputer for IC card |
| 5719387, | Mar 29 1995 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | IC card including a memory, a password collating means and an access permitting means for permitting access to the memory |
| 6085337, | Sep 21 1998 | Infineon Technologies AG | Method and system for reliably indicating test results during a self-check operation |
| 6094724, | Nov 26 1997 | Atmel Corporation | Secure memory having anti-wire tapping |
| 6401198, | Mar 09 1999 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | STORING SYSTEM-LEVEL MASS STORAGE CONFIGURATION DATA IN NON-VOLATILE MEMORY ON EACH MASS STORAGE DEVICE TO ALLOW FOR REBOOT/POWER-ON RECONFIGURATION OF ALL INSTALLED MASS STORAGE DEVICES TO THE SAME CONFIGURATION AS LAST USE |
| 6681304, | Jun 30 2000 | SK HYNIX NAND PRODUCT SOLUTIONS CORP | Method and device for providing hidden storage in non-volatile memory |
| 6731536, | Mar 05 2001 | Infineon Technologies LLC | Password and dynamic protection of flash memory data |
| 6892322, | Oct 26 2000 | MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC | Method for applying instructions to microprocessor in test mode |
| 7099906, | Oct 12 2001 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Random bit sequence generator |
| 7395434, | May 01 2002 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Method for secure storage and verification of the administrator, power-on password and configuration information |
| 7441169, | Dec 16 2002 | Renesas Electronics Corporation; NEC Electronics Corporation | Semiconductor integrated circuit with test circuit |
| 7519873, | Jun 11 2004 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Methods and apparatus for interfacing between test system and memory |
| 7702984, | Jan 06 2000 | Super Talent Electronics, Inc | High volume testing for USB electronic data flash cards |
| 7730368, | Oct 31 2003 | WODEN TECHNOLOGIES INC | Method, system and computer-readable code for testing of flash memory |
| 7788553, | Feb 12 2004 | Super Talent Electronics, Inc | Mass production testing of USB flash cards with various flash memory cells |
| 7873837, | Jan 06 2000 | Super Talent Electronics, Inc | Data security for electronic data flash card |
| 8276185, | Jan 19 2005 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Enhanced security memory access method and architecture |
| 20030018939, | |||
| 20030084307, | |||
| 20040025027, | |||
| 20040071028, | |||
| 20050044222, | |||
| 20050229065, | |||
| 20060059398, | |||
| 20060161725, | |||
| 20060282734, | |||
| 20070192828, | |||
| 20080147964, | |||
| 20080189557, | |||
| 20090125683, | |||
| 20090307411, | |||
| 20090307502, | |||
| 20100043078, | |||
| 20110068907, | |||
| 20130014215, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Nov 22 2008 | MESSINA, MARCO | NUMONYX B V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024601 | /0517 | |
| Nov 22 2008 | LA MALFA, ANTONINO | NUMONYX B V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024601 | /0517 | |
| Dec 02 2008 | Micron Technology, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Sep 30 2011 | NUMONYX B V | Micron Technology, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027075 | /0682 | |
| Apr 26 2016 | Micron Technology, Inc | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038669 | /0001 | |
| Apr 26 2016 | Micron Technology, Inc | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REPLACE ERRONEOUSLY FILED PATENT #7358718 WITH THE CORRECT PATENT #7358178 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038669 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST | 043079 | /0001 | |
| Apr 26 2016 | Micron Technology, Inc | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 038954 | /0001 | |
| Jun 29 2018 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Micron Technology, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047243 | /0001 | |
| Jul 03 2018 | MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047540 | /0001 | |
| Jul 03 2018 | Micron Technology, Inc | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047540 | /0001 | |
| Jul 31 2019 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051028 | /0001 | |
| Jul 31 2019 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Micron Technology, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051028 | /0001 | |
| Jul 31 2019 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Micron Technology, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050937 | /0001 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Aug 22 2014 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Mar 08 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Mar 15 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Sep 23 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 23 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 23 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Sep 23 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Sep 23 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 23 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 23 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Sep 23 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Sep 23 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 23 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 23 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Sep 23 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |