A composition for use in investment casting shells and a method of making the composition is disclosed. The composition includes an engineered binder and a refractory flour. The engineered binder comprises a siliceous material and at least one organic component selected from: at least one type of wood pulp; at least one species of cellulose fiber; and combinations thereof. A particular benefit of the investment shell composition is simultaneously increased permeability and load bearing capacity.
|
1. A composition for use in investment casting consisting of:
an engineered binder comprising colloidal silica, a polymer, wood pulp, and water; and
refractory flour;
wherein the engineered binder is present in the composition at a concentration of from about 5 wt % to 38 wt % based on the composition, and
the wood pulp comprises fibers having an average length of from about 0.005 mm to about 100 mm, and an average diameter of from about 1 μm to about 100 μm.
2. The composition of
3. The composition of
4. The composition of
5. The composition of
6. The composition of
7. The composition of
8. The composition of
9. The composition of
10. The composition of
11. The composition of
12. The composition of
13. The composition of
14. The composition of
15. The composition of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This invention relates generally to novel compositions for use in investment casting. More specifically, the invention relates to such compositions comprising an organic component added to the binder or slurry which provides improved characteristics. The invention has particular relevance to the production of investment casting shells having an organic component that exhibit increased permeability and higher load bearing capacity.
Investment casting, which is also known as lost wax, lost pattern, and precision casting, is used to produce high quality jointless metal articles that meet relatively close dimensional tolerances. Typically, an investment casting is made by first fabricating a thin-walled ceramic mold as a negative of the article to be made. Molten metal is then introduced to this mold, which is also known as an investment casting shell. Shells are constructed by first making a facsimile or pattern from a disposable substrate of the metal object to be made by investment casting. Suitable meltable substrate materials include, for example, wax, polystyrene, or some plastics. Other disposable materials that vaporize or burn off completely are also used to form these patterns.
A ceramic shell is then formed around the disposable pattern. This shell formation is accomplished first by dipping the pattern into slurry made of a mixture of liquid refractory binders such as colloidal silica or ethyl silicate, and a refractory powder such as quartz, fused silica, zircon, alumina, and aluminosilicate. Then, relatively coarser dry refractory grains, known as stucco, are sifted on the freshly dipped pattern and air-dried. The process of dipping, stuccoing, and air-drying is repeated until a desired thickness is achieved. The shells are built up to a thickness in the range of ⅛ to about ½ inch. No stucco is commonly applied to the final slurry coat, called the seal coat. The green shell is then thoroughly air-dried.
The disposable pattern is then removed using methods that do not exert excessive pressure to the green shell, which commonly include steam autoclaving and flash firing. During autoclaving and flash firing, the pattern is melted away leaving only the shell and any residual substrate material. The shell is then heated to a temperature high enough to combust the residual organic substrate material and sinter the ceramic mold. The hot mold is then filled with molten metal. Various methods are used to introduce molten metal into shells including gravity, pressure, vacuum, and centrifugal force. When the metal in the casting mold has solidified and the shell has cooled sufficiently, the ceramic mold is broken away and the casting is separated.
Investment casting has been practiced for generations. But its continuous growth stems from the demand for producing more complicated parts with intricate design. This demand is driving the industry to develop new ways to make investment casting shells that generate fewer defects and can be produced with higher efficiency and cost effectiveness. Such efforts have resulted in the development of engineered shell systems and the addition of polymers, fibers, and other additives that have significantly improved the quality of the shells produced today. For example, the wide distribution refractory flour system has increased the slurry solids content thereby reducing drying time with improved shell strength. Fiber addition made it possible to build corners and edges more uniformly. Polymer addition has reduced pre-fire shell cracking from drying and handling. Most of these improvements are concentrated on the refractory flour. With exception to polymer addition, the same binders have been used in investment casting for the last several decades.
Polymer, glass, and ceramic fibers currently used in investment casting shells help build uniform edges with virtually no increase in shell strength and permeability. The bond between these fibers and the matrix is primarily physical and relatively weak. The engineered flour systems often use wide size distribution flour particles, which allow raising the slurry solids and produce relatively dense shells with comparatively lower permeability. Currently, a small amount of coarser microsilica is added to build thicker shell and improve permeability, which diminishes some shell strength. Shell strength and permeability inversely affect shell physical properties.
There thus exists and industrial need for investment casting shells having increased shell strength and improved permeability.
The present invention accordingly provides an engineered binder having an organic additive that chemically bonds with a siliceous component to help create the final investment casting shell composite of refractory flour and engineered binder.
Such chemical bonding between the engineered binder and the organic additive significantly strengthens the binder-flour composite, while imparting the benefits of uniform edge building (currently obtained from plastic or glass fiber addition) and improved shell permeability.
In an aspect, this invention is a composition for use in investment casting shells. The composition includes two essential components of an engineered binder and refractory flour. Within the engineered binder is at least one type of wood pulp, at least one species of cellulose fiber, or a combination thereof.
In another aspect, the present invention is a method of forming a composition for use in investment casting shells. The method includes coating an expendable pattern with a refractory slurry to create a coated pattern; stuccoing the coated pattern to create a first layer; drying the first layer sufficiently to apply another coat of refractory slurry and coating with stucco to create a second layer; and optionally repeating the preceding steps at least once to create subsequent layers; wherein at least one of said layers comprises the at least one organic component.
It is an advantage of the invention to provide a novel investment casting shell composition that includes an organic component.
It is another advantage of the invention to provide a novel investment casting shell composition that simultaneously displays increased permeability, higher load bearing capacity, and equal or better dewaxing performance compared to currently available commercial slurries.
It is a further advantage of the invention to provide investment-casting slurries that are thixotropic and perform unexpectedly better than the current commercial slurries, including slurries having fibers and those that are fiber-free and those containing microsilica or without microsilica.
It is yet another advantage of the invention to provide improvements imparted in building investment casting shell molds including uniformity in thickness, more rapid shell building, excellent coverage in holes, corners, and details of the casting parts, with equal or reduced drainage time compared to currently offered commercial slurries made with or without the fibers and microsilica.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter that form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other embodiments for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent embodiments do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims
The present invention is directed toward an engineered binder system for investment casting applications that is preferably present in an investment casting shell in a range from about 5 wt % to about 50 wt %. Investment casting binder can be a number of different siliceous materials further being blended with, for example, a polymer according to embodiments. In accordance with the invention, at least one organic additive is used to engineer the binder system. The presence of the organic additive simultaneously increases shell tensile strength and load bearing capacity while improving shell permeability, which is contrary to commonly observed behavior and one having skill in the art would not expect these two characteristics to coexist. Shell strength and shell permeability are known in the art to be inversely related. Shells having higher open porosity are expected to be more permeable with a simultaneous loss of tensile properties.
The tensile strength enhancement is thought to be derived from the hydrogen bonding between the silica and cellulose of the organic additive. In various embodiments of the invention, the organic additive may be at least one type of wood pulp or at least one species of cellulose or cellulosic material. Wood pulps, in particular, offer unique topochemical and structural properties that are well-suited for use in many products. They typically have layered structures of heterogeneously distributed cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, and other minor components. The cellulose is organized into both crystalline and amorphous regions that are generally oriented longitudinally along the long axis of the fibers. The cellulose regions are surrounded by hemicelluloses that act as a buffer between the crystalline areas and to maintain ductility.
For example, dry wood pulp is comprised of hollow cellulose fibers having chemically active inner and outer surfaces that imbibe colloidal silica or binder and chemically bond with silica both within the core and the outer surface. In addition to the chemical anchoring, cellulose also physically bonds to the matrix. However, such chemical anchoring is absent for the organic and inorganic synthetic fibers currently used in investment casting. These latter fibers have only outer surfaces that are available for bonding. Additionally, the swelling nature of cellulose makes the slurry equally or more thixotropic than the engineered shell systems currently used, while simultaneously resulting in thicker shells with equal or more uniform edges. During heating, the cellulose fibers are burned off leaving a cylindrical hollow core that also improves shell permeability. These benefits are mutually exclusive and not available in any particular system currently in use in the art. However, with the engineered binders system of the invention, these benefits are simultaneously and unexpectedly achieved in a single system.
In embodiments, the wood pulp component of the engineered binder is selected from at least one of the following: hardwood pulp; softwood pulp; and combinations thereof. Wood pulps are classified into different categories based on broad species groups (e.g., hardwoods and softwoods), the type of pulping process (e.g., thermomechanical, chemi-thermomechanical, sulfite, kraft, etc.) used, and whether bleached after pulping. Pulping and bleaching selectively remove polymeric components that are present in the native wood yielding fibrous material with various polymeric compositions that are suited for various applications. Hardwoods and softwoods are most easily distinguished by the length and weighted average of the fibrous product: approximately 0.005 to 5.0 mm for hardwoods and 0.01 to 10.0 mm for softwoods. It is preferred that the hardwood fibers are 0.05 to 1.5 mm in length and softwood fibers are 0.05 to 4.0 mm in length. The diameters may vary between 2 to 60 μm for hardwood and 2 to 80 μm for softwood. It is preferred that the diameter be 5 to 40 μm for hardwood and 5 to 50 μm for softwood. Representative hardwoods include various species of Aspen, Beech, Birch, Oak, Poplar, Maple, Eucalyptus, etc. Representative softwoods include various species of Fir, Spruce, Pine, Cedar, etc. Any suitable wood pulp may be utilized in this invention and it should be appreciated that only representative types of wood pulp are described herein.
In embodiments, the wood pulp may be bleached or unbleached and pulped chemically, mechanically, or thermomechanically, chemi-thermomechanically, sulfate or kraft processes, or unpulped natural wood fibers. The wood pulp may comprise dry or wet fibers, and may be fluffed, powdery, or in the form of board. In alternative forms, the wood pulp may be virgin or recycled paper from newspaper, copy and printing papers, magazines, and boards of different kinds known in the art.
In embodiments, the cellulose fiber species is selected from at least one of the following: bamboo; cotton; cotton linters; bagasse; esparto; kenaf; jute; hemp; papyrus; flax; sisal; straw; rice; wheat; maize-derived cellulose; the like; and combinations thereof. The average length of the fibrous cellulose generally varies between about 0.005 mm and about 100 mm and average diameter typically varies between about 1 and about 100 μm. Cellulose and hemicellulose fibers can be non-naturally occurring. These fibers are not typically formed in nature, but are derived through various chemical processes known in the art. As an example, cellulose in naturally occurring wood pulp can be solubilized and spun into fibers. A similar process can be used to form hemicellulose fibers. Although derived from natural material, these fibers are non-natural as they are not normally found in nature in this form.
The organic component is preferably present in the engineered binder in a range from about 0.05 wt % to about 30 wt %. Preferably, the organic component of wood pulp and/or cellulose fiber is present in an amount sufficient to make the refractory slurry thixotropic, build uniformly thicker investment casting shells, improve permeability, and increase load-bearing capacity. In various embodiments, the organic component is present from about 0.05 wt % to about 15 wt %, but may also be used at levels ranging from about 0.1 wt % to about 1 wt %. Fibers in the organic component typically have an average length from about 0.005 mm to about 100 mm or from about 0.01 mm to about 20 mm, and an average diameter from about 1 μm to about 100 μm.
In embodiments, the wood pulp or cellulose fiber of the engineered binder also comprises at least one other fiber selected from the following: at least one organic fiber; at least one inorganic fiber; the like; and combinations thereof. Representative other fibers include polypropylene; nylon; rayon; ceramic; glass; the like; and combinations thereof.
In embodiments, the engineered binder further comprises at least one of the following: at least one polymer; at least one biocide; at least one fungicide; at least one defoamer; at least one dispersant; water; the like; and combinations thereof.
In embodiments, dried pulp is used that is either fluffy or in the form of thick boards (sometimes referred to as market pulp). When suspended in water, colloidal silica with or without polymer, or in investment casting slurries, such dried pulp imbibes the surrounding liquid, swells, and disperses. That is, market pulp is repulped in such a process. Although repulping in colloidal or colloidal-polymer blend is preferred, wood pulp improves shell characteristics at varying degrees irrespective of the process used in introducing it to the slurry.
According to alternative embodiments, the siliceous material components may be selected from at least one of the following: colloidal silica; a blend of colloidal silica and a polymer; a blend of colloidal silica, a polymer, and water; colloidal silica and water; the like; and combinations thereof. In a case where colloidal silica is selected as the siliceous material, the colloidal silica comprises at least one of the following: ethyl silicate; fumed silica; ionic silicates; precipitated silica; the like; and combinations thereof.
In embodiments where a polymer is used in the investment casting shell, the polymer may be selected from at least one polymer comprising at least one of the following monomers: acrylic acid; acrylic esters; methacrylic acid; methacrylic esters; styrene butadiene; vinyl chloride; vinyl acetate; the like; and combinations thereof.
In embodiments, the refractory slurry, flour, and/or the stucco comprises the organic component.
In an embodiment, the refractory slurry is thixotropic in at least one layer.
In various embodiments, the investment casting shell is formed through at least one of the following steps: (i) mixing the siliceous material and the at least one organic component; (ii) mixing the at least one organic component with a slurry, wherein the at least one organic component is present in the slurry from about 0.01 wt % to about 20 wt %, based on a total mass of the slurry; and (iii) mixing the at least one organic component with the refractory flour to form a blend followed by adding the blend to a slurry, wherein the at least one organic component is present in the slurry from about 0.01 wt % to about 20 wt %, based on a total mass of the mixed slurry; (iv) mixing the at least one organic component with a polymer to form a polymer blend followed by adding the polymer blend to a slurry, wherein the at least one organic component is present in the slurry from about 0.01 wt % to about 20 wt %, based on a total mass of the slurry; and (v) repulping the at least one organic component in an aqueous solvent followed by adding the repulped organic component to a slurry, wherein the at least one organic component is present in the slurry from about 0.01 wt % to about 20 wt %, based on a total mass of the slurry; or any combination thereof.
In an embodiment, the investment casting shell is formed through the following method: (i) coating an expendable pattern with a refractory slurry to create a coated pattern; (ii) stuccoing the coated pattern to create a first layer; (iii) drying the first layer sufficiently to apply another coat of refractory slurry and coating with stucco to create a second layer; and (iv) optionally repeating the preceding steps at least once to create subsequent layers; wherein at least one of said layers comprises the at least one organic component. The foregoing steps (i) to (iv) are repeated until a desired thickness is achieved for the investment casting shell.
The organic component may be introduced into the engineered binder prior to making slurry. It can also be introduced directly to the slurry to partially attain the characteristics of the shells made with engineered binder system. Alternatively, it can be introduced into the slurry by other means generally known to those skilled in the art, such as dry blending with refractory flour, blending with stucco, blending with polymer or spraying directly after dipping.
Refractory flour for use in the present invention may be any suitable refractory flour as known in the art. Typically, refractory flour comprises a particle size from about 0.5 μm to about 1 mm. Representative refractory flour comprises at least one of the following: fused silica; aluminosilicate; alumina; zirconium silicate; microsilica; zirconia; yttira; quartz; carbon; and combinations thereof.
In an embodiment, the investment casting shell mold of the invention comprises an organic component (e.g., wood pulp or cellulose fibers) wherein the green shell is built by successive coating of slurry and stucco wherein the wood pulp or cellulose fibers are present at a level that effectively makes the slurry thixotropic, builds uniformly thicker shells, improves permeability, and increases load-bearing capacity.
In embodiments, an expendable pattern is repeatedly coated with slurry and stucco wherein the flour contains an organic component (e.g., wood pulp or cellulose fibers). In other embodiments, an expendable pattern is repeatedly coated with slurry and stucco wherein the stucco contains an organic component (e.g., wood pulp or cellulose fibers).
In alternative embodiments, the investment casting shell of the invention is made with at least one slurry layer containing the engineered binder made with wood pulp or cellulose fibers; with at least one slurry layer containing refractory flour that has wood pulp or cellulose fibers; with at least one stucco layer containing wood pulp or cellulose fibers; or any combination thereof.
The foregoing may be better understood by reference to the following examples, which are intended for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or its application in any way. The examples given below include both laboratory-scale and plant-scale evaluations. Both evaluations are conducted with widely used commercial engineered flour systems as controls.
Investment casting slurries were prepared by mixing binder (a blend of colloidal silica and styrene butadiene (SBR) latex) and silica flour to which dry fluffy pulp was added. Three slurries made with the same binder are shown in this example. Slurry 1-1 was the control made with Gray Matter (GM) II flour, which is a commercially available wide distribution fused silica flour system containing coarse microsilica and synthetic organic fibers as additives. Coarse microsilica addition improves shell permeability and fiber addition builds better corners and edges. This investigation was conducted to evaluate wide distribution flour systems containing wood pulp without microsilica and synthetic fibers. Slurry 1-2 was made with the same fused silica flour system and synthetic organic fibers as in GM II but without the microsilica. Slurry 1-3 was made with the same fused silica flour as in GM II but without the synthetic organic fibers and microsilica. Dry wood pulp was gradually added directly to Slurries 1-2 and 1-3 until the slurry viscosity and plate weights were matched with that of Slurry 1-1.
TABLE 1
Slurry Formulation
Slurry formulation* (wt. %)
Slurry 1-1
(GM II control)
Slurry 1-2
Slurry 1-3
Binder
36.0
36.4
36.8
Silica flour
63.8
63.3
63.0
(with microsilica)
(no microsilica)
(no microsilica)
Synthetic organic
0.2
0.2
—
fibers
Dry softwood pulp
—
0.1
0.2
Total solids in slurry
75.7
75.4
75.2
*Viscosity of all three slurries was maintained the same.
Tensile properties and permeability of the shells made with these three slurries were measured. Tensile properties were evaluated by measuring the modulus of rupture (MOR) of shells built on expendable wax patterns (6 in. length, 1 in. width, and 0.125 in. thickness). Multiple bars were prepared for each of the three slurries without a prime coat and shell tensile strengths were measured in two conditions. Green strength was measured on air-dried shells at room temperature. Hot strength was measured in hot conditions after the shells were heated at 982° C. for one hour. Shell permeability was measured by building shells on expendable Ping-Pong balls attached to quartz tubes. Like MOR bars, multiple permeability balls were built with the same number of coats and without a prime coat. The balls were heated to 982° C. for one hour when nitrogen gas was passed through the quartz tube at various pressures and nitrogen flow through the shells was measured.
Green and hot MOR, AFL (adjusted fractured load, the breaking load at fracture normalized for one inch sample width), shell thickness, and dry shell weight are shown in Table 2. Shell permeability results are shown in Table 3. A higher MOR value was achieved for samples with higher tensile strength, an important shell characteristic. However, AFL is even more important, as it is the load that a shell can withstand before breaking. AFL is especially critical to prevent leaks when hot liquid metal is poured for casting. Higher the flow meter readings indicate higher shell permeability. These two characteristics are particularly desirable in investment casting shells.
The data show that the addition of the wood pulp increased shell strength and simultaneously improved the permeability. Shell strength normally decreases as it becomes more permeable thus the observed result was surprising and unexpected. The control slurry (GM II) was engineered with microsilica for improved shell build with higher permeability. However, the presence of wood pulp enhanced shell strength significantly while improved permeability and shell build of the flour system that was otherwise less permeable with poor shell build.
TABLE 2
Shell Physical Properties
Green Strength
Hot Strength
Slurry
MOR,
AFL,
MOR,
AFL,
Thick-
Dry shell
Formulation
psi
lb
psi
lb
ness, in.
wt., g
Slurry 2-1
660
19.6
1270
35.5
0.29
269.8
(control)
Slurry 2-2
920
27.9
1420
39.6
0.30
271.7
Slurry 2-3
890
27.6
1550
47.9
0.31
263.3
MOR = Modulus of rupture, AFL = Adjusted fracture load (fracture load at unit width)
TABLE 3
Shell Permeability at 982° C.
Pressure of N2 gas, psi
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Average Flow Meter Readings
Slurry 2-1 (control)
31.0
47.8
62.0
73.5
88.0
Slurry 2-2
41.6
62.1
78.3
100.0
Slurry 2-3
41.3
60.9
78.3
96.8
The samples in this example were prepared by adding dry fluffy wood pulp to the slurry, as in Example 1. This investigation evaluates performance of shells containing softwood pulp in the presence and absence of synthetic fibers. Evaluation of hardwood pulp is also introduced in this example. Like in Example 1, the flour in Slurry 2-1 was again GM II as control. Slurries 2-2 and 2-4 made with softwood pulp were similar to that in Example 1. Slurry 2-3 was made with dried hardwood pulp. The physical properties were again very similar to those in Example 1. The slurry and shell physical characteristics are shown in Tables 5 through 7. Shells made with both softwood and hardwood pulps performed very similarly, although their respective amounts in the slurry were slightly different. These shells were made without a prime coat.
TABLE 4
Slurry Formulation
Slurry formulation* (wt. %)
Slurry 2-1
(GM II control)
Slurry 2-2
Slurry 2-3
Slurry 2-4
Binder
35.9
36.1
36.1
36.6
Silica flour
63.9
63.6
63.5
63.2
(with
(without
(without
(without
microsilica)
microsilica)
microsilica)
microsilica)
Synthetic
0.2
0.2
0.2
—
organic
fibers
Dry soft-
—
0.1
—
0.2
wood pulp
Dry hard-
—
—
0.2
—
wood pulp
Total solids
75.5
75.3
75.3
74.9
in slurry
*Viscosity of all four slurries is maintained the same
TABLE 5
Shell Properties
Green strength
Fired strength
Hot strength
Slurry
MOR
AFL
MOR
AFL
MOR
AFL,
Dry shell
Formulation
psi
lbs
psi
lbs
psi
lbs
Thickness, in.
wt. g
Slurry 2-1
721
22.1
515
14.0
1331
34.4
0.30
256
(control)
Slurry 2-2
937
27.7
875
25.0
1619
46.0
0.30
249
Slurry 2-3
954
25.8
833
24.7
1502
40.7
0.29
260
Slurry 2-4
978
32.7
783
24.8
1602
49.8
0.32
238
TABLE 6
Shell Permeability (flow of nitrogen through the shell) at 982° C.
Pressure of N2 gas, psi
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Average Flow Meter Readings
Slurry 2-1 (control)
39.3
57.9
74.6
95.7
—
Slurry 3-1
43.9
65.5
84.1
>100
—
Slurry 3-3
45.1
66.8
88.0
>100
—
Slurry 3-4
40.0
59.1
75.0
96.1
—
The pulp addition process in this example was different from Examples 1 and 2. Both hardwood and softwood were repulped in either colloidal or binder (a mixture of colloidal and SBR latex). Flour was then added to the binder containing the pulp and mixed to prepare the slurry. When repulped in colloidal silica, an equivalent amount of polymer was added to the slurry and achieved a similar slurry formulation. This evaluation compared repulping in colloidal vs. binder followed by flour addition. The slurry and shell physical characteristics are shown in Tables 7 through 9. These were backup shells without a primer coat. The observed characteristics were similar to those of the cellulose systems shown above in Examples 1 and 2.
TABLE 7
Slurry Formulation
Slurry formulation* (wt. %)
Slurry 3-1
Slurry 3-2
Slurry 3-3
Slurry 3-4
Binder
37.6
36.5
35.6
35.9
Fused silica flour
62.2
63.2
64.2
63.8
Softwood repulped in
0.2
binder
Hardwood repulped in
0.3
binder
Softwood repulped in
0.2
colloidal
Hardwood repulped in
0.3
colloidal
Total solids in slurry
74.6
75.4
76.0
75.8
*Viscosity of all four slurries is maintained the same
TABLE 8
Shell Properties
Green strength
Hot strength
Slurry
MOR
AFL
MOR
AFL,
Thick-
Dry shell
Formulation
psi
lbs
psi
lbs
ness, in.
wt. g
Slurry 3-1
940
35.3
1596
53.1
0.32
253
Slurry 3-2
963
32.2
1698
53.9
0.31
256
Slurry 3-3
977
32.1
1702
48.9
0.30
244
Slurry 3-4
979
30.3
1621
49.8
0.30
258
TABLE 9
Shell Permeability (flow of nitrogen through the shell) at 982° C.
Pressure of N2 gas, psi
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Average Flow Meter Readings
Slurry 3-1
41.4
65.4
87.6
>100
Slurry 3-1
38.0
60.0
78.4
>100
Slurry 3-3
36.8
57.3
75.1
97.9
Slurry 3-4
38.1
60.5
79.0
>100
Plant evaluations were conducted to corroborate the laboratory observations and to compare the performances during autoclave and metal pouring with the existing system in the plant as control. This plant used WDS III, a fiber-free wide distribution engineered fused silica flour system that contains coarse microsilica as an additive for improved shell permeability. The binder for the control slurry was a blend of large particle colloidal silica and SBR latex.
Performance of two test slurries was evaluated in this trial. The flour in these two slurries was the same wide distribution fused silica system used for control but without the microsilica additive. The binders for the two slurries were different—softwood was repulped in one and hardwood in another. The base binder was the same for all three slurries. The viscosity of all three slurries was kept identical during shell building. These slurries were used only for backup and seal coats. The prime and intermediate slurries and the stuccos were identical for all parts made.
Three different parts were made in this evaluation All shells had one prime and an intermediate coat. The number of backup coats varied between 4 and 5 depending on the part, and each part had a seal coat. The slurry formulation is shown in Table 10. The physical characteristics of the shells are shown in Tables 11, 12, and 13.
TABLE 10
Slurry Formulation
Slurry formulation* (wt. %)
Softwood
Hardwood
Control slurry
repulped
repulped
(WDS III)
in binder
in binder
Binder
37.3
37.7
37.5
Silica flour
62.8
62.0
62.1
(with microsilica)
Softwood repulped in binder
—
0.3
Hardwood repulped in binder
0.4
Total solids in slurry
74.1
74.2
74.0
*Viscosity of all four slurries is maintained the same
TABLE 11
Shell Properties
Green strength
Fired strength
Hot strength
Slurry
MOR
AFL
MOR
AFL
MOR
AFL,
Thick-
Formulation
psi
lbs
psi
lbs
psi
lbs
ness, in.
WDS III
685
13.1
—
—
1042
20.9
0.240
Softwood
733
17.2
679
14.3
1270
29.5
0.265
Hardwood
753
16.0
761
15.3
1204
26.6
0.252
TABLE 12
Shell Permeability (flow of nitrogen through the shell) at 982° C.
Pressure of N2 gas, psi
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Average Flow Meter Readings
Control
27.1
44.2
57.7
71.3
85.0
96.0
Softwood
25.3
40.7
53.0
65.2
76.4
85.9
Hardwood
26.3
42.8
55.3
68.6
80.8
93.3
TABLE 13
Average mold mass (lb) of three parts produced in plant evaluation
Slurry Type
Door Handles
Nail Guns
Tank Pipe
WDS III
21.95
23.26
22.59
Softwood
23.38
24.69
24.41
Hardwood
23.09
24.24
24.04
TABLE 14
Autoclave crack evaluation for tank pipe parts
Average length
Slurry Type
Cracks per part
per crack, in.
WDS III
1.00
8.3
Softwood repulped in binder
0.90
6.7
Hardwood repulped in binder
0.95
7.6
The data presented from the plant evaluation clearly showed the following advantages of using wood pulp in investment casting: (i) wood pulp produced thicker shells resulting in faster shell build. This is also reflected by the higher mold mass in the presence of wood pulp; (ii) shells containing wood pulp were stronger as shown by higher MOR and AFL; (iii) similarities in permeability of all three shells supports the concept that imperviousness of the prime coat determines the overall shell permeability as all shells in the evaluation had one identical prime coat; (iv) the lab-made shells containing wood pulp made without prime coats were more permeable, as shown in the Examples 1 and 2; (v) the superior physical characteristics corroborate the observation of shorter and less cracking during autoclaving; and (vi) no shells leaked during metal pouring and knockout was identical for all three types of shell.
All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While this invention may be embodied in many different forms, there are described in detail herein specific preferred embodiments of the invention. The present disclosure is an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiments illustrated. In addition, unless expressly stated to the contrary, use of the term “a” is intended to include “at least one” or “one or more.” For example, “a device” is intended to include “at least one device” or “one or more devices.”
Any ranges given either in absolute terms or in approximate terms are intended to encompass both, and any definitions used herein are intended to be clarifying and not limiting. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Moreover, all ranges disclosed herein are to be understood to encompass any and all subranges (including all fractional and whole values) subsumed therein.
Furthermore, the invention encompasses any and all possible combinations of some or all of the various embodiments described herein. Any and all patents, patent applications, scientific papers, and other references cited in this application, as well as any references cited therein, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. It should also be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10717127, | Oct 28 2016 | IC Ceramic Consulting, LLC | Self-bonding refractories for investment casting slurries and molds derived therefrom |
| 10953460, | Oct 10 2016 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of making investment casting mold |
| 11117186, | Sep 25 2019 | IC Ceramic Consulting, LLC | Powder investment casting binder and molds derived therefrom |
| 11135644, | Oct 28 2016 | IC Ceramic Consulting, LLC | Self-bonding refractories for investment casting slurries and molds derived therefrom |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4063954, | Aug 25 1971 | SELMET, INC | Fluoride-type with heat sink for casting molten reactive and refractory metals |
| 4069859, | Mar 03 1975 | Sato Technical Research Laboratory Ltd. | Direct pouring method using self-fluxing heat-resistant sheets |
| 4247333, | Dec 26 1979 | General Electric Company | Alumina shell molds used for investment casting in directional solidification of eutectic superalloys |
| 4260452, | May 11 1976 | Production of paper pulp from sugar mill bagasse | |
| 4530722, | Oct 13 1982 | HARBORCHEM, INC | Binder and refractory compositions and methods |
| 4572272, | Sep 04 1982 | Rolls-Royce Limited | Method of casting using non-silica based ceramic cores for castings |
| 4925492, | Sep 21 1987 | WYMAN-GORDON INVESTMENT CASTINGS, INC | Ceramic core for investment casting and method for preparation |
| 5280819, | May 09 1990 | Lanxide Technology Company, LP | Methods for making thin metal matrix composite bodies and articles produced thereby |
| 5297615, | Jul 17 1992 | Howmet Research Corporation | Complaint investment casting mold and method |
| 5569320, | Dec 28 1993 | CADIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC | Process for preparing refractory molded articles and binders therefor |
| 5582681, | Jun 29 1994 | The Research Foundation of State University of New York; RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF STATE, THE | Production of soft paper products from old newspaper |
| 6000457, | Jun 26 1998 | Buntrock Industries, Inc.; BUNTROCK INDUSTRIES | Investment casting mold and method of manufacture |
| 6257316, | Feb 11 1998 | Bontrock Industries, Inc. | Investment casting mold and method of manufacture |
| 6450243, | Mar 17 2000 | Buntrock Industries, Inc | Investment casting |
| 6540013, | Jun 07 2001 | Ecolab USA Inc | Method of increasing the strength and solids level of investment casting shells |
| 7004230, | Nov 10 2000 | Buntrock Industries, Inc | Investment casting shells and compositions including rice hull ash |
| 7503379, | Oct 14 2004 | Ecolab USA Inc | Method of improving the removal of investment casting shells |
| 8235092, | Jan 30 2007 | CERADYNE, INC | Insulated investment casting mold and method of making |
| 20030131966, | |||
| 20030168200, | |||
| 20040069429, | |||
| 20040238158, | |||
| 20050199366, | |||
| 20050252632, | |||
| 20060081350, | |||
| 20070151702, | |||
| 20080105401, | |||
| 20110049041, | |||
| 20110114279, | |||
| EP1207975, | |||
| JP2003507189, | |||
| JP2008534286, | |||
| JP3258438, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Dec 08 2010 | Nalco Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Dec 08 2010 | BHATTACHARJA, SANKAR | Nalco Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 025468 | /0853 | |
| Dec 29 2015 | Nalco Company | Nalco Company LLC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 043924 | /0587 | |
| Feb 27 2017 | Nalco Company LLC | Ecolab USA Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044347 | /0104 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Jun 20 2019 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jun 21 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Jan 05 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Jul 05 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jan 05 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Jan 05 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Jan 05 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Jul 05 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jan 05 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Jan 05 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Jan 05 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Jul 05 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jan 05 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Jan 05 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |