A method of electron microcopy passes an electron beam through a phase plate, specifically a Zernike type phase plate, comprising a central hole, and a thin film causing a phase shift of the electrons passing through said film. This phase shift causes the contrast Transfer Function (CTF) to change from a sine-like function to a cosine-like function. The phase plate is equipped with a film in the form of an annulus, carried by a much thinner film. As a result only in a small spatial frequency range (for low frequencies) the phase is changed (and thus the CTF), and for other spatial frequencies the phase shift is negligible, and thus the CTF remains unchanged. Due to the much smaller thickness of the carrier film the scattering of electrons is negligible as well.
|
1. A method of imaging a sample in a charged particle beam system, the method comprising:
directing a beam of electrons through a sample, wherein a passage of the beam of electrons through the sample causes deflection of some of the electrons in the beam;
passing the beam of electrons from the sample through a phase plate having three regions and a holder structure, wherein the three regions comprise a first region, a second region, and a third region, and wherein:
the first region comprises a central area causing a first phase shift of electrons;
the second region comprises a first thin film surrounding and bordering the central area, the first thin film causing a second phase shift of electrons different from the first phase shift,
the holder structure surrounds the first thin film and supports the three regions; and
the third region comprises at least one further thin film between the first thin film and the holder structure, the at least one further thin film causing a further phase shift of electrons different from the first phase shift and the second phase shift, and
wherein the first thin film and the at least one further thin film are formed as concentric annuli, the annulus forming the further thin film surrounding and bordering the annulus forming the first thin film, the center of the annuli coinciding with the middle of the central area; and
combining the electrons that pass through the three regions to form an image having improved contrast.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
|
This Application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/896,103, filed May 16, 2013, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 61/650,584, filed May 23, 2012, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a phase plate for an electron microscope, the microscope generating a beam of electrons, said beam of electrons passing through a sample, the beam of electrons after passing through the sample divided in an undiffracted beam and a diffracted beam, the sample imaged in an image plane where the undiffracted and the diffracted beams interfere to form an image, the phase plate placed in a plane where the undiffracted and the diffracted beam are focused, the phase plate comprising:
Such a phase plate is known from “Phase Contrast Enhancement with Phase Plates in Biological Electron Microscopy”, K. Nagayama et al., Microscopy Today, Vol. 18 No. 4, July 2010, pages 10-13, further referred to as Nagayama [-1-], and is also known as a Zernike phase plate.
In a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) a sample is imaged by passing a beam of energetic electrons with a selectable energy of, for example, between 40 keV and 400 keV, through the sample. For so-called weak-phase samples, such as biological samples, most electrons pass through the sample while some electrons are elastically or inelastically scattered, the elastically scattered electrons forming diffracted beams. The image is formed by interference of the elastically scattered and unscattered electrons (diffracted and undiffracted beams).
A problem arises in that the Contrast Transfer Function (CTF) for low spatial frequencies in the image is zero or close to zero, resulting in low visibility of large objects/structures. This is caused by the fact that a camera or fluorescent screen at the image plane is sensitive to intensity variations, but not to phase variations of the impinging electron beam.
A solution to this is the use of a phase plate, the phase plate introducing a phase difference between the diffracted beams and the undiffracted beam. There are two main types of phase plates: the so-called Zernike phase plate leaves the undiffracted beam unchanged, and causes a phase shift of the diffracted beams, while the so-called Boersch phase plate shifts the undiffracted beam while leaving the diffracted beams unchanged.
The introduction of the phase difference by the phase plate changes the sine-like behavior of the CTF to a cosine-like behavior, and thus a maximum contrast for low spatial frequencies. The invention described here relates to a Zernike phase plate as described by Nagayama [-1-], more specifically in its FIG. 5. The phase plate is positioned in the diffraction plane of the objective lens, also known as the back-focal plane of this lens. In this plane the parallel beam impinging on the sample, and the parallel diffracted beams originating from the sample, are focused into spots. The central spot in this plane is passed through a central through-hole in the phase plate, and thus experiences no phase shift. Electrons passing outside the hole pass through a foil and experience a phase shift φ of preferable −π/2. The interference of the undiffracted and the diffracted beams now results in intensity modulation instead of phase modulation.
It is noted that the phase plate as described is mounted in the diffraction plane of the TEM, but that the phase plate can be mounted in any plane downstream of the diffraction plane that is an image plane thereof.
It is further noted that the phase plate can be a coated phase plate as shown in Nagayama [-1-], FIG. 5, but that coating is not essential: as long as the electrons pass through sufficient material to experience a phase shift with respect to the electrons passing through the central area or through-hole, phase modulation is translated in intensity modulation.
It is also noted that, although a phase shift φ of −π/2 is preferred, for other phase shifts the phase modulation is at least in part translated in an intensity modulation.
A problem with the known phase plate is that part of the electrons passing through the foil are scattered by the foil and do not contribute to the image formation in the image plane of the sample. This is mentioned in e.g. “Optimizing phase contrast in transmission electron microscopy with an electrostatic (Boersch) phase plate”, E. Majorovits et al., Ultramicroscopy Vol. 107 (2007), pages 213-226, further referred to as Majorowits [-2-]. At page 215, left column, it mentions as an advantage of the Boersch type phase plate over the Zernike type phase plate: “The advantage of the Boersch phase plate is obvious: no further electron scattering is introduced into the beam path, which avoids possible contamination problems and additional inelastic or plural scattering. High-resolution information is not affected and is transferred in the phase contrast image at its full signal strength.”
Another problem is that, although at another spatial frequency, the CTF shows zeros, and thus spatial frequency bands with low contrast, resulting in low visibility of objects/structures with corresponding dimensions.
The invention aims to provide at least a partial solution for one or both of these problems.
To that end a phase plate according to the invention is characterized in that between the first thin film and the holder structure at least one further thin film is present, said further thin film in working causing a further phase shift differing from the second phase shift, the difference between first phase shift and further phase shift for a further range of spatial frequencies causing an improvement of the contrast in the image compared to the situation where the further phase shift would equal the second phase shift.
The invention is based on the insight that for a first part of the CTF, corresponding to low spatial frequencies, it is beneficial to introduce a phase shift of approximately −π/2, thus changing the CTF from a sine-like behavior to a cosine-like behavior, but when for higher spatial frequencies the resulting absolute value of the CTF, |CTF|, is less than the |CTF| achieved without phase plate, it would have been better to do without this phase shift.
It is noted that the CTF can be written as
CTF(k)=A(k)E(k)sin(χ(k)+φ) [1]
where k is the spatial frequency, A(k) is the aperture function, E(k) the attenuation of the wave for higher spatial frequencies k, also called envelope function, χ(k) a function of the aberrations of the electron optical system and φ the phase shift introduced by a phase plate (if present). The value of A(k) and E(k) are always less than unity, and thus the maximum attainable is a function of the spatial frequency k and less than one. As the maximum value of sin(χ(k)+φ) for a proper φ equals 1, the maximum attainable contrast transfer function is denoted by
CTFm(k)=A(k)E(k) [2]
The improved phase plate described here preferably comprises a first thin film preferably formed as a first annulus causing a second phase shift and a further thin film preferably formed as an annulus surrounding and bordering the first annular area causing a further phase shift different from the second phase shift. This enables tuning the CTF for different spatial frequencies with different phase shifts.
Preferably the CTF caused by the outer edge of the first thin film equals the CTF of the inner edge of the further thin film, thereby joining the CTF for both films without discontinuity.
In a preferred embodiment the central area of the phase plate is a through-hole.
Although strictly only a phase difference between the central, undiffracted beam and the diffracted beam is required, preferably the central beam passes through a through-hole in the film, thereby avoiding electrons from the intense central beam to impinge on the foil and cause problems like heating, contamination, charging and the like.
Preferably the first phase shift caused by the first thin film is approximately −π/2, although small deviations do not change the CTF for low spatial frequencies much: a deviation of, for example, π/10, resulting in a phase shift of (−π/2±π/10) gives an almost identical contrast for low spatial frequencies.
Preferably the first thin film changes the |CTF| such, that |CTF|≧0.5×CTFm for electrons impinging on this first thin film, whereas the |CTF| without the phase plate would be below 0.5×CTFm.
Likewise the further thin film preferably causes a phase shift such that the |CTF| is kept above 0.5×CTFm for electrons impinging on this further thin film, where the phase plate described by Nagayama [-1-] would give a |CTFm| below 0.5×CTFm for said range of frequencies. More preferably the first and the further thin film should cause aphase shifts resulting in a |CTF|≧0.7×CTFm for electrons impinging on these thin films.
The skilled artisan will recognize that a graphene layer or a graphene double layer is preferred as further thin layer.
Preferably the further thin film improves the |CTF| for the electrons impinging on said further thin film from a value of less than 0.5×CTFm(k) to a value in excess of 0.5×CTFm(k) for electrons impinging on this further thin film, at least at the position where first thin film and second thin film border, more specifically from a value of less than 0.7×CTFm(k) to a value of at least 0.7×CTFm.
For electrons impinging further from the central beam (from the axis), the electrons fall on the thinner film, and hardly experience any phase shift or scattering. This is thus a situation that corresponds with the first maximum of the |CTF| in microscopes without a conventional phase plate. Therefore the phase plate according to the invention shows a first spatial frequency range where the sine-like function is phase shifted to a cosine-like function, and a further spatial frequency range where the CTF is (almost) identical to the CTF of a microscope without phase plate.
The phase plate according to the invention thus has an improved |CTF| over a microscope equipped with a conventional phase plate and a microscope without a phase plate. Compared to a microscope with a conventional phase plate the scattering of electrons out of the beam by the phase plate is also less, resulting in more electrons contributing to the image.
It is noted that more thin films, preferably in the form of concentric annuli, may be used. The phase shift of these annuli may differ from each other, either by using different materials or by using different thicknesses. In this way a phase plate resembling a Zone plate may be constructed, where correction of the CTF for numerous frequency intervals may be used.
It is further noted that in “Practical factors affecting the performance of a thin-film phase plate for transmission electron microscopy”, Danev, R. et al, Ultramicroscopy 109 (2009), pages 312-325 [-4-], more specifically its FIG. 1, a phase plate is displayed, consisting of a thin film with a central hole. Electrons passing through the central hole will experience no phase shift, and electrons passing through the thin film a phase shift. In said publication a contamination is shown on the thin film. Locally the phase plate will thus show a phase shift different from the phase shift in the rest of the thin film. However, this contaminant does not form a concentric annulus.
The invention is now elucidated using figures, where identical reference numerals indicate corresponding features.
To that end:
To align the optical components on the axis the TEM comprises a large number of deflectors, schematically shown as 128-1 . . . 128-7, although other deflectors on other places may be included.
It is noted that the phase plate may also be positioned in the back-focal plane itself.
The centre of the foil shows a through-hole 26 for passing the undiffracted beam. This hole has a diameter sufficient to pass the undiffracted beam, but preferably not much more, as then slightly scattered electrons, corresponding with electrons scattered by large structures (low spatial frequencies) do not pass through the foil to get the required phase shift but instead through the central hole. Typically the through-hole shows a diameter of less than 1 μm, formed in the foil using a focused ion beam.
The phase plate preferable shows rotational symmetry around axis 28.
The electrons passing through the carbon exhibit a phase shift as a result of the internal potential of the carbon. The relation of the thickness T of the amorphous carbon film(s) and the phase shift φ caused by passing through said film is described by Motoki [-3-]:
φ=−σVavT [1a]
σ=e/(ℏ Ve) [1b]
where Vav is the averaged inner potential of amorphous carbon, e is the elementary electric charge of an electron, ℏ is Plank's constant and Ve is the velocity of an incident electron. The averaged inner potential of amorphous carbon is 7.8 V and σ is 0.00892 (V·nm)−1 for 300 keV electrons.
With these values, the thickness T of a carbon phase plate is calculated to be 31 nm for a phase shift φ=−π/2 (for 300 keV electrons).
It is noted that this prior art phase plate uses a round diaphragm as holder structure (support structure), but that also silicon structures (with a round or square inner or outer perimeter) are known to be used. Such a silicon phase plate can be made using lithographic techniques, optionally combined with ion beam milling for forming the central through-hole in the thin film. It is further noted that traditionally carbon is used for the thin film of prior art phase plates.
However, other materials such as silicon may be used.
An overview of inner potentials and foil thicknesses for carbon, silicon and silicon nitride for different electron beam energies is given in table 1.
TABEL 1
calculated film thickness to achieve φ = −π/2
for a Zernike phase plate as a function of
beam energy for different materials.
Film thickness
[nm] for φ = −π/2
Material
Vav [V]
100 keV
200 keV
300 keV
C
7.8
21.8
27.6
30.9
Si
12.6
13.5
17.1
19.1
SiN
12.6
13.5
17.1
19.1
In
A disadvantage of this type of phase plate is that electrons scattered by the sample must pass through the carbon film, said carbon film again scattering part of the electrons from the beam, resulting in the loss of information, and thus an increase of the signal-to-noise ratio in the image. Also, the introduction of the phase plate introduces zeros where the absolute value of the CTF without phase plate has a maximum, and at these spatial frequencies thus decreases the visibility of the corresponding structures compared to a situation where no phase plate would have been used.
It is noted that typically approximately 20% of the electrons impinging on foil 22 are scattered from the beam, and thus lost for imaging.
The phase plate shows a similar holder structure 20 as the prior art phase plate. A thin film 30 is mounted on the holder, the thin layer having little effect on the beam. Inside diameter D1 an extra layer 32 is added to the thin layer, thus forming a first thin film with added thickness, whereby the part of the phase plate inside D1 resembles the prior art phase plate, showing a thin film that causes a phase shift of −π/2, but between D1 and the inner perimeter of the holder the film is much thinner and the phase shift much smaller than in prior art phase plates. The result is that electrons passing through the film 32 are shifted over −π/2, but electrons passing though the phase plate outside D1 are shifted much less, for example over −π/10 (for 300 keV corresponding to a carbon layer of approximately 6 nm). Therefore the CTF for these electrons resembles the CTF of a conventional microscope without phase plate, and as the film is thinner than in prior art phase plates, also the scattering by said film is less.
It is noted that it is possible to have continuity in |CTF| without having continuity in CTF: this implies that the contrast changes from black/white to white/black instantaneously. This is in most cases an unwanted situation.
It is further noted that for optimum performance (read: |CTF|) it may be attractive to chose another defocus than Scherzer defocus: the intent is to have as large a region as possible where the CTF is far removed from zero.
This embodiment shows a phase plate comprising a further thin film formed as a first annulus 32 as described in the first embodiment, augmented with another annulus 34 surrounding the first annulus. The annuli 32 and 34 may have the same thickness, or different thicknesses (as shown). The result of this embodiment is that for a first range of spatial frequencies, corresponding with all electrons falling on the phase plate within diameter D1 (but outside of the central hole) a first phase shift φ1 is achieved, for a second range of spatial frequencies corresponding with electrons falling on the phase plate between diameters D1 and D2, a phase shift φ2≈0, and a third range of spatial frequencies corresponding with electrons falling on the phase plate outside diameter D2, a phase shift φ3. In this way the CTF can be tuned for optimal contrast for a large range of spatial frequencies.
It is noted that the annulus 34 shown is separated from the annulus 32, but the annuli 32 and 34 may also touch each other.
As the person skilled in the art will recognize, it is possible to form a phase plate comprising a number of annuli, thus showing resemblance with a zone plate as used in e.g. x-ray optics. Also modulation of the thickness of the annulus or annuli in a discrete or non-discrete fashion is possible. However, as the CTF is also a function of the defocus, too many annuli or thickness modulation over a too large diameter may become impractical.
It shows a first region at low frequencies, joined to a second region between the points 402 and 404, glued to yet another region from 404 to higher frequencies.
It is noted that the scattering of electrons by the thin film does not lead to a different CTF, but in a decrease in signal-to-noise. This implies that more signal (impinging electrons) should be used to obtain an image with the same signal-to-noise. As known to the skilled artisan this may lead to damage of the sample, and thus to a lower quality of the images.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6674078, | Sep 25 2001 | Jeol Ltd | Differential contrast transmission electron microscope and method of processing data about electron microscope images |
7737412, | Jul 12 2004 | The Regents of the University of California | Electron microscope phase enhancement |
7915584, | Feb 13 2008 | Fei Company | TEM with aberration corrector and phase plate |
7977633, | Aug 27 2008 | MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN E V | Phase plate, in particular for an electron microscope |
8071954, | Jun 05 2008 | Fei Company | Hybrid phase plate |
8405027, | Jul 14 2010 | Fei Company | Contrast for scanning confocal electron microscope |
8426811, | Sep 30 2008 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation | Electron microscope |
8487268, | Aug 24 2005 | Method for the production of multiplayer electrostatic lens array | |
8633456, | Feb 07 2011 | Fei Company | Method for centering an optical element in a TEM comprising a contrast enhancing element |
8637821, | Jun 24 2010 | Fei Company | Blocking member for use in the diffraction plane of a TEM |
8772716, | May 23 2012 | Fei Company | Phase plate for a TEM |
20020011566, | |||
20080035854, | |||
20080202918, | |||
20090302217, | |||
20100051807, | |||
20100065741, | |||
20110133084, | |||
20110315876, | |||
20120012747, | |||
20120199756, | |||
20130313428, | |||
20140061463, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 07 2014 | Fei Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 27 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 13 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 14 2018 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 14 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 14 2019 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 14 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 14 2022 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 14 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 14 2023 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 14 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 14 2026 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 14 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 14 2027 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 14 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |