A communication control device includes a parameter acquisition unit which acquires a first parameter determined on the basis of the number of mobile stations connected to the first cell or the number of mobile stations connected to the second cell, a parameter determination unit which changes the number of mobile stations connectable to the first cell or the number of mobile stations connectable to the second cell on the basis of the first parameter, and a parameter notification unit which notifies at least any one of the first base station and the second base station of the determined second parameter.
|
1. A communication control device configured to control a first base station forming a first cell having a predetermined cell radius and a second base station forming a second cell having a cell radius smaller than the predetermined cell radius and being overlaid completely within a coverage area of the first cell, the communication control device comprising:
processing circuitry configured to:
acquire a first parameter determined based on a number of mobile stations connected to the first cell or a number of mobile stations connected to the second cell;
determine a second parameter based on the first parameter, the second parameter causing a change in a number of mobile stations connectable to the first cell or a number of mobile stations connectable to the second cell;
notify at least any one of the first base station and the second base station of the second parameter;
acquire a load factor of the first cell and a load factor of the second cell as the first parameter;
determine a cell range expansion value as the second parameter;
set an Almost blank subframe pattern used in an inter-cell interference coordination in a time domain or a Relative Narrowband TX Power pattern used in an inter-cell interference coordination in a frequency domain based on the load factor of the first cell and the load factor of the second cell; and
determine the cell range expansion value by which a difference between the load factor of the first cell and the load factor of the second cell is made within a predetermined range.
2. A communication control method of controlling a first base station forming a first cell having a predetermined cell radius and a second base station forming a second cell having a cell radius smaller than the predetermined cell radius and being overlaid completely within a coverage area of the first cell, the communication control method comprising:
acquiring a first parameter determined based on a number of mobile stations connected to the first cell or a number of mobile stations connected to the second cell;
determining a second parameter based on the acquired first parameter, the second parameter causing a change in a number of mobile stations connectable to the first cell or a number of mobile stations connectable to the second cell; and
notifying at least any one of the first base station and the second base station of the determined second parameter notify at least any one of the first base station and the second base station of the second parameter;
the acquiring further including acquiring a load factor of the first cell and a load factor of the second cell as the first parameter; and
the determining further including
determining a cell range expansion value as the second parameter,
setting an Almost blank subframe pattern used in an inter-cell interference coordination in a time domain or a Relative Narrowband TX Power pattern used in an inter-cell interference coordination in a frequency domain based on the load factor of the first cell and the load factor of the second cell, and
determining the cell range expansion value by which a difference between the load factor of the first cell and the load factor of the second cell is made within a predetermined range.
|
The present invention relates to a communication control device and a communication control method which control base stations, or more specifically, to a communication control device and a communication control method which control parameters concerning inter-cell interference coordination.
The Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) currently under standardization by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project GPP) defines a heterogeneous network (HetNet), which is an overlay network using various types of cells with different transmission power levels, such as picocells, femtocells, remote radio heads (RRHs) besides conventional macrocells (see Non-patent Document 1, for example).
The heterogeneous network prescribes application of cell range expansion in which a cell radius of a picocell or the like is expanded by applying a bias to reception quality (received power) used in cell selection by a mobile station. Thus, when a macrocell is overlaid on a picocell or the like, it is possible to offload more traffic from the macrocell to the picocell.
A mobile station handed over to the picocell as a result of application of the bias receives large interference from the macrocell because the mobile station is situated in an environment usually well connectable to the macrocell. This is why enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) is necessary. Specifically, there is known inter-cell interference coordination to avoid interference by causing a macrocell and a picocell to use different radio resources in a time domain or a frequency domain.
For example, in the inter-cell interference coordination in the time domain, radio resource blocks in the time domain for the macrocell to transmit a radio signal are determined by an almost blank subframe (ABS) pattern which controls the time domain to be allocated to the macrocell.
However, the above-described inter-cell interference coordination has the following problem. In the case of the inter-cell interference coordination in the time domain, for example, the optimum ABS pattern for the number of mobile stations connected to the macrocell and the picocell changes from moment to moment depending on a cell range expansion value (dB). In this case, there is a problem of a failure to determine the optimum ABS pattern.
The present invention has been made in view of the aforementioned circumstances. An objective of the invention is to provide a communication control device and a communication control method which are capable of autonomously optimizing a parameter that changes depending on inter-cell interference coordination in a heterogeneous network.
A first aspect of the present invention provides a communication control device (a communication control device 50) configured to control a first base station (a base station 100) forming a first cell (a macrocell C11) having a predetermined cell radius and a second base station (such as a base station 200A) forming a second cell (such as a picocell C21) having a cell radius smaller than the predetermined cell radius. Here, the device includes: an acquisition unit (a parameter acquisition unit 51) configured to acquire a first parameter determined on the basis of the number of mobile stations connected to the first cell or the number of mobile stations connected to the second cell; a determination unit (a parameter determination unit 53) configured to determine a second parameter on the basis of the first parameter acquired by the acquisition unit, the second parameter causing a change in the number of mobile stations connectable to the first cell or the number of mobile stations connectable to the second cell; and a notification unit (a parameter notification unit 55) configured to notify at least any one of the first base station and the second base station of the second parameter determined by the determination unit.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a communication control method of controlling a first base station forming a first cell having a predetermined cell radius and a second base station forming a second cell having a cell radius smaller than the predetermined cell radius. Here, the method includes the steps of: acquiring a first parameter determined on the basis of the number of mobile stations connected to the first cell or the number of mobile stations connected to the second cell; determining a second parameter on the basis of the acquired first parameter, the second parameter causing a change in the number of mobile stations connectable to the first cell or the number of mobile stations connectable to the second cell; and notifying at least anyone of the first base station and the second base station of the determined second parameter.
Next, an embodiment of the present invention will be described below. Note that, in the following description of the drawings, same or similar reference signs denote same or similar elements and portions. In addition, it should be noted that the drawings are schematic and ratios of dimensions and the like are different from actual ones.
Therefore, specific dimensions and the like should be determined in consideration of the following description. Moreover, the drawings also include portions having different dimensional relationships and ratios from each other.
The communication control device 50 controls the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B. A mobility management entity (MME), for example, can be used as the communication control device 50. Alternatively, the communication control device 50 may be provided inside the base station 100.
The base station 100 is a macro base station which forms a macrocell. The base station 100 constitutes a first base station which forms a macrocell C11 (a first cell) having a predetermined cell radius.
Each base station 200A, 200B is a pico base station which forms a picocell (or a femtocell). The base station 200A constitutes a second base station which forms a picocell C21 (a second cell) having a cell radius smaller than the cell radius of the macrocell C11. Similarly, the base station 200B forms a picocell C22. The base station 200A (200B) may be installed in a building or the like and may form a so-called hot spot.
In this way, the mobile communication system 1 configures a heterogeneous network (HetNet) which is an overlay network using various types of cells with different transmission power levels.
The mobile station 300 is a terminal device which executes radio communication with the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B.
Meanwhile, enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) for avoiding interference between the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B is introduced to the mobile communication system 1. The mobile communication system 1 autonomously optimizes a parameter that changes depending on the inter-cell interference coordination.
The parameter acquisition unit 51 acquires a parameter used for the inter-cell interference coordination. Specifically, the parameter acquisition unit 51 acquires a parameter (a first parameter) determined on the basis of the number of mobile stations connected to the macrocell C11 or the number of mobile stations connected to any of the picocells C21, C22.
In this embodiment, the parameter acquisition unit 51 acquires a load factor of any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22, throughput of any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22, or a usage rate of any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22. Further specific examples of the first parameter will be described later.
The parameter determination unit 53 determines another parameter for controlling any of the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B on the basis of the parameter acquired by the parameter acquisition unit 51. Specifically, the parameter determination unit 53 determines a parameter (a second parameter) to cause a change in any of the number of mobile stations 300 connectable to the macrocell C11 and the number of mobile stations 300 connectable to any of the picocells C21, C22.
In this embodiment, the parameter determination unit 53 determines a radio resource block in a time domain to be allocated to any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22, a radio resource block in a frequency domain to be allocated to any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22, or a value of transmission power of any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22.
Specifically, the parameter determination unit 53 determines any of a size of the radio resource block in the time domain, a size of the radio resource block in the frequency domain, and a value of the transmission power on the basis of any of a load factor ratio among the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22, a throughput ratio among the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22, and a usage rate ratio among the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22. Further specific features of the method of determining the parameter will be described later.
The parameter notification unit 55 notifies at least any one of the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B of the parameter determined by the parameter determination unit 53.
Now, examples of the parameter (the second parameter) used in this embodiment will be described.
As shown in
Meanwhile, as shown in
In this embodiment, the communication control device 50 autonomously controls the ABS pattern used in the inter-cell interference coordination in the time domain and a relative narrowband TX power (RNTP) pattern used in the inter-cell interference coordination in the frequency domain on the basis of the value of the parameter (the first parameter) acquired by the parameter acquisition unit 51.
Next, control expels of the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B by the communication control device 50 will be described.
In this embodiment, the parameter determination unit 53 of the communication control device 50 optimizes the following parameters (the second parameters).
(a) Almost blank subframe (ABS) pattern
(b) Relative narrowband TX power (RNTP) pattern
(c) Cell range expansion value
(d) Transmission power (including transmission power control parameter)
(e) Tilt angle of transmission antenna
In the meantime, the parameter acquisition unit 51 of the communication control device 50 acquires the following parameters (the first parameters) each serving as a trigger for executing optimization of the corresponding second parameter.
(a) Load Factors of Macrocell and Picocell
Here, a load factor is expressed by (the number of mobile stations connected to the cell per second). When the traffic model is a full buffer model, the load factor corresponds to a ratio between the numbers of mobile stations (users) connected to the macrocell or the picocell.
(b) Served Cell Throughput Respectively Transmitted by Macrocell and Picocell
Here, the served cell throughput is defined in 3GPP TR36.814 as follows:
Served cell throughput=total amount of data for all users/total amount of observation time
Considering the traffic model, it is preferable to employ the served cell throughput as the parameter.
(c) ABS (RNTP) Usage Rate of Picocell
Specific control examples of the base station 100 and the base stations 200A, 200B by the communication control device 50 using the above-described first parameters and second parameters will be explained below.
(3.1) ABS (RNTP) Pattern
First, control examples of the ABS (RNTP) pattern will be described with reference to
(3.1.1) Control Example 1
For instance,
In other words, when the cell range expansion value is increased, the communication control device 50 selects such an ABS pattern that increases the percentage of the number of subframes in which the base station 100 (the macro base station) does not perform transmission.
(3.1.2) Control Example 2
Specifically, the communication control device 50 calculates the number of subframes (the number of RB) in which the macrocell does not perform transmission by using the following formula: (the served cell throughput of the macrocell)/(the served cell throughput of the macrocell)+(the served cell throughput of the picocell).
(3.1.3) Control Example 3
As shown in
Specifically, the communication control device 50 calculates the number of subframes (the number of RB) in which the macrocell does not perform transmission by using the following formula: (the load factor of the picocell)/(the load factor of the macrocell)+(the load factor of the picocell) (S32A). Alternatively, the communication control device 50 calculates the number of subframes (the number of RB) in which the macrocell does not perform transmission by using the following formula: (the served cell throughput of the macrocell)/(the served cell throughput of the macrocell)+(the served cell throughput of the picocell) (S32B).
(3.2) Cell Range Expansion Value
Next, control examples of the cell range expansion value will be described with reference to
(3.2.1) Control Example 1
Specifically, as shown in
For example, the communication control device 50 calculates the load factors of the macrocell and the picocell when the cell range expansion value is 4 dB as well as the load factors of the macrocell and the picocell when the cell range expansion value is 12 dB, and sets the cell range expansion value (such as 12 dB) of the picocell by which the load factor of the macrocell becomes equal to the load factor of the picocell.
(3.2.2) Control Example 2
As shown in
(3.2.3) Control Example 3
In Control Example 3, as shown in
Specifically, as shown in
In addition, the communication control device 50 compares the multiple values of the user throughput thus calculated (S240), and selects the cell range expansion value that achieves the highest throughput (S250).
In other words, in Control Example 3, the parameter acquisition unit 51 of the communication control device 50 acquires the numbers of the mobile stations 300 connected to the picocell C21, C22, and the multiple cell range expansion values. The parameter determination unit 53 calculates the throughput of the mobile stations 300 (the user throughput) located at the cell edge of the picocell C21 (C22) in the case of expanding the cell radius of the picocell on the basis of each of the multiple cell range expansion values, and determines the cell range expansion value that achieves the highest throughput among the multiple cell range expansion values on the basis of the throughput thus calculated.
(3.3) Transmission Power Control Parameter
When the number of the mobile stations 300 located in a specific area (such as the picocell C22) is increased, for example, user throughput at a cell edge is calculated under the setting of each of transmission power control parameters corresponding to the number of the mobile stations 300, and the transmission power control parameter value that achieves the highest throughput is selected therefrom.
Specifically, as shown in
In addition, the communication control device 50 compares the multiple values of the user throughput thus calculated (S340), and selects the transmission power control parameter (the transmission power P0) that achieves the highest user throughput (S350).
In other words, in this control example, the parameter acquisition unit 51 of the communication control device 50 acquires the number of the mobile stations 300 connected to the picocell C21 (C22). Based on the number of the mobile stations 300 connected to the picocell C21 (C22), the parameter determination unit 53 calculates candidates of the transmission power P0 of a radio signal from the base station 200A (200B) to the mobile stations 300 located in the cell as well as candidates of the throughput of the mobile stations (the user throughput) on the basis of the transmission power, and determines the candidate of the transmission power that achieves the highest throughput.
(3.4) Picocell Transmission Power
As shown in
Meanwhile, as shown in
According to this control example, when the number of the mobile stations 300 connected to the picocell C22, for example, is 0 as shown in
Alternatively, when the number of the mobile stations 300 connected to the picocell C22 is reduced, the communication control device 50 may increase a tilt angle of a transmission antenna of the base station 100 (the macro base station).
The above-described mobile communication system 1 determines the parameters on the basis of the number of the mobile stations 300 connected to the macrocell C11 or the number of the mobile stations 300 connected to the picocell C21, C22, or more specifically, determines the ABS pattern, the RNTP pattern, the cell range expansion value, the transmission power value, and the tilt angle of the transmission antenna. For this reason, the mobile communication system 1 can determine the optimum control parameter for the number of the mobile stations connected to any of the macrocell C11 and the picocells C21, C22. In other words, the mobile communication system 1 can autonomously optimize the parameter that changes depending on the inter-cell interference coordination in the heterogeneous network using the various types of cells with different transmission power levels.
As described above, the details of the present invention have been disclosed by using an embodiment of the present invention. However, it should not be understood that the description and drawings which constitute part of this disclosure limit the present invention. From this disclosure, various alternative embodiments, examples, and operation techniques will be easily found by those skilled in the art.
For example, in the above-described embodiment, the communication control device 50 has been explained as the one configured to perform the processing in accordance with the flows shown in
Meanwhile, the embodiment has been described above by using the mobile communication system in compliance with the LTE-A as the example. However, the present invention is naturally applicable not only to the LTE-A but also to other mobile communication systems configured to execute inter-cell interference coordination in a heterogeneous network using various types of cells with different transmission power levels.
Furthermore, in the above-described embodiment, the communication control device 50 is provided in a core network. Instead, it is possible to provide the communication control device 50 inside the base station 100, and to cause the communication control device 50 to acquire the information from the base stations 200A, 200B and control the base stations 200A and 200B.
As described above, the present invention naturally includes various embodiments which are not described herein. Accordingly, the technical scope of the present invention should be determined only by the matters to define the invention in the scope of claims regarded as appropriate based on the description.
Note that the entire content of Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-119734 (filed on May 27, 2011) is incorporated herein by reference.
According to the features of the present invention, it is possible to provide a communication control device and a communication control method which are capable of autonomously optimizing a parameter that changes depending on inter-cell interference coordination in a heterogeneous network.
Takahashi, Hideaki, Abe, Tetsushi, Nakamura, Takehiro, Nagata, Satoshi, Iwamura, Mikio
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10547550, | Jul 02 2014 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for inter-cell load balance in wireless communication system |
11463363, | Jul 02 2014 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for inter-cell load balance in wireless communication system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8805398, | Dec 08 2009 | NEC Corporation | Radio communication system, base station apparatus, base station control apparatus, method of controlling transmission power of base station, and computer readable medium |
9332474, | May 17 2012 | TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON PUBL | Signaling support for multi sector deployment in cellular communications |
20040117432, | |||
20050025079, | |||
20050124369, | |||
20050130644, | |||
20070140160, | |||
20090061799, | |||
20100069063, | |||
20110211560, | |||
20110244863, | |||
20110306347, | |||
20120026972, | |||
20120113844, | |||
20120115527, | |||
20120122472, | |||
20120188884, | |||
20130017793, | |||
20130028199, | |||
20130079049, | |||
20140307648, | |||
20150237634, | |||
EP856955, | |||
JP2007507152, | |||
JP2010283440, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 21 2012 | NTT DOCOMO, INC. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jul 31 2013 | NAGATA, SATOSHI | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031503 | /0543 | |
Jul 31 2013 | ABE, TETSUSHI | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031503 | /0543 | |
Jul 31 2013 | TAKAHASHI, HIDEAKI | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031503 | /0543 | |
Jul 31 2013 | IWAMURA, MIKIO | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031503 | /0543 | |
Jul 31 2013 | NAKAMURA, TAKEHIRO | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031503 | /0543 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 08 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 23 2020 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 18 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 18 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 18 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 18 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 18 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 18 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 18 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 18 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 18 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 18 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 18 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 18 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |