A lens processing system used for removing a lens blank (98, 110) from an edging block (40). The system includes an elongated collet (22) that engages the mating edging block (40). The block (40) includes an enlarged groove (41) that receives a pair of blades (65, 66) extended upwardly from the floor (75) of the collet (22). Each lens blank (98,110) is formed to include a series of surface markings (191,192) to verify proper functioning of the edging machine that forms a finished lens. Each lens blank also includes a series of circular markings (117,133) arranged in diagonal rows to verify the accurate drilling of bores with the lens blank (98,110).
|
1. A lens processing system comprising:
(a) an edging block, the edging block being adapted to receive a machined lens;
the edging block further comprising:
(i) a groove, the groove being formed to include sidewalls and a bottom surface;
(ii) a blade, the blade protruding from the bottom surface of the groove and residing within a volume defined by the groove, the blade being adapted to engage a mating structure formed on a collet; and
(iii) a contiguous series of inclined surfaces, the inclined surfaces being shaped and dimensioned to engage some portion of a collet, wherein a circumferential distance occupied by each inclined surface is between seven and eight degrees, thereby causing two adjacent surfaces to span a total included angle of approximately fifteen degrees;
(b) a collet, the collet being adapted to grip the edging block, the collet being adapted to rotate while the machined lens is held in a stationary position, the collet further comprising:
(i) a generally cylindrical sidewall, the generally cylindrical sidewall being partially separated by at least one longitudinal groove;
(ii) a lip;
(iii) a frustoconical transition, the longitudinal groove extending through the frustoconical transition, the frustoconical transition terminating at the lip;
(iv) a turret, the turret adjoining and being integrally formed with the lip, the longitudinal groove extending through the turret, the turret being formed to include a base, an inner wall, an outer wall and a series of columns, the columns being formed on a surface of the inner wall, the columns being substantially equally spaced along a circumference of the inner wall; and
(v) a pair of protruding plates, the plates extending upwardly from the base of the turret, the protruding plates being suitably dimensioned to fit within the groove of edging block, the plates being positioned so as to partially surround the blade extending from the bottom surface of the groove residing in the edging block when the edging block is mated with the collet, the pair of protruding base plates defining a longitudinal axis, an angular distance between adjacent columns being approximately thirty degrees and a greatest angular distance between the longitudinal axis and a farthest adjacent column being approximately twenty degrees;
(c) a calibration lens, the calibration lens being adapted to mount on the edging block, the calibration lens further comprising:
(i) a plurality of linear surface markings; and
(ii) a plurality of circular markings;
(d) a vertical axis;
(e) a horizontal axis, the horizontal axis intersecting the vertical axis; and
(f) a plurality of circular surface markings arranged symmetrically about the vertical axis.
2. The lens processing system of
3. The lens processing system of
4. The lens processing system of
|
This patent application is based on Provisional Patent Application No. 61/707,795, filed on Sep. 28, 2012.
1. Field of Invention
This invention pertains generally to the field of lens fabrication and more particularly to inspecting and processing a lens during manufacture.
2. Description of Prior Art
The fabrication of lenses includes processing steps to generate both lens surfaces in order to impart specific optical properties to the lens, and also to accomplish the peripheral alteration, or edging, of the lenses. The first step in altering a lens is typically the generation of a surface on a partially finished lens blank. The second step in processing the lens is normally the peripheral alteration of the shape of the surfaced lens. The lens blanks and surfaced lenses may be, for example, spherical, cylindrical, optical flats, aspherical, or of multiple focal lengths. Once the lenses have been finished they may be put to a variety of uses such as spectacle lenses, camera lenses, or lenses used in instrumentation.
Edging the lens to obtain a desired shape involves a series of steps. Typically the optical center and the cylinder axis of the lens is located and marked on a surface. Next the lens is attached to a lens block by some type of holding mechanism, such as an adhesive, so that the optical center and the cylinder axis of the lens are aligned with the center point and cylinder axis of the block. The desired peripheral shape is then imparted to the lens via one or more drilling, cutting, milling, grinding or other machining tools.
Typically the lens cutting and shaping tool is a computer controlled programmable device that may be frequently reprogrammed to manufacture a wide variety of lenses. In order to verify proper programming and operation of the lens forming tool, some means of calibration must be provided.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,030, entitled “METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE ANGULAR OFFSET, METHOD FOR CALIBRATING A GRINDING MACHINE FOR OPTHALMIC GLASSES AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT SAID CALIBRATING METHOD” utilizes a reference standard lens of a predetermined known shape.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,668,617 entitled “METHOD OF CALIBRATING AN OPTHALMIC LENS PIERCING MACHINE, DEVICE USED TO IMPLEMENT ONE SUCH METHOD AND OPTHALMIC LENS MACHINING APPARATUS COMPRISING ONE SUCH DEVICE”, uses a template marked with an associated coordinate system. An additional drilling calibration device is used to calculate the difference between the apparent markings on the template and the actual drilling angles needed to create the desired lens.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,847 entitled “METHOD OF CALIBRATING AN OPTHALMIC LENS PROCESSING DEVICE, MACHINE PROGRAMMED THEREFOR, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM”, presents a scheme for comparing the number of holes actually drilled in a lens with the number of holes predicted according to the programming of a drilling device.
Further, some means must be provided to attach the lens blank to the edging block with a bond that will not fail during alteration but that will permit removal once alteration is complete. In practice, the lens may be removed from the edging block by a variety of methods. For example, the lens may be pried from the block. However, this method has the disadvantage that the lens is often chipped, scratched, or otherwise damaged by the act of prying. This method can be facilitated by immersing the lens and block in hot water for a short period of time. However, some plastic lens materials cannot withstand such temperatures.
Another method of lens removal employs a tab that is pulled in the direction of the plane of the blocking pad so as to cause a reduction in the thickness of the pad and a progressive disengagement of the pad from the interface between lens and block. Removal may also be accomplished by placing the combination of lens, blocking pad and block into a cavity of the mounting block and then rotating the lens and the block in opposite directions with respect to each other, thereby causing them to separate. A specially designed hand tool may also be provided to accomplish this same result. The tool is not as wide as the mounting block and facilitates removal by making it easier to grasp the edge of the lens.
The latter method of lens removal is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,962,833 entitled METHOD FOR THE ALTERATION OF A LENS AND AN ADHESIVE LENS BLOCKING PAD USED THEREIN, issued to Johnson on Jun. 15, 1976. The problem with the lens removal method disclosed by Johnson is that an operator must manually and repeatedly grasp pliers or a similar tool to remove the lens. Some level of skill is required to perform the lens removal operation rapidly while avoiding damage to the lens. After a period of time in such an occupation, the operator is likely to suffer various forms of fatigue and injury including, for example, carpal tunnel syndrome.
Another method of lens removal utilizes a device that retains the blocked lens by means of a collet chuck or clamp. An example of such a device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,182,314 entitled AUTOMATED EDGED LENS DEBLOCKING SYSTEM, issued to Goerges on May 22, 2012. The blocked lens resides on a pad which supports the lens on the edging block while protecting the lens from abrasion or damage from the block itself. A pair of opposed movable lens clamps or arms are pneumatically advanced to grip the blocked lens along portions of the lens edge. Once the lens is secured by the lens clamp, the collet chuck is rotated approximately forty five degrees, thereby breaking the bond between the lens and the edging block. The lens clamps may then be retracted away from the lens edges and the lens may be manually removed from the pad.
A problem with the geometry of the '314 device is that repeated use causes wear on the collet chuck that leads to relatively premature failure, particularly when a hydrophobic adhesive pad is applied to an uncoated lens. Use of the hydrophobic pad requires a substantially greater force for lens removal than other pad/lens combinations, thereby accelerating the wear on both the collet and the edge block.
What is needed is a visually verifiable lens template that permits a wide variety of lens parameters to be immediately inspected after a lens machining tool is programmed to create a specific lens. Any error or anomaly in the lens created, and the nature of the corrective action needed, should be apparent by viewing the lens template without further need of a machine based analysis. Further, the edged lens deblocking device must be capable of repeated industrial scale operation without failure.
The current invention is an improved apparatus and method for processing a lens that has undergone an edging procedure, including an improved apparatus for the removal of a lens from an edging block and a means for verifying the integrity and accuracy of the edging process performed on the lens. The edged lens is freed from an adhesive pad by the twisting motion of a collet. Periodically the edged lens is a calibration blank which may be inspected for compliance with the desired edging operations.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a blocked lens is placed on each collet, the collet being formed to include an elongated cylindrical body that mates with an existing deblocking device such as the type described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 8,182,314. The collets are formed with a series of circumferential ribs surrounded by a larger circumferential wall that defines a bore. The edging blocks are formed to include a mating groove structure that accepts protrusions formed within the base of the bore. Some of the edging blocks are periodically affixed to a calibration blank having a series of parallel and intersecting lines, as well as circles or portions of circles, the lines and circles permitting rapid visual inspection of the edging or machining processes performed on the lens. These and other advantages of the present invention will become apparent by referring to the accompanying drawings and the detailed description of the invention.
Referring to
The edging block clamp 13 is intended to mate with an edging block. As seen in
The elongated collet 22 that receives the edging block 40 is depicted in greater detail in
Referring also to
As best seen in
The elongated collet 217 includes a pair of upwardly extending blades 236 and 237 adapted to engage the edging block 40. The elongated collet 217 permits the application of a greater force to an edging block 40 inserted into the turret 218, thereby suppressing movement of the edging block with respect to the inner wall 223 during rotation of the elongated collet. Both the elongated collets 22 and 217 are formed of a metallic alloy manufactured by Hardinge, Inc. of Elmira, N.Y. The inner wall 223 may be coated with a diamond film or surface texture in order to further reduce wear caused by differential motion between the collet and the edging block.
Referring to
The calibration lens blank 98 depicted in
A second embodiment of a calibration lens blank 110 is illustrated in
The first circular marking 113 on lens blank 110 is placed at a distance 114 of approximately 0.610 inch from the vertical axis 111 and at distance 115 of approximately 0.198 inch from the horizontal axis 112. The horizontally adjacent second circular marking 117 is spaced at a distance 118 of approximately 0.753 inch from the vertical axis 111. Vertically offset from the circular markings 113 and 117 is a horizontal row composed of circular markings 120 and 119. The innermost marking 119 resides at a distance 121 of approximately 0.079 inch from the horizontal axis 112 and at a distance 123 of approximately 0.753 inch from the vertical axis 111. The outermost marking 120 is placed at a distance 122 of approximately 0.812 inch from the vertical axis 111. The circular markings 113 and 117 define a first horizontal row, while circular markings 119 and 120 define a second horizontal row.
A third horizontal row of circular markings, residing above the horizontal axis 112, is defined by the circular markings 124 and 125. The marking 124 is displaced a distance 126 of approximately 0.079 inch from the horizontal axis 112 and by a distance 127 of approximately 0.871 inch from the vertical axis 111. Ideally, the distances 121 and 126 are substantially equal. The horizontally adjacent circular marking 125 is displaced by a distance 128 of approximately 0.733 inch from the vertical axis 111.
Markings 124, 125, 129 and 130 define a horizontal row that is symmetrically spaced about the vertical axis 111. The markings 124, 125, 129 and 130 indicate that a single type of lens may be fastened on either a right or left side to a spectacle lens frame, for example. This requirement creates the need for calibration marks that are symmetrical about the single vertical axis 111. A fourth horizontal row is composed of circular markings 131, 132, 133 and 134. Circular marking 131 is displaced a distance 135 from the vertical axis 111 by approximately 0.931 inch. The marking 132 is displaced from the vertical axis 111 by a distance 136 of approximately 0.792 inch. Each of the markings 131, 132, 133 and 134 is displaced from the horizontal axis 112 by a distance 137 of approximately 0.198 inch. The circular markings 113, 119, 125 and 132 form one of four diagonal rows appearing on the calibration lens 110. The four rows of circular markings permit four successive uses of the calibration lens 110, moving inwardly from the outermost hole 131 to the innermost hole 113.
The calibrations lens 110 includes four pairs of horizontal linear markings. The first pair of linear markings is composed of lines 138 and 139 which are spaced apart by a distance 140 of approximately 1.969 inch. The second, adjacent pair of linear markings includes lines 141 and 142 which are separated by a distance 143 of approximately 1.732 inch. The third adjacent pair of linear markings consists of horizontal lines 144 and 145, spaced apart by a distance 146 of approximately 1.309 inch. The innermost pair of horizontal linear markings is formed by lines 147 and 148 which are separated by a distance 149 of approximately 1.084 inch. The four pairs of horizontal lines permit the calibration lens 110 to be used four separate times, that is, as material is successively removed during the edging process, the line 138 is initially consumed, the second edging pass references line 141, the third edging pass utilizes line 144, and finally the only reference line remaining for use is the line 147.
Three pairs of vertical linear markings are formed on calibration lens 110. The outermost pair of vertical linear markings is composed of lines 150 and 151, separated by a distance 152 of approximately 1.969 inch. The lines 150 and 151 extend vertically so as to terminate at the perimeter 154 of the lens 110, where they join the horizontal lines 138 and 139. A second pair of vertical linear markings includes vertical lines 153 and 155, each of which terminates at the horizontal lines 141 and 142. The spacing 156 between lines 153 and 155 is approximately 1.732 inch. A third pair of vertical linear markings consists of vertical lines 157 and 158, which each have a lower end that is spaced a distance 159 of approximately 0.398 inch from the horizontal axis 112.
The upper ends of the lines 157 and 158 reside at a distance 160 from the horizontal axis 112 of approximately 1.043 inch. The parallel vertical lines 157 and 158 are spaced apart from each other by a distance 161 of approximately 1.335 inch. As best seen in
The vertical and horizontal lines just described define rectangles that replicate two types of machine calibration standards commonly used in the spectacle lens industry. The first calibration standard is used in association with equipment manufactured by National Optronics, 100 Avon Street, Charlottesville, Va., while the second standard is a development of Precision Tool Technologies, 924 Wright Street, Brainerd, Minn.
The geometry and dimensions of each lens pocket 198 and 199 are identical. Each lens pocket defines an internal circumference 211 which extends continuously around each pocket 198 and 199. In practice, a stylus, feeler gauge or other sensor travels along the circumference 211 to define the shape and size of a lens which is to be formed by a cutting or edging device associated with the sensor. In this manner the particular geometry of the pocket 198, for example, is transferred to the edging device and is typically accessible to an operator of the edging device via a graphical user interface or other convenient means. The machine operator is then free to generate a drawing or display which indicates the desired configuration of a finished lens which may then be compared to the lens blank 98.
Referring also to
The foregoing features embodied in the present invention are by way of example only. Those skilled in the lens manufacturing field will appreciate that the foregoing features may be modified as appropriate for various specific applications without departing from the scope of the claims. For example, the dimensions and shape of the collet 22 may be varied to accommodate a particular deblocking machine. Further, the position and number of blades 65 and 66 may be adjusted to accommodate a particular edging block 40. Further, the calibration lenses 98 and 110 may have different shapes and dimensions that those depicted, and the surface markings may be varied as required for a particular lens design.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3962833, | Mar 31 1975 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Method for the alteration of a lens and an adhesive lens blocking pad used therein |
5221098, | Nov 05 1991 | HARDINGE INC | Collet closer |
7190030, | Sep 07 2005 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Electrostatic discharge protection structure |
7668617, | Oct 10 2003 | LUNEAU TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS | Method of calibrating an ophthalmic-lens-piercing machine, device used to implement one such method and ophthalmic-lens-machining apparatus comprising one such device |
7970847, | Jan 08 2010 | Malikie Innovations Limited | Method and apparatus for processing data on a computing device |
8182314, | Nov 08 2008 | Automated edged lens deblocking system | |
20100115752, | |||
20110033615, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 11 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 26 2020 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 20 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 20 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 20 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 20 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 20 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 20 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 20 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 20 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 20 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 20 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 20 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 20 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |