A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement including a tool having one or more fluid outflow ports that exhaust fluid during normal operation of the tool. A feedback arrangement in operable communication with the fluid exhausted from the one or more fluid outflow ports during operation of the tool. The feedback arrangement interacting with exhausting fluid to produce a signal receivable at a remote location indicative of proper tool operation. A method for confirming operation of a downhole tool is included.
|
6. A method for confirming operation of a downhole tool comprising:
disposing an oscillator within one of first and second reservoirs in the tool and within a fluid outflow path between the first and second reservoirs;
actuating the tool by engaging a dog with a selected downhole location thereby causing fluid to flow in the outflow path;
actuating the oscillator solely with the fluid to oscillate within the one of first and second reservoirs; and,
creating a signal with the oscillator representative of engagement of the dog with the selected downhole location.
8. A method for confirming operation of a downhole tool comprising:
disposing a rotatable pulser within one of first and second reservoirs in the tool and within a fluid outflow path between the first and second reservoirs;
actuating the tool by engaging a dog with a selected downhole location thereby causing fluid to flow in the outflow path;
rotating the rotatable pulser solely with the fluid; and,
creating a signal with the rotatable pulser representative of engagement of the dog with the selected downhole location;
wherein actuating the rotatable pulser includes causing a pressure variation in fluid downstream of the pulser to create a fluid propagated acoustic signal.
3. A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement comprising:
a tool having first and second reservoirs and one or more fluid outflow ports that exhaust fluid between the first and second reservoirs; and
a rotatable pulser disposed within one of the first and second reservoirs and having one or more openings therein in operable communication with the fluid exhausted from the one or more fluid outflow ports during operation of the tool, the one or more openings being angularly positioned relative to a rotatable axis of the pulser such that fluid flowing past the pulser will cause the pulser to rotate, the pulser interacting with exhausting fluid to produce a signal receivable at a remote location.
1. A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement comprising:
a tool having a mandrel, a sleeve, at least one dog mounted relative to the mandrel and sleeve for radial extension and retraction, first and second reservoirs disposed between the mandrel and the sleeve, and one or more fluid outflow ports configured to exhaust fluid between the first and second reservoirs; and
the feedback arrangement including an oscillator disposed within one of the first and second reservoirs and in operable communication with fluid flow of the fluid exhausted from the one or more fluid outflow ports during relative movement between the sleeve and mandrel, the oscillator interacting with exhausting fluid to cause the oscillator to oscillate to produce a signal receivable at a remote location indicative of engagement of the at least one dog at a selected downhole location, the oscillator including a spring mass that oscillates in response to fluid flow therepast to cause a vibration in the tool and a string supporting the tool.
2. A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement as claimed in
4. A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement as claimed in
5. A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement as claimed in
7. A method as claimed in
9. A method as claimed in
10. A method as claimed in
11. A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement as claimed in
|
In drilling and completion industries such as hydrocarbon exploration and production, Carbon Dioxide sequestration, etc., tools are often run into the downhole environment for particular purposes requiring locating the tool at a target position. Traditionally an operator will keep track of a length of tubing in the hole and anticipate the specific tool at issue locating upon a feature within the hole. The feature may be a seat, profile, bottom, etc. Such “gauging” of where the tool is occurs in trips into the borehole, trips out of the borehole and movements of the tool in defined areas of the borehole.
For example, an operation in a borehole may require several actions taking place between a downhole most location and an uphole most location for the particular operation. Providing profiles at these locations will provide a guide to the operator to keep the target tool in the target location for the job being done.
While such measures are currently used, tools do not always engage profile properly and effective indication of position at the surface may not be received. Such situations result in lost time, which translates to cost increases.
In order to address the foregoing, a downhole position locating device with fluid metering feature (U.S. Pat. No. 7,284,606, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference) was developed. Such a tool or others that function by providing a fluid movement component of their operation, which fluid component has an effect on tool operation such as in the '606 patent wherein the fluid delays an action until the fluid is removed by exhaustion or by movement to another chamber are useful as landing in a sought profile is better verifiable by a pull or push from surface that allows for a slower movement of the string. While the concept generally works well, there is a possibility that the tool experiences restricted movement due to friction, Blow Out Preventer (BOP) contact or other impediments rather than due to an engagement with a profile and fluid movement. In such case, the indication of tool location at surface would be inaccurate. Since accuracy in downhole operations improves efficiency and reduces costs, the industry will well receive improved arrangements supporting these goals.
A downhole tool with a feedback arrangement including a tool having one or more fluid outflow ports that exhaust fluid during normal operation of the tool; and a feedback arrangement in operable communication with the fluid exhausted from the one or more fluid outflow ports during operation of the tool, the feedback arrangement interacting with exhausting fluid to produce a signal receivable at a remote location indicative of proper tool operation.
A method for confirming operation of a downhole tool including disposing an oscillator within a fluid outflow path; actuating the tool thereby causing fluid to flow in the outflow path; affecting the oscillator with the fluid; and creating a signal with the oscillator representative of tool operation.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
It is to be appreciated that while the overall configuration of the metering tool of the '606 patent is utilized to illustrate two embodiments of the disclosed invention, other configurations where fluid movement is a part of the function of the tool will also benefit from the embodiments providing feedback as described herein.
Referring to
Upper body 140 has three grooves 44, 46, and 48. These grooves are deep enough so that when legs 28 and 30 are in them, outer surface 50 of dogs 24 recedes inside of window 22. In this manner the tool 10 can pass an obstruction going downhole and can be removed after release going uphole. If an obstruction is encountered by surface 32 going in the hole, the spring 40 is compressed as the sleeve 20 and dogs 24 stop downhole motion. Continued downhole movement of the mandrel 100 not only compresses spring 40 but also positions grooves 44 and 46 in alignment with legs 28 and 30 of dogs 24 to allow them to retract to a position closer to the central axis 52 and within sleeve 200. At that point the obstruction can be passed and spring 40 can bias the sleeve 200 back into the neutral position shown in
Between the sleeve 200 and mandrel 100 an upper fluid reservoir 56 (
The fluid system is operative to create a delay as the dogs 24 are in the desired location and a force is applied to the mandrel 100 to create a surface signal for such engagement prior to the release of the dogs 24 from the locating groove (not shown). In the exemplary embodiments further described herein, the feedback arrangement is further provided features to produce an oscillating or pulsating signal that is more easily discernible at a remote location. The system also serves to allow a reduction of the applied pulling force before release to reduce the slingshot effect from release. When used with the optional pressure relief device 70 the tool can be inverted and can be used to apply a load in a predetermined range on a BHA without concern for premature release, such as an offshore drilling application where a heavy compensator system is employed.
When the desired depth is reached, the tool is pulled up until the surface 34 engages a desired locating groove downhole. At that point, further upward pulling on the mandrel 10 from the work string (not shown) will force fluid from reservoir 58 to reservoir 56 through restrictor 66. This regulates the rate of movement of mandrel 100 as the force is being applied to give surface personnel the time to notice a signal that the desired groove has been engaged and a force that well exceeds the potential drag force from friction of slip/stick effects on the work string in a deviated wellbore are applied. The rig crew can then actually lower the applied pulling force before the actual release happens to reduce the slingshot effect from the release. Release occurs after the mandrel 100 moves a sufficient distance to place grooves 46 and 48 in alignment with legs 28 and 30 to allow the dogs 24 to retract and the tool to be returned to the
The use of the check valve 68 allows the tool to quickly find its neutral position after a release so that the test can be quickly repeated, if desired. The use of the restrictor 66 allows more time at the surface to hold a force before release and further allows lowering the applied force after the passage of time but before release to reduce the slingshot effect from release. The pressure relief device 70 allows application of force for any desired time without fear of release if the force is kept at a level where the relief device remains closed. The fluid used on the reservoirs can be a liquid or gas. The compensator is an optional feature. The tool is serviceable in the well in opposed orientations depending on the intended service. Although four dogs 24 are illustrated one or more such dogs can be used. Biasing of springs 26 and 40 can be accomplished by equivalent devices.
In the embodiment of
In another embodiment, referring to
While the foregoing embodiment provides one method for propagating a signal based upon the structure shown, there is another that provides for much less of a time delay. This utilizes the actual work string the tool is disposed in to propagate a vibratory signal. Because the pulser, in addition to what it does as noted above, will also cause pressure variations in the tool that is exhausting fluid, the string itself experiences varying strain that is cyclic. A cyclic change in tensile strain can function as a signal. More specifically, and using the metering tool of the '606 patent as an example, as the tool contacts a locating profile, applied tension displaces fluid through the outflow ports and past the pulser. The flow of fluid rotates the pulser thereby restricting and unrestricting the flow of liquid through the ports. This variance in restriction results in a variance of the pressure within the tool chamber. The variance in chamber pressure in the tool will be manifested as a variance in force between the metering tool and the profile. This force variation is detectable as a variance in tensile force in the workstring upon which the tool has been run and operated. The signal provides increased confidence that the tool 10 is operating properly. One benefit of this embodiment is the speed at which a signal will propagate through metal as opposed to a fluid. In view of this speed increase, the signal is received virtually contemporaneously with the tool actuation.
While one or more embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10072493, | Sep 24 2014 | BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS LLC | Hydraulic injection diagnostic tool |
10370922, | Jun 26 2013 | Impact Selector International, LLC | Downhole-Adjusting impact apparatus and methods |
9631445, | Jun 26 2013 | Impact Selector International, LLC | Downhole-adjusting impact apparatus and methods |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3191537, | |||
3532174, | |||
3768576, | |||
4291395, | Aug 07 1979 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Fluid oscillator |
5117398, | Apr 11 1990 | Well communication pulser | |
5158142, | Jun 27 1991 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus for releasing a pipe string from an object stuck downhole by continuously applying tension to said apparatus |
5831934, | Sep 28 1995 | PETROL INTERNATIONAL INC | Signal processing method for improved acoustic formation logging system |
6206101, | Jun 07 1996 | Bakke Technology AS | Method and device for facilitating the insertion of a coiled tube into a well and for loosening stuck objects in a well |
6540025, | Nov 30 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Hydraulically metered travel joint method |
7249633, | Jun 29 2001 | BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS LLC | Release tool for coiled tubing |
7281575, | Oct 30 2003 | Impact Selector International, LLC | Field adjustable impact jar |
7284606, | Apr 12 2005 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole position locating device with fluid metering feature |
7423932, | Apr 12 2006 | Well bore communication pulser | |
8162078, | Jun 29 2009 | CT ENERGY LTD | Vibrating downhole tool |
20070056771, | |||
20080156536, | |||
20080271923, | |||
20080302528, | |||
20110198126, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 10 2010 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 12 2010 | O MALLEY, EDWARD J | Baker Hughes Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 025164 | /0569 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 12 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 22 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 28 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 28 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |