A self-contained fibrous buffing article including at least one layer of a fibrous nonwoven fabric; the nonwoven fabric having a hardened adherent coating including a crosslinked binder, abrasive particles, and a lubricant blend; and the lubricant blend including at least a fatty acid, mineral oil and glycerin.
|
12. A self-contained fibrous buffing article comprising at least one layer of a fibrous nonwoven fabric comprising a majority of fibers 15 denier or less in size;
the nonwoven fabric having a hardened adherent coating comprising a first coating and a second coating;
wherein the first coating comprises a crosslinked binder;
wherein the second coating comprises abrasive particles and a lubricant blend;
and further wherein the lubricant blend comprises at least a fatty acid, mineral oil and glycerin.
1. A self-contained fibrous buffing article comprising at least one layer of a fibrous nonwoven fabric comprising lyocell fiber; the nonwoven fabric having a hardened adherent coating comprising a first coating and a second coating;
wherein the first coating comprises a crosslinked binder;
wherein the second coating is disposed on the first coating and comprises abrasive particles and a lubricant blend;
and further wherein the lubricant blend comprises at least a fatty acid, mineral oil and glycerin.
2. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
3. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
4. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
5. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
6. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
7. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
8. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
9. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
10. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
11. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
13. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
14. The self-contained fibrous buffing article of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. 371 of PCT/US2012/042177 filed Jun. 13, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/496,778, filed Jun. 14, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Buffing wheels or buffs are generally formed from layers of a fibrous material which are stacked or fastened together. Fastening methods include, for example, compression, sewing, stapling, adhesive bonding, plastic or metal clinch rings, and combinations thereof. The buffing wheel is typically attached to a shaft and supported for rotation. Buffs have long been used to finish items such as machined parts, stamped parts, and cast articles which often have surfaces which must be modified, generally for aesthetic purposes. Buffing is a finishing process which is typically accomplished after more rigorous stock removal treatment of the surface. Buffs are typically rotated to obtain working surface speeds of from 1000 m/min to 3500 m/min.
Buffs are frequently categorized as either “cut” buffs or “color” buffs. A cut buff is more aggressive and is typically employed with a coarser buffing compound, a medium to high pressure between the buff and the work piece, and the work piece is advanced against the direction of rotation of the buff. This results in the refinement of scratches on the work piece and yields a uniform matte finish. A color buff is typically employed with a finer buffing compound, a medium to low pressure between the buff and the work piece, and the work piece is advanced in the direction of rotation of the buff. The color buff application results in a further refinement of scratches in the surface of the work piece and yields a reflective, mirror-like finish.
Buffs are most often employed to refine surfaces by a three-body abrasion mechanism. Driven buffs transmit energy to a work piece, but the abrading action is provided by an abrasive composition “buffing compound” that is peripherally applied, but not bound, to the buff's surface. Unbonded buffing compounds situated between the work piece and the buff's surface refines the work piece surface resulting in fewer and smaller scratches being imparted to the work piece surface as the buffing continues. While such three-body systems produce the required finishes, the buffing compound must be frequently applied to achieve a consistent finish, can be undesirably transferred onto adjacent surfaces, and leaves a residue on the work piece surface which then must be removed. Attempts to resolve these deficiencies by employing a two-body abrading system, wherein the abrasive composition is hardened to the working surfaces of the buff or pre-impregnated instead of peripherally applied, have been unsuccessful for cut and color buffs. Hence there is a need for cut and/or color buffs having a pre-impregnated abrasive composition for buffing such that the need to apply buffing compound to the buffing wheel is substantially eliminated.
The present invention relates to self-contained fibrous buffing articles that are functional without the application of external buffing compounds to the periphery or surfaces of the buffing wheel. Hence, in one embodiment, the invention resides a self-contained fibrous buffing article comprising at least one layer of a fibrous nonwoven fabric comprising lyocell fiber; the nonwoven fabric having a hardened adherent coating comprising a crosslinked binder, abrasive particles, and a lubricant blend; and the lubricant blend comprising at least a fatty acid, mineral oil and glycerin. In another embodiment, the invention resides in a self-contained fibrous buffing article comprising at least one layer of a fibrous nonwoven fabric comprising a majority of fibers 15 denier or less in size; the nonwoven fabric having a hardened adherent coating comprising a crosslinked binder, abrasive particles, and a lubricant blend; and the lubricant blend comprising at least a fatty acid, mineral oil and glycerin. The self-contained buff is capable of imparting bright finishes onto metal surfaces, has a long service life, and is resistant to fraying, dusting, smearing, and unraveling.
It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present disclosure, which broader aspects are embodied in the exemplary construction.
Repeated use of reference characters in the specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the disclosure.
As used herein, “self-contained fibrous buffing article” means a buffing article containing a pre-applied or pre-impregnated abrasive buffing composition to the fibrous material forming the buffing article. The abrasive buffing composition is suitable for cut or color buffing, and is applied to the buffing article by the manufacturer during the initial manufacturing of the buffing article. As such, the application of a buffing compound to the buffing article by an operator before first using or while using the buffing article to buff a work surface is not required.
As used herein, “hardening”, when used to describe the solidification of a precursor, refers to curing (e.g., polymerization and/or cross-linking, thermally or otherwise), drying (e.g., driving off a volatile solvent) and/or simply by cooling.
As used herein, forms of the words “comprise”, “have”, and “include” are legally equivalent and open-ended. Therefore, additional non-recited elements, functions, steps or limitations may be present in addition to the recited elements, functions, steps, or limitations.
The self-contained fibrous buffing article comprises at least one layer of a fibrous nonwoven fabric impregnated with a prebond coating comprising at least a first crosslinkable binder precursor, and at least a second coating comprising abrasive particles, a lubricant, and an optional second crosslinkable binder precursor. The prebond coating and second coating form an adherent coating comprising the pre-impregnated abrasive buffing composition. In other embodiments, additional coatings may be applied that contribute to the adherent coating of the buffing article.
Nonwoven Fabric
Nonwoven fabrics useful in the practice of this invention may be made by any known web formation system. In some embodiments, the fabric may be spunbonded, hydroentangled, or melt blown. In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric is a dry laid nonwoven fabric. In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric is an air-laid nonwoven fabric. In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric is formed by carding and cross-lapping. While web formation methods using staple fibers are typical, continuous filament systems such as spunbond or meltblown may be used. Useful staple fibers lengths include those between 0.75 inch (19 mm) and 4 inches (102 mm), inclusive. In some embodiments, a prebond coating may be applied to enhance the integrity of the nonwoven fabric.
The fiber component of the nonwoven fabric may be synthetic, man-made, or natural in origin. Exemplary synthetic fibers are polyester (such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) or poly(butylene terephthalate)), polyamide (such as poly(hexamethylene adipate) or polycaprolactam), and polyolefins (such as polyethylene or polypropylene). Exemplary man-made fibers include cellulose acetate, rayon, and lyocell. In some embodiments, natural fibers such as cotton, jute, ramie, and wool are useful alone or in combination. In some embodiments, blends of two, three, or even more fiber constituents may be used.
In some embodiments, fiber denier may be 0.1 denier (0.11 dtex) or greater. In some embodiments, fiber size may be 20 denier (22.5 dtex) or less, 15 denier or less, 6 denier or less, or 3 denier or less. In some embodiments, mixtures of two or more fiber deniers or ranges may be useful. In some embodiments, a majority, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 95% of the fibers forming the nonwoven are selected to have a fiber size from 0.1 denier to 20, 15, 6, or 3 denier.
In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric includes lyocell fiber. In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric is at least 30 wt % lyocell fiber, or at least 50 wt % lyocell fiber, or at least 70 wt % lyocell fiber. Other natural, manmade, or synthetic fibers may be also incorporated, including polyamide (e.g., nylon 6, nylon 6,6), polyester (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate), rayon, cellulose acetate, or cotton. In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric may contain melt-bondable fibers, including melt-bondable fibers that can be crosslinked after melt bonding to render them thermosetting.
The nonwoven fabric is prepared to have a basis weight from 50 g/m2 to 500 g/m2, or from 75 g/m2 to 400 g/m2, or from 100 g/m2 to 300 g/m2. The thickness of the nonwoven fabric is typically from 1 mm to 20 mm, or from 1 mm to 15 mm, or from 2 mm to 5 mm. In some embodiments, the nonwoven fabric is subsequently needle-tacked. In other embodiments, the nonwoven fabric may be subsequently calendered and/or otherwise thermally-treated (e.g., through-bonding).
Prebond Coating
The prebond coating comprises a first crosslinkable binder precursor. Suitable first crosslinkable binders are discussed later, but preferred cross linkable binders are polyurethanes. Useful prebond coatings are formulated to maximize the desired web properties (tear, tensile, flexibility) and provide the desired final product performance (e.g., cut, wear, finish) during use. Useful compositions of the prebond coating comprise 3-85 wt. %, 30-85 wt. %, 51-85 wt. %, and 70-85 wt. % binder precursor. The coating may be applied by any conventional means such as, for example, roll coating, spray coating, or saturation coating. After curing, a prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric is obtained. In some embodiments, the prebond coating can also include abrasive particles, lubricants, and/or optional additives. In general, the prebond coating will comprise a majority of the cured crosslinkable binder applied to the cured buffing article.
In some applications, it may be advantageous to produce buffing articles comprising a prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric without having subsequent coatings or any abrasive particles applied to the buff. Such “cleaning buffs” may optionally be employed to efficiently provide a final wiping and cleaning of the work piece after using a cut or color buff having abrasive particles. Alternately, buffing articles comprising a prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric may be used like a traditional cotton buff with a buffing compound frequently applied by an operator during use.
Second Coating
The second coating comprises an aqueous dispersion of abrasive particles, a lubricant, and an optional second crosslinkable binder precursor. Useful second coatings are formulated to maximize the desired abrasive effects (cut or color buffing), maximize the buff's flexibility, and minimize both smearing (unwanted transfer of buffing components onto the work piece) and dusting during use. Useful compositions of the second coating are 0-50 wt. % binder precursor, 5-99 wt % lubricant, and 0-80 wt % mineral. The nonwoven fabric is coated with the second coating and other optional additives in one or more coating steps. The coatings may be applied by any conventional means such as, for example, roll coating, spray coating, or saturation coating. In some embodiments, three coatings are applied: a lubricant coating followed by a hardening step; a phenolic resin coating followed by a hardening step; and a lubricant coating followed by a hardening step. In some embodiments, the coatings are applied in at least two separate steps with the binder precursor and mineral applied and then hardened followed by the lubricant coating and hardening. In further embodiments, two lubricant coatings are applied and hardened.
Crosslinkable Binder Precursors
Suitable binder precursors for the first and second crosslinkable binders include polyurethane polymers or prepolymers, phenolic resins, and acrylics. In some embodiments, the first and second crosslinkable binders are selected to be different chemistries such as a phenolic resin and an acrylic. In other embodiments the first and second crosslinkable binders are the same chemistry, but may be applied at the same or different coating weights.
Examples of useful urethane prepolymers include polyisocyanates and blocked versions thereof. Typically, blocked polyisocyanates are substantially unreactive to isocyanate reactive compounds (e.g., amines, alcohols, thiols, etc.) under ambient conditions (e.g., temperatures in a range of from about 20 degrees C. to about 25 degrees C.), but upon application of sufficient thermal energy the blocking agent is released, thereby generating isocyanate functionality that reacts with the amine curative to form a covalent bond.
Useful polyisocyanates include, for example, aliphatic polyisocyanates (e.g., hexamethylene diisocyanate or trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate); alicyclic polyisocyanates (e.g., hydrogenated xylylene diisocyanate or isophorone diisocyanate); aromatic polyisocyanates (e.g., tolylene diisocyanate or 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate); adducts of any of the foregoing polyisocyanates with a polyhydric alcohol (e.g., a diol, low molecular weight hydroxyl group-containing polyester resin, water, etc.); adducts of the foregoing polyisocyanates (e.g., isocyanurates, biurets); and mixtures thereof.
Useful commercially available polyisocyanates include, for example, those available under the trade designation “ADIPRENE” from Chemtura Corporation, Middlebury, Conn. (e.g., “ADIPRENE L 0311”, “ADIPRENE L 100”, “ADIPRENE L 167”, “ADIPRENE L 213”, “ADIPRENE L 315”, “ADIPRENE L 680”, “ADIPRENE LF 1800A”, “ADIPRENE LF 600D”, “ADIPRENE LFP 1950A”, “ADIPRENE LFP 2950A”, “ADIPRENE LFP 590D”, “ADIPRENE LW 520”, and “ADIPRENE PP 1095”); polyisocyanates available under the trade designation “MONDUR” from Bayer Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa. (e.g., “MONDUR 1437”, “MONDUR MP-095”, or “MONDUR 448”); and polyisocyanates available under the trade designations “AIRTHANE” and “VERSATHANE” from Air Products and Chemicals, Allentown, Pa. (e.g., “AIRTHANE APC-504”, “AIRTHANE PST-95A”, “AIRTHANE PST-85A”, “AIRTHANE PET-91A”, “AIRTHANE PET-75D”, “VERSATHANE STE-95A”, “VERSATHANE STE-P95”, “VERSATHANE STS-55”, “VERSATHANE SME-90A”, and “VERSATHANE MS-90A”).
To lengthen pot-life, polyisocyanates such as, for example, those mentioned above may be blocked with a blocking agent according to various techniques known in the art. Exemplary blocking agents include ketoximes (e.g., 2-butanone oxime); lactams (e.g., epsilon-caprolactam); malonic esters (e.g., dimethyl malonate and diethyl malonate); pyrazoles (e.g., 3,5-dimethylpyrazole); alcohols including tertiary alcohols (e.g., t-butanol or 2,2-dimethylpentanol), phenols (e.g., alkylated phenols), and mixtures of alcohols as described.
Exemplary useful commercially available blocked polyisocyanates include those marketed by Chemtura Corporation under the trade designations “ADIPRENE BL 11”, “ADIPRENE BL 16”, “ADIPRENE BL 31”, and blocked polyisocyanates marketed by Baxenden Chemicals, Ltd., Accrington, England under the trade designation “TRIXENE” (e.g., “TRIXENE BL 7641”, “TRIXENE BL 7642”, “TRIXENE BL 7772”, and “TRIXENE BL 7774”).
In some embodiments, the amount of urethane prepolymer present in a polyurethane binder coating is in an amount from 10 to 85 percent by weight, or from 20 to 60 percent by weight, or even from 40 to 70 percent by weight based on the total weight of the hardened coating composition, although amounts outside of these ranges may also be used.
Suitable amine curatives include aromatic, alkyl-aromatic, or alkyl polyfunctional amines, preferably primary amines. Examples of useful amine curatives include 4,4′-methylenedianiline; polymeric methylene dianilines having a functionality of 2.1 to 4.0 which include those known under the trade designations “CURITHANE 103”, commercially available from the Dow Chemical Company, and “MDA-85” from Bayer Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa.; 1,5-diamine-2-methylpentane; tris(2-aminoethyl)amine; 3-aminomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexylamine (i.e., isophoronediamine), trimethylene glycol di-p-aminobenzoate, bis(o-aminophenylthio)ethane, 4,4′-methylenebis(dimethyl anthranilate), bis(4-amino-3-ethylphenyl)methane (e.g., as marketed under the trade designation “KAYAHARD AA” by Nippon Kayaku Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan); an unmodified aromatic amine curative believed to comprise 3,3′ diethyl 4,4′ diaminodiphenyl methane, marketed under the trade designation “LAPDX K-450” by Royce International, East Rutherford, N.J.; and bis(4-amino-3,5-diethylphenyl)methane (e.g., as marketed under the trade designation “LONZACURE M-DEA” by Lonza, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland), and mixtures thereof. If desired, polyol(s) may be added to the hardenable composition, for example, to modify (e.g., to retard) cure rates as required by the intended use.
The amine curative should be present in an amount effective (i.e., an effective amount) to cure the blocked polyisocyanate to the degree required by the intended application; for example, the amine curative may be present in a stoichiometric ratio of curative to isocyanate (or blocked isocyanate) in a range from 0.8 to 1.35 or in a range from 0.85 to 1.20.
Phenolic materials are useful binder precursors because of their thermal properties, availability, cost, and ease of handling. Resole phenolics have a molar ratio of formaldehyde to phenol of greater than or equal to one, typically from 1.5:1.0 to 3.0:1.0. Novolac phenolics have a molar ratio of formaldehyde to phenol of less than 1.0:1.0. Examples of commercially available phenolics include those known by the trade names DUREZ and VARCUM from Occidental Chemicals Corp., RESINOX from Monsanto, AROFENE from Ashland Chemical Co., and AROTAP from Ashland Chemical Co.
In some embodiments, the amount of phenolic binder precursor present in the phenolic binder coating is in an amount from 2 to 50 percent by weight, or in an amount from 5 to 40 percent by weight, or even in an amount from 5 to 35 percent by weight based on the total weight of the coating composition, although amounts outside of these ranges may also be used.
Emulsions of crosslinked acrylic resin particles may also find utility in the present invention.
Some binder precursors include a phenolic mixed with a latex. Examples of such latexes include materials containing acrylonitrile butadiene, acrylics, butadiene, butadiene-styrene, and combinations thereof. These latexes are commercially available from a variety of different sources and include those available under the trade designations RHOPLEX and ACRYLSOL commercially available from Rohm and Haas Company, FLEXCRYL and VALTAC commercially available from Air Products & Chemicals Inc., SYNTHEMUL, TYCRYL, and TYLAC commercially available from Reichold Chemical Co., HYCAR and GOODRITE commercially available from B. F. Goodrich, CHEMIGUM commercially available from Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., NEOCRYL commercially available from ICI, BUTAFON commercially available from BASF, and RES commercially available from Union Carbide.
Lubricant
Examples of lubricants for use in the self-contained fibrous buffing article include fatty acids (e.g., stearic acid, lauric acid, palmitic acid, myristic acid, oleic acid, palmitoleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid), metallic salts of fatty acids (e.g., lithium stearate, zinc stearate), solid lubricants (e.g., poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE), graphite, and molybdenum disulfide), mineral oils and waxes (including micronized waxes), carboxylic acid esters (e.g., butyl stearate), poly(dimethylsiloxane) fluids, poly(dimethylsiloxane) gums, and simple polyol compounds such as glycerin, and combinations thereof. Such lubricants and commercial sources are known in the art. Other suitable lubricants may be apparent to those skilled in the art after reviewing the present disclosure.
Useful lubricants include, for example, “INDUSTRENE 4516” (from PCM Biogenics, Memphis, Tennesee), “LIC17” (from Ashland, Inc., Covington, Ky.), mineral oil (from Univar USA, Redmond, Wash.), “ZINCUM SW”, “ZINCUM AV”, “CEASIT SW” and “CEASIT AV” (from Baerlocher Do Brasil S.A, Americana, SP, Brazil), “COMAX A”, “COMAX T”, “QUIMIPEL COAT 9327” and “QUIMIPEL COAT 9330” (from Quimipel Industria Quimica LTDA, Piracaia, SP, Brazil), “Natural Graphite” (from Nacional de Grafite LTDA, Itapecerica, MG, Brazil), “Mineral Oil USP Grade Agecom and Drakeol” (from Agecom Produtos de Petroleo, Mauá, SP, Brazil), KAYDOL White Mineral Oil (from Sonneborn, Mahwah, N.J.) and glycerin (from Acme Hardesty Oleochemicals, Blue Bell, Pa.).
In one embodiment, three lubricants in combination forming a lubricant blend were found highly effective. In particular, varying the weight percentages of the fatty acid, mineral oil, and glycerin can be used to reduce smearing and improve the polishing performance of the buffing article as discussed in the Examples.
Abrasive Particles
Suitable abrasive particles are those useful in buffing operations. The abrasive particles may be of any suitable composition, but those comprising chromium oxide, titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, calcined micronized aluminum oxide, iron oxide or silicon carbide are typical. Appropriate abrasive particle size distributions include those with median particle diameters of no greater than 50 micrometers, no greater than 30 micrometers, or no greater than 15 micrometers.
Examples of useful abrasive particles include “E2616 GREEN” (from Akrochem Corporation, Akron, Ohio), “KRONOS 2310” (from Kronos Inc., Houston, Tex.), “BK-5099” (from Elementis Pigments Inc., Fairview Heights, Ill.), “MICROGRIT WCA” or MICROGRIT PXA (from Micro Abrasives Corporation, Westfield, Mass.), and combinations thereof.
Other Optional Additives
Other optional additives that may be beneficial in the second or other coatings that form the adherent coating include surfactants, wetting agents, antifoaming agents, colorants, coating modifiers, and coupling agents.
An anionic surfactant is beneficial to incorporate the lubricant into the second coating. An example of an effective anionic surfactant is sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, available as “Aerosol OT-75” from Cytec Do Brasil Ltda., Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. Another useful emulsifier is triethanolamine, such as that available as “Triethanolamine 99% TECH” from Ashland Chemical Company, Columbus, Ohio.
A wetting agent is useful to promote impregnation of the fibrous buffing material with the coatings. Useful wetting agents include surfactants that are at least partially non-ionic, such as “NopcoWet BR”, available from Gap Quimica Ltda., Guarulhos, SP, Brazil. Other useful nonionic surfactants include “TERGITOL 15-S-40” and “TERGITOL XJ”, both from Dow Chemical, Midland, Mich., and “PEG DS6000” available from BASF, Florham Park, N.J.
Coating modifiers and VOC reducers such as hydroxyethyl ethylene urea are useful to promote film formation. Useful coating modifiers include “SR-511” available from Sartomer Company, Exton, Pa. Other coating modifiers and pH adjusters such as citric acid are useful to control coating viscosity.
A coupling agent is useful to improve adhesion between the nonwoven buffing material, the binder, and the abrasive mineral. Useful coupling agents include “Z-6020 Silane” and “Z-6040 Silane”, both available from Dow Corning, Midland, Mich. Colorants or pigments such as iron oxide, titanium oxide, or carbon black may be added to visually identify different buffing articles and/or type of buffing article. In some embodiments, pigments such as chromium oxide may also serve as an abrasive particle. Suitable colorants pigments include “KRONOS 2310” (Kronos Inc., Houston, Tex.), “E2616 GREEN” (Akrochem Corporation, Akron, Ohio), “BK-5099 PIGMENT” (Elementis Pigments Inc., Fairview heights, Ill.), and “Copperas Red Iron Oxide R5098D” (Rockwood Pigments Inc., Beltsville, Md.)
Coating Impregnation Process
The self-contained fibrous buffing articles are made by impregnating a length of suitable fibrous nonwoven fabric with a prebond coating and then hardening the first cross-linkable binder. Prebond coatings may be applied by conventional application means, such as roll coating, curtain coating, die coating, or spraying.
Then, a second coating comprising abrasive particles, a lubricant, and optionally a second crosslinkable binder precursor and wetting agent and/or a surfactant, followed by a hardening step forming a hardened second coating on the fibers and surfaces of the nonwoven fabric. The adherent coating may be incorporated into the fibrous material in one or more steps with either one or more hardening steps as previously discussed. In some embodiments, a second coating is incorporated and hardened, followed by a subsequent coating comprising additional lubricant, followed by an additional hardening step. Adherent coatings may be applied by conventional application means, such as roll coating, curtain coating, die coating, or spraying.
In some embodiments, the total dry add-on weight of the coating(s) is from 50 g/m2 to 2000 g/m2, or from 200 g/m2 to 1500 g/m2, or from 200 g/m2 to 1100 g/m2. In some embodiments, the total weight of the final coated buffing fabric is from 200 g/m2 to 1500 g/m2.
During the hardening step(s), as water is removed, it has been discovered that more desirable adherent coating formulations separate into a hydrophilic phase and a lipophilic phase. While not wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors believe that the partitioning of the various coating constituents into these discrete phases after hardening contributes to superior buffing performance when using the self-contained fibrous buffing article.
Self-Contained Fibrous Buffing Articles
The buff must not only be capable of withstanding the strenuous use conditions typically encountered in buffing operations, but it must also be capable of holding the adherent buffing composition on the buffing surface. Self-contained fibrous buffing articles may be any design or style presently known or contemplated in the future. The most popular forms of buffs are depicted by
The particular construction of a sewn buff will depend upon its ultimate use. Buffs formed of layers of fabric, which are sewn together, as shown in
The puckered or pleated buff is popular for its cool running capability, provided by pleats or puckers in its fabric. The type of the construction of a puckered buff depends upon its ultimate use also. Different hardnesses may be required for various cutting and/or color buffing applications. Hardness may be controlled somewhat by the spacing of buffs on the mandrel, but more commonly is regulated by the degree of puckering, the diameter of the buff relative to the clinch ring diameter, or the stiffness of the buff fabric.
Other self-contained fibrous buffing articles may also find utility, including “flap wheel” constructions 40 as illustrated in
The density of the nonwoven material with the hardened adherent coating in a flat configuration before being puckered into a buff may range from 0.1 g/cm3 to 0.6 g/cm3, from 0.2 g/cm3 to 0.5 g/cm3, or from 0.3 g/cm3 to 0.45 g/cm3. The density of the nonwoven material with the hardened adherent coating is the weight in grams divided by the volume in cubic centimeters. Buffs having too low of a density have insufficient cut while those having too high of a density tend to smear.
As exemplified in Table 8, the nonwoven material with the hardened adherent coating forming the self-contained fibrous buffing article has particularly effective results when using stearic acid, mineral oil, and glycerin in combination as the lubricant blend. In some embodiments, the fiber portion of the nonwoven material with the hardened adherent coating comprise 10-25 wt. % (weight percent) or 15-20 wt. %. The amount of lyocell fibers, if used, in the fiber portion weight percent can vary and be 25-80 wt. %, 30-70 wt. percent, or 40-60 wt. % with the balance being other fibers such staple length polyamide fibers. Too much lyocell fiber produces too weak of a buffing article while too little results in significantly reduced buffing performance. The abrasive mineral portion of the nonwoven material with the hardened adherent coating comprises 20-60 wt. %. or 35-55 wt. %. The lubricant portion of the nonwoven material with the hardened adherent coating comprises a blend of at least stearic acid, mineral oil, and glycerin and comprises 5-45 wt. %, or 20-35 wt. %. The stearic acid can comprise 5-35 wt. %, 10-30 wt. %, or 15-25 wt. %; the glycerin can comprise 0.5 to 25 wt. %, 1-20 wt. %, or 2-6 wt. %; and the mineral oil can comprise 0.5-15 wt. %, 1-10 wt. %, or 0.5-5.5 wt. %.
Objects and advantages of this invention are further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples; however, the particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit this invention. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages, ratios, etc. in the Examples and the rest of the specification are by weight. The abbreviations shown in Table 1 are used throughout the Examples.
TABLE 1
ABBREVIATION INDEX
Abbreviation
Description
T15
Surfactant, available from Dow, Midland, Michigan as
“TERGITOL 15-S-40”
PEG
Surfactant, available from BASF, Florham Park, New
Jersey as “MAPEG DS6000”
TEA
Triethanolamine, available from Ashland Chemical
Company, Columbus, Ohio “Triethanolamine 99%
TECH”
Glycerin
Polyol, obtained from Acme Hardesty Oleochemicals,
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania
CrO
Chromium oxide abrasive, obtained from Akrochem
Corporation, Akron, Ohio as “E2616 Green”
TiO
Kronos 2310, titanium dioxide pigment, obtained from
Kronos Inc. Houston, TX
FeO
Black iron oxide, BK-5099 Pigment, obtained from
Elementis Pigments Inc. Fairview Heights, IL
WCA
“MICROGRIT WCA #3”, aluminum oxide powder
having an average particle size of 3.25 micrometers,
obtained from Micro Abrasives Corporation, Westfield,
MA
PXA
“MICROGRIT PXA 411”, unfused aluminum oxide
powder having an average partical size of 0.75
micrometers, obtained from Micro Abrasives
Corporation, Westfield, MA
CrO/TiO
Abrasive particle blend, 50.0% Cr2O3 and 50.0% TiO2 by
weight
FeO/WCA
Abrasive particle blend, 25.0 wt % Fe2O3 and 75.0 wt %
WCA
SA
Stearic acid, obtained from PMC Biogenics, Memphis,
Tennessee as “INDUSTRENE 4516”
LiSt
Lithium stearate lubricant, obtained from Ashland, Inc.,
Covington, Kentucky as “LIC17”
MO
Mineral oil, obtained from Univar USA, Redmond,
Washington
BL16
Polyurethane prepolymer, obtained from Chemtura
Group, Middlebury, Connecticut as “ADIPRENE BL-16”
TXJ
Surfactant, available from Dow Chemical, Midland,
Michigan as “TERGITOL XJ”
KAA
Amine curing agent, available from Nippon Kayaku
Company, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan as “KAYAHARD AA”
SR511
Hydroxyethyl ethylene urea, available from Sartomer
Company, Inc, Exton, Pennsylvania as “SR-511 A”
Arofene
Phenolic resin, obtained from Ashland Inc., Covington,
Kentucky as “AROFENE 72155 W55”
Lyocell 1.7
Lyocell staple fiber, 1.7 dtex × 38 mm, available from
Lenzing Fibers, Lenzing, Austria as “Tencel HS 260”
Lyocell 2.4
Lyocell staple fiber, 2.4 dtex × 38 mm, available from
Lenzing Fibers, Lenzing, Austria as “Tencel HS 260”
Nylon 15
Polyamide staple fiber, nylon 6,6, “Type 501, 15 Denier
1.5 inch cut length, merge 153×90”, obtained from
Invista, Wichita, KS
Nylon 3
Polyamide staple fiber, nylon 6,6, “Type 881, 3 Denier
2.0 inch cut length, merge 134×P7”, obtained from
Invista, Wichita, KS
W-290H
“WITCOBOND W-290H” aqueous polyurethane
dispersion, obtained from Chemtura, Middlebury,
Connecticut
GL-720
“RHOPLEX GL-720”, water based acrylic, obtained
from Rhom and Haas Philadelphia PA
PMA
Propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate,
“DOWANOL PMA 484431”, obtained from Sigma
Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri
K450
Aromatic amine curing agent, “LAPOX K-450”, obtained
from Royce International, East Rutherford, New Jersey
TABLE 2
Coating Formulations for Examples 1 & 2
Material
Coating 1, %
Coatings 2 & 4, %
Coating 3, %
Water
77.6
65.5
58.4
T15
1.3
1.5
1.6
PEG
1.0
1.0
1.1
TEA
0.2
0.6
0.6
Glycerin
1.2
3.7
3.9
CrO
5.2
9.2
9.7
TiO
5.2
9.2
9.7
SA
2.4
7.7
8.1
LiSt
0.6
0.4
0.4
MO
1.1
1.0
1.1
BL16
3.7
0.0
0.0
TXJ
0.1
0.0
0.0
KAA
0.6
0.0
0.0
SR511
0.0
0.2
0.2
Arofene
0.0
0.0
5.0
TABLE 3
Coating Formulations for Example 3
Material
Coating 1, %
Coating 2, %
Coating 3, %
Coating 4, %
Water
71.0
71.4
55.5
58.8
T15
1.7
2.0
1.7
2.6
PEG
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
TEA
0.2
0.8
0.7
1.1
Glycerin
1.5
4.9
4.3
6.5
FeO
2.4
1.6
1.7
1.3
WCA3
7.3
4.9
5.2
3.9
SA
3.2
10.2
9.0
13.6
LiSt
0.7
1.2
1.1
1.6
MO
1.4
2.4
2.2
3.2
BL16
8.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
TXJ
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
KAA
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
SR511
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.4
Arofene
0.0
0.0
18.0
0.0
W290H
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.2
GL720
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.3
TABLE 4
Coating Formulations for Example 4
Material
Coating 1, %
Coatings 2 & 4, %
Coating 3, %
Water
64.0
61.0
51.0
T15
1.8
0.3
0.3
PEG
1.8
1.2
1.3
TEA
0.2
0.7
0.8
Glycerin
1.3
4.3
4.6
CrO
17.8
21.5
22.9
SA
2.7
9.0
9.5
LiSt
1.1
0.5
0.5
MO
1.8
1.2
1.3
BL16
6.4
0.0
0.0
TXJ
0.2
0.0
0.0
KAA
1.0
0.0
0.0
SR511
0.0
0.3
0.3
Arofene
0.0
0.0
7.6
TABLE 5
Coating Formulations for Examples 5-7
Material
Coating 5, %
Coating 6, %
Coating 7, %
Water
0.0
51.1%
55.3%
T15
0.0
0.4%
0.5%
TEA
0.0
0.3%
0.3%
Glycerin
0.0
4.8%
5.2%
SR511
0.0
0.3%
0.3%
MO
0.0
1.4%
1.5%
LiSt
0.0
0.5%
0.6%
PEG
0.0
0.6%
0.6%
PXA
0.0
21.5%
23.3%
CrO
0.0
0.9%
1.0%
SA
0.0
10.5%
11.4%
Arofene
0.0
7.6%
0.0
PMA
58.2
0.0
0.0
BL16
35.0
0.0
0.0
K450
5.4
0.0
0.0
LiSt
1.4
0.0
0.0
TABLE 6
Coating Formulations for Examples 8-12
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
Coating
8, %
9, %
10, %
11, %
12, %
13, %
14, %
15, %
16, %
17, %
Water
51.0%
55.2%
51.0%
55.2%
51.0%
55.2%
51.0%
55.2%
51.0%
55.2%
T15
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
TEA
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
Glycerin
4.8%
5.2%
0.8%
0.9%
4.8%
5.2%
8.8%
9.5%
0.8%
0.9%
SR511
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
MO
1.4%
1.5%
5.3%
5.8%
5.3%
5.8%
1.4%
1.5%
1.4%
1.5%
LiSt
0.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
PEG
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
PXA
21.5%
23.2%
21.5%
23.2%
21.5%
23.2%
21.5%
23.2%
21.5%
23.2%
CrO
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
1.0%
SA
10.5%
11.4%
10.5%
11.4%
6.5%
7.1%
6.5%
7.1%
14.5%
15.7%
Arofene
7.6%
0.0%
7.6%
0.0%
7.6%
0.0%
7.6%
0.0%
7.6%
0.0%
TABLE 7
Coating Formulations or Examples 13-15
Material
Coating 18, %
Coating 19, %
Coating 20, %
Water
54.8%
54.9%
54.9%
T15
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
TEA
0.3%
0.3%
0.2%
Glycerin
2.8%
2.3%
1.9%
SR511
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
MO
1.9%
1.5%
1.3%
LiSt
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
PEG
0.7%
0.5%
0.5%
PXA
24.0%
27.8%
30.4%
CrO
1.0%
0.8%
0.7%
SA
14.0%
11.4%
9.7%
TABLE 8
Component Wt. Percentages of Nonwoven with Hardened Adherent Coating
Examples 5-15
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fiber
14.4%
17.7%
20.3%
18.9%
18.9%
21.2%
19.9%
16.7%
16.9%
17.3%
18.2%
Prebond
3.0%
3.7%
4.3%
4.0%
4.0%
4.4%
4.2%
3.5%
3.5%
3.6%
3.8%
Binder
T15
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.7%
0.6%
0.5%
TEA
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
Glycerin
9.1%
8.6%
8.2%
8.4%
1.4%
8.1%
15.1%
1.5%
4.9%
4.0%
3.4%
SR511
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
MO
2.6%
2.4%
2.3%
2.4%
9.4%
9.0%
2.3%
2.5%
3.3%
2.7%
2.2%
LiSt
1.1%
1.1%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
PEG
1.1%
1.1%
1.0%
1.2%
1.2%
1.1%
1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
0.9%
0.8%
PXA
41.0%
38.5%
36.9%
37.6%
37.7%
36.3%
37.0%
39.1%
42.4%
48.8%
52.7%
CrO
1.7%
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
1.5%
1.6%
1.7%
1.8%
1.4%
1.2%
SA
20.1%
18.9%
18.1%
18.4%
18.4%
11.1%
11.3%
26.4%
24.7%
20.0%
16.7%
Arofene
4.1%
4.7%
4.6%
4.8%
4.6%
4.5%
4.6%
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Fiber
14.4%
17.7%
20.3%
18.9%
18.9%
21.2%
19.9%
16.7%
16.9%
17.3%
18.2%
Prebond Resin
3.0%
3.7%
4.3%
4.0%
4.0%
4.4%
4.2%
3.5%
3.5%
3.6%
3.8%
Lubricant (SA,
32.9%
30.9%
29.7%
30.2%
30.3%
29.2%
29.7%
31.4%
33.0%
26.8%
22.4%
MO, Glycerin,
LiSt)
Other (T15,
7.0%
7.5%
7.2%
7.8%
7.6%
7.4%
7.6%
7.6%
2.5%
2.0%
1.7%
TEA, SR511,
PEG, Arofene)
Mineral
42.7%
40.1%
38.5%
39.2%
39.3%
37.8%
38.6%
40.8%
44.1%
50.2%
53.9%
(PXA, CrO)
Examples 1-15 were prepared to demonstrate various embodiments of the self-contained fibrous buffing article.
The self-contained fibrous buffing article of Example 1 was prepared to compare its ability to refine a metallic surface to that of current buffing articles. A 130 g/m2 airlaid nonwoven fabric was prepared from 100% Lyocell 1.7 fibers (see materials description in Table 1) and needletacked to produce a 4.5 mm thick fabric. Coating 1 (coatings are described in Table 2) was applied (all coatings were applied via a roll coater) to a wet add-on of 301 g/m2 and heated 5 minutes at 160 degrees C. Coating 2 was then applied to a wet add-on of 399 g/m2 and heated 5 minutes at 140 degrees C. Coating 3 was then applied to achieve a wet add-on of 491 g/m2 and heated 5 minutes at 176 degrees C. Finally, Coating 4 was applied to a wet add-on of 465 g/m2 and heated 5 minutes at 140 degrees C.
The cumulative dry coated fabric weight was 386 g/m2 and the final thickness varied between 2.8 and 3.5 mm. The coated fabric was then converted into 10 inch diameter discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Buffing Test.
Example 2 was prepared identically to Example 1 except that a 167 g/m2 fabric of 75/25 wt % blend of lyocell 1.7/nylon 15 staple fiber was substituted for 100% lyocell 1.7 staple fiber and the final weight was 473 g/m2.
Example 3 was prepared identically to Example 1 except that a 280 g/m2 fabric of 90/10 wt % blend of lyocell 1.7/nylon 15 staple fiber was substituted for the 130 g/m2 fabric of 100% lyocell 1.7 staple fiber, the abrasive particles in the coatings were FeO/WCA instead of CrO/TiO, the coatings were those indicated in Table 3, and the final weight was 900 g/m2.
Example 4 was prepared identically to Example 1 except that a 285 g/m2 fabric of 90/10 wt % blend of lyocell 1.7/nylon 15 staple fiber was substituted for the 130 g/m2 fabric of 100% lyocell 1.7 staple fiber, the abrasive particles in the coatings were CrO instead of CrO/TiO, the coatings were those indicated in Table 4 and the final weight was 826 g/m2.
A 193 g/m2 airlaid nonwoven fabric of 50 wt % lyocell 2.4 staple fiber and 50 wt % nylon 3 staple fiber was prepared and needletacked to produce an approximately 3.2 mm (0.125 in) thick fabric. Approximately 42 g/m2 dry weight of Coating 5 found in Table 5 was applied via a roll coater and dryed in a tunnel oven at 163 degrees C. for 6 minutes to form the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric. Coating 6 found in Table 5 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 581 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Finally, Coating 7 found in Table 5 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 514 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The cumulative dry coated fabric weight was 1330 g/m2 with a final thickness of approximately 3.2 mm (0.125″). The final density of Example 5 was calculated to be approximately 0.45 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 6 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 548 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes. Coating 7 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 293 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 6 was calculated to be approximately 0.36 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 6 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 460 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes. Coating 7 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 243 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 7 was calculated to be approximately 0.30 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 8 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 515 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Coating 9 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 255 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 8 was calculated to be approximately 0.34 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 10 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 502 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Coating 11 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 272 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 9 was calculated to be approximately 0.34 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 12 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 431 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Coating 13 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 234 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 10 was calculated to be approximately 0.34 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 14 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 477 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Coating 15 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 243 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 11 was calculated to be approximately 0.36 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 16 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 548 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Coating 17 was applied via a roll coater at approximately 356 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 12 was calculated to be approximately 0.36 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 18 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 389 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 12 minutes. Coating 18 was re-applied via a roll coater at approximately 519 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 13 was calculated to be 0.36 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 19 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 406 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes. Coating 19 was re-applied via a roll coater at approximately 472 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 14 was calculated to be 0.35 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
Coating 20 was applied via a roll coater to the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric of Example 5 at approximately 389 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes. Coating 20 was re-applied via a roll coater at approximately 435 g/m2 dry weight and dried in a tunnel oven at 121 degrees C. for 6 minutes.
The final density of Example 15 was calculated to be 0.33 g/cm3. The coated fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated using the Cut and Transfer Test.
The nonwoven fabric comprising lyocell fiber was prepared and incorporated into a cleaning buff construction having neither abrasive particles nor lubricant added to the nonwoven fabric.
A 193 g/m2 airlaid nonwoven fabric of 50 wt. % lyocell 2.4 staple fiber and 50 wt. % nylon 3 staple fiber was prepared and needletacked to produce an approximately 3.2 mm (0.125 in) thick fabric. Approximately 42 g/m2 dry weight of Coating 5 found in Table 5 was applied via a roll coater and dried in a tunnel oven at 163 degrees C. for 6 minutes to form the prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric having a dry weight of 235 g/m2 and a final thickness of approximately 3.1 mm. The final density of Example 16 was calculated to be approximately 0.19 g/cm3. The prebonded fibrous nonwoven fabric was converted into 203 mm (8 in) discs by die cutting and the resulting discs were evaluated in an off-hand operation. Knee implants were first manually treated with a buff constructed from the material of Example 13 and subsequently cleaned with a buff constructed from the nonwoven fabric of Example 16. The haze and residual film left on the implant was easily removed by nonwoven fabric discs of Example 16 exposing the high gloss finish on the knee implant.
Comparative Examples A through D were commercially available buffing articles, all of which required the use of an external buffing compound. A preliminary evaluation of seven commercially available buffing compounds was made. The top-performing three for each type of metal were chosen for the comparative examples.
Comparative Example A was an 80-ply spiral-sewn cotton wheel (part number SSCW1080, obtained from Caswell Electroplating, Lyons, N.Y.). Comparative Example A was used with a white rouge bar compound (White Rouge WBC5, obtained from Caswell Electroplating, Lyons, N.Y.).
Comparative Example B was a 40-ply loose cotton wheel (part number LCW1020 from Caswell Electroplating, Lyons, N.Y.). Comparative Example B was used with a jeweler's rouge buffing compound (Red Rouge JRBC5, obtained from Caswell Electroplating, Lyons, N.Y.).
Comparative Example C was identical to Comparative Example B, except that a green rouge bar buffing compound (Green Rouge SSBC5, obtained from Caswell Electroplating, Lyons, N.Y.) was substituted for the jeweler's rouge.
Comparative Example D was identical to Comparative Example B, except that a blue rouge buffing compound (Blue Rouge BLUBC5, obtained from Caswell Electroplating, Lyons, N.Y.) was substituted for the jeweler's rouge.
Test Methods
Buffing Test
The Buffing Test measured the efficacy of self-contained fibrous buffing articles and comparative buffing articles to modify the gloss of metallic substrates. Buffing efficacy was determined by the change in light reflectance as measured by a micro gloss meter (model AG-4446, obtained from Byk-Gardner USA, Columbia, Md.).
The work pieces were 12 inch×12 inch (30.5 cm×30.5 cm) sheets of 16 gauge 304 stainless steel, ⅛ inch (3.175 mm) thick 6061 aluminum, and 1/16 inch (1.5875 mm) thick brass alloy 353. Self-contained fibrous buffing articles were prepared for testing by stacking 12 discs of each Example and providing an arbor hole for mounting. Buffing articles of the Comparative Examples were tested as received. All buffing articles were 10 inches (25.4 cm) in diameter.
Buffing articles to be tested were mounted on an electric rotary tool that was disposed over an X-Y table. A stainless steel, aluminum, or brass work piece was secured to the X-Y table. Then the table was set to traverse a 9-inch (23 cm) path at 5.6 inches/sec (14.2 cm/sec) forward in the +X direction and back the same distance and at the same speed in the −X direction, in a back and forth movement for 24 times all together (24 passes), then move 0.25 inch (6.35 mm) in the +Y direction, then traverse a 9-inch (23 cm) path at 5.6 inches/sec (14.2 cm/sec) forward in the +X direction and back the same distance and at the same speed in the −X direction, in a back and forth movement for 16 times (16 passes) all together, then move 0.25 inch (6.35 mm) in the +Y direction, then traverse a 9-inch (23 cm) path at 5.6 inches/sec (14.2 cm/sec) forward in the +X direction and back the same distance and at the same speed in the −X direction, in a back and forth movement for 8 times (8 passes) all together, then move 0.25 inch (6.35 mm) in the +Y direction, then traverse a 9-inch (23 cm) path at 0.6 inches/sec (14.2 cm/sec) forward in the +X direction and back the same distance and at the same speed in the −X direction, in a back and forth movement for 4 times (4 passes) all together, then move 0.25 inch (6.35 mm) in the +Y direction, then traverse a 9-inch (23 cm) path at 5.6 inches/sec (14.2 cm/sec) forward in the +X direction and back the same distance and at the same speed in the −X direction, in a back and forth movement for 2 times (2 passes) all together. This combination of motions defined one test cycle. The rotary tool was activated to rotate at 2200 rpm under no load. The buffing article was then urged radially against the work piece at 0.5 psi (3.45 kPa) with its axis of rotation parallel to the X direction and the X-Y table was activated to move through the prescribed path.
Each buffing article was tested for 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 cycles. A 20-degree gloss was measured after 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 cycles. The 20-degree gloss after 24 test cycles for inventive and comparative articles is shown in Table 9. Incremental gloss change after 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 cycles for inventive and comparative articles is shown in
TABLE 9
GLOSS RESULTS
Gloss units
Example
Stainless Steel
Aluminum
Brass
1
1082
1474
1496
2
1116
1424
1485
3
1061
n.d.1
n.d.1
4
n.d.1
1505
1534
Comp. A
973
n.d.1
n.d.1
Comp. B
1007
1158
1414
Comp. C
1024
1257
1384
Comp D
n.d.1
1504
1397
1n.d. = not determined
Cut and Transfer Test:
Four pre-weighed 203 mm (8 in) circular discs having a center hole of 31.75 mm (1.25 in) and a thickness of 3.2 mm (0.125 in) of the self-contained buffing material were mounted on an arbor between two 89 mm (3.5 in) flanges with three raised projections equally spaced around the flange periphery approximately 19 mm (0.75 in) in width and 16 mm deep (0.63 in) extending 9.5 mm (0.375 in) from the flange face. The projections on opposite flanges were spaced such that upon tightening of the arbor nut caused the discs to flute in an oscillating pattern around the disc periphery. The mechanically driven, variable speed lathe was adjusted to have the revolutions per minute of the arbor adjusted to generate a test speed of 1829 surface meters per minute (6000 surface feet per minute) at the outer edge of the discs. A 304 stainless steel coupon approximately 127 mm (4 in) wide×280 mm (11 in) long×1.5 mm (0.06 in) thick was prefinished with a random orbital disc sander and 100 grit aluminum oxide coated abrasive. The 304 stainless steel, pre-weighed test coupon was mounted in a test carriage and brought horizontally against the rotating discs such that the discs contacted the test specimen at a force of 31 Newtons (7 lbf). The carriage was oscillated tangentially up and down with a stroke length of 152 mm (6 in) and a stroke speed of 76 mm/sec (3 in/sec). Contact between the rotating discs and test coupon was maintained for 10 seconds, after which time contact was removed for 10 seconds. This sequence was repeated 10 times during a test sequence and the sequence was repeated four times. After the fourth sequence the test coupon was weighed upon removal, cleaned with solvent and weighed again. The difference between the initial weight prior to the test and cleaned weight was recorded as cut and the difference between the weight after testing and cleaned weight was recorded as material transfer. A 20-degree gloss was measured after the 4 cycles.
Table 10 shows the results of the Cut and Transfer test along with the percentages of stearic acid, glycerin and mineral oil as a total of the three ingredients and the buffing material density. The % stearic acid is calculated by dividing the % stearic acid in the mix shown in Tables 5-7 divided by the sum of the percentages for the stearic acid, glycerin and mineral oil. The % glycerin and % mineral oil are calculated in a similar manner. This allows an analysis of the three part mixture on performance. Location of the points on a triangular design plot is shown in
TABLE 10
Cut And Transfer Results
20 -
%
%
Cut
Transfer
Degree
Stearic
%
Mineral
Density
(g)
(g)
Gloss
Acid
Glycerin
Oil
g/cm3
Example 4
0.94
0.52
979
63*
29*
8*
0.38
Example 5
0.49
0.16
NA
63
29
8
0.45
Example 6
0.59
0.21
NA
63
29
8
0.36
Example 7
0.75
0.29
NA
63
29
8
0.30
Example 8
0.53
0.19
NA
63
29
8
0.34
Example 9
1.25
0.54
NA
63
5
32
0.34
Example 10
0.78
0.75
NA
39
29
32
0.36
Example 11
0.34
0.39
NA
39
53
8
0.36
Example 12
0.93
0.11
NA
87
5
8
0.36
Example 13
1.46
0.29
963
75
15
10
0.36
Example 14
0.87
0.04
1053
75
15
10
0.35
Example 15
0.6
0.01
1097
75
15
10
0.33
*for Coatings 2-4
Other modifications and variations to the present disclosure may be practiced by those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, which is more particularly set forth in the appended claims. It is understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged in whole or part or combined with other aspects of the various embodiments. All cited references, patents, or patent applications in the above application for letters patent are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety in a consistent manner. In the event of inconsistencies or contradictions between portions of the incorporated references and this application, the information in the preceding description shall control. The preceding description, given in order to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the claimed disclosure, is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the disclosure, which is defined by the claims and all equivalents thereto.
Martinez, Jaime A., Moren, Louis S., Mevissen, Scott M., Kaur, Jasmeet
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11292102, | Dec 29 2017 | SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC; SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIFS | Abrasive buffing articles |
| 9623541, | Dec 24 2014 | SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC; SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIFS | Abrasive flap wheels including hybrid fabrics |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 1954655, | |||
| 1976380, | |||
| 2004623, | |||
| 2106610, | |||
| 2767524, | |||
| 3080689, | |||
| 3120724, | |||
| 3529945, | |||
| 3653859, | |||
| 3991526, | May 12 1975 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Synthetic fibrous buff |
| 4839005, | May 22 1987 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho | Electrolytic-abrasive polishing method of aluminum surface |
| 4842619, | Dec 11 1987 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, SAINT PAUL, MN A CORP OF DE | Glass polishing article |
| 4903440, | Nov 23 1988 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA A CORP OF DE | Abrasive product having binder comprising an aminoplast resin |
| 5178646, | Jan 22 1992 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Coatable thermally curable binder presursor solutions modified with a reactive diluent, abrasive articles incorporating same, and methods of making said abrasive articles |
| 5346516, | Sep 16 1993 | Tepco, Ltd. | Non-woven abrasive material containing hydrogenated vegetable oils |
| 5378251, | Feb 06 1991 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Abrasive articles and methods of making and using same |
| 5554068, | Dec 13 1994 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Abrasive flap brush and method and apparatus for making same |
| 5700302, | Mar 15 1996 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Radiation curable abrasive article with tie coat and method |
| 5725617, | Oct 07 1994 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Abrasive articles with encapsulated lubricant |
| 5942015, | Sep 16 1997 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive slurries and abrasive articles comprising multiple abrasive particle grades |
| 5973892, | Apr 19 1995 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Head cleaner for magnetic recording/reproducing apparatus having a cleaning roller with abrading capability |
| 6069776, | Apr 19 1995 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Tubular rotary head cleaner having a non-woven fabric for a magnetic recording and/or reproducing apparatus |
| 6258138, | May 01 1998 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Coated abrasive article |
| 6352567, | Feb 25 2000 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Nonwoven abrasive articles and methods |
| 6645263, | May 22 2001 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Cellular abrasive article |
| 6672952, | Dec 23 1998 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Tearable abrasive article |
| 7160183, | Oct 31 2000 | Jason Incorporated | Buffing tools and methods of making |
| 20030194962, | |||
| 20070010828, | |||
| 20080167597, | |||
| 20100159805, | |||
| 20100248592, | |||
| 20130345721, | |||
| DE2720829, | |||
| EP1046466, | |||
| JP2007290061, | |||
| JP59001169, | |||
| JP62084968, | |||
| JP9254041, | |||
| WO2005110675, | |||
| WO2012082395, | |||
| WO2012082396, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jun 13 2012 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Nov 11 2013 | MOREN, LOUIS S | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031640 | /0288 | |
| Nov 11 2013 | MEVISSEN, SCOTT M | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031640 | /0288 | |
| Nov 11 2013 | MARTINEZ, JAIME A | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031640 | /0288 | |
| Nov 14 2013 | KAUR, JASMEET | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031640 | /0288 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Feb 07 2019 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jan 20 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Aug 18 2018 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 18 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 18 2019 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Aug 18 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Aug 18 2022 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 18 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 18 2023 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Aug 18 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Aug 18 2026 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 18 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 18 2027 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Aug 18 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |