A technology for an enhanced node b (eNode b) in a cellular network that is operable to determine downtilt using full dimensional (FD) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO). A plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) signals can be transmitted, wherein each transmitted OFDMA signal is transmitted with a selected downtilt angle from a two dimensional antenna array of the eNode b. reference signal received power (RSRP) feedback information can be received from a UE for each of transmitted OFDMA signals at the selected downtilt angles. Received signal strength indicator (RSSI) feedback information can be received from the UE. A reference signal received quality (RSRQ) can be calculated for each of the selected antennas angles using the RSRP feedback information and the RSSI feedback information. A downtilt angle can be selected for transmitting data from the eNode b with a highest signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR).
|
1. A user equipment (UE) operable to communicate reference signal information for selected downtilt angles in a cellular network, having computer circuitry configured to:
receive, at the UE, a plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) signals, wherein each received OFDMA signal is transmitted with a selected downtilt angle from a two dimensional antenna array of the enhanced node b (eNode b);
communicate, to the eNode b, reference signal received power (RSRP) feedback information for each of the received OFDMA signals at the selected downtilt angles;
communicate, to the eNode b, received signal strength indicator (RSSI) feedback information to enable the UE to receive the OFDMA signals from the two dimensional antenna array at a downtilt angle with an increased signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR);
determine interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode b in the cellular network by using a primary synchronization signal (PSS) or a secondary synchronization signal (SSS) with a time domain muting pattern for RSRP and interference measurement;
include interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode b in the cellular network by calculating the RSSI by summing an averaged received power measured from a non-zero power (NZP) channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) and an interference measurement resource (IMR); and
using a plurality of sub-IMRs for averaging interference and for testing one or more inter-cell interference, wherein the each of the plurality of sub-IMRs is a portion of the IMR and includes a subframe, a physical resource block (PRB) index, and a resource element (RE) index.
14. A method to determine downtilt using full dimensional (FD) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) of an evolved node b (eNode b) in a cellular network, comprising:
transmitting an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) signal at selected downtilt angles from a two dimensional antenna array of the eNode b;
receiving, from a user equipment (UE), reference signal received power (RSRP) feedback information for each of the selected downtilt angles;
receiving, from the UE, received signal strength indicator (RSSI) feedback information;
calculating a reference signal received quality (RSRQ) for each of the selected antennas angles using the RSRP feedback information and the RSSI feedback information;
calculate an inferred inter-node interference value based on the selected downtilt angles;
selecting a downtilt angle for transmitting data from the eNode b with a highest RSRQ value;
determine interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode b in the cellular network by using a primary synchronization signal (PSS) or a secondary synchronization signal (SSS) with a time domain muting pattern for RSRP and interference measurement;
calculate an RSRQ for a selected downtilt using an RSRP that corresponds to the sub CSI-RS, wherein the UE includes interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode b in the cellular network by calculating the RS SI by summing an averaged received power measured from the NZP CSI-RS and an interference measurement resource (IMR) and uses the plurality of sub-INRs for averaging interference and for testing one or more inter-cell interference, wherein the each of the plurality of sub-INRs is a portion of the IMR and includes a subframe, physical resource block (PRB) index, and a resource element (RE) index.
9. An enhanced node b (eNode b) operable to determine downtilt using full dimensional (FD) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) in a cellular network, having computer circuitry configured to:
transmit a plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) signals, wherein each transmitted OFDMA signal is transmitted with a selected downtilt angle from a two dimensional antenna array of the eNode b;
receive, from a user equipment (UE), reference signal received power (RSRP) feedback information for each of transmitted OFDMA signals at the selected downtilt angles;
receive, from the UE, received signal strength indicator (RSSI) feedback information;
calculate a reference signal received quality (RSRQ) for each of the selected antennas angles using the RSRP feedback information and the RSSI feedback information;
calculate an inferred inter-node interference value based on the selected downtilt angles; and
select a downtilt angle for transmitting data from the eNode b with a highest signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR);
determine a channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) based RSRQ using a non-zero power CSI-RS and a channel state information interference measurement (CSI-IM);
calculate an RSRQ for a selected downtilt using an RSRP that corresponds to the sub CSI-RS, wherein the UE includes interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode b in the cellular network by calculating the RS SI by summing an averaged received power measured from the NZP CSI-RS and an interference measurement resource (IMR) and uses the plurality of sub-IMRs for averaging interference and for testing one or more inter-cell interference, wherein the each of the plurality of sub-IMRs is a portion of the IMR and includes a subframe, physical resource block (PRB) index, and a resource element (RE) index.
2. The computer circuitry of
3. The computer circuitry of
4. The computer circuitry of
5. The computer circuitry of
6. The computer circuitry of
filter the RSRP based on each sub CSI-RS; and
communicate the filtered RSRP to the eNode b.
7. The computer circuitry of
8. The computer circuitry of
10. The computer circuitry of
11. The computer circuitry of
12. The computer circuitry of
13. The computer circuitry of
15. The method of
receiving an RSRQ from the UE; and
determining a downtilt with the highest signal to noise ratio (SNR) or signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) based on the RSRP and the received RSRQ.
16. The method of
|
This application claims the benefit of and hereby incorporates by reference U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/859,121, filed Jul. 26, 2013.
Multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) technology is the use of multiple antennas at both one or more transmitters and one or more receivers. A MIMO system can be used to increase data throughput and link reliability of a network without increasing bandwidth frequencies or increasing transmit power of the network. To achieve the increased data throughput and link reliability, the data communicated between a node and a mobile device can be spread over the multiple antennas to achieve an array gain that improves the spectral efficiency and achieve a diversity gain that increases the link reliability. Massive MIMOs can deploy a large number of elements in antenna arrays. Multiple terminals can be deployed for combining a massive MIMO technology with conventional time and frequency division multiplexing using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM).
Three-dimensional (3D) or full-dimensional (FD) MIMO systems can be used in MIMO networks to enhance the cellular performance by deploying antenna elements in both horizontal and vertical dimensions, e.g. a two dimensional (2D) antenna array. A FD MIMO system can direct communications in two dimensions, i.e. horizontally and vertically, to a location in three dimensional (3D) space. The direction of communications in 3D space can increase the directionality, allowing for increased numbers of communication paths, more focused beamforming, and increased throughput for spatial multiplexing in comparison with traditional two dimensional MIMO systems.
Features and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the disclosure; and, wherein:
Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.
Before the present invention is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular examples only and is not intended to be limiting. The same reference numerals in different drawings represent the same element. Numbers provided in flow charts and processes are provided for clarity in illustrating steps and operations and do not necessarily indicate a particular order or sequence.
In a communications network, throughput can be affected by both the signal strength and interference strength. The throughput of a network can be increased by balancing a ratio between a signal strength and an interference level of nodes in a network. One technique for balancing signal strength and interference strength for nodes in a network can be to use beamforming. Beamforming can be used for an antenna array to direct or control signal transmission directions. In conventional two dimensional (2D) multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) systems, beamforming can be performed in a horizontal domain. A 2D MIMO system in a communication system can include a plurality of cell sites, each having a node such as an evolved Node B (eNode B) or base station, for sending and receiving signals over one or more antennas or antenna modules. In one embodiment, each antenna module can have one or more receiving antennas and one or more transmit antennas. In another embodiment, each antenna module can have one antenna to transmit and receive data.
The antenna array 102a can be mounted on a transmission point 106a, such as an enhanced Node B (eNode B), with a corresponding coverage area 108a. The horizontal directivity provided by the array is depicted by the beam direction geometries, 110a, 112a, and 114a. A beam direction geometry, also referred to as a radiation pattern, can depict a region with respect to the transmission point where a corresponding signal is highest, but the corresponding signal may be present in other regions as well. The curved arrow indicates that the three different beam direction geometries, or side lobes, that belong to a continuum of different possibilities.
In the 3D MIMO system, a radiation pattern of a transmitting antenna at a node can be tilted along a vertical axis. The degree of the vertical tilting or the tilting angle can be measured relative to a horizontal plain of reference. The tilting angle can be referred to as the downtilt angle of the antenna. The downtilt angle of the antenna can be measured to be positive from the horizontal reference plain of the antenna towards the ground. For example, an antenna with a downtilt angle of 10 degrees tilts towards the ground at a 10 degree angle relative to the horizontal reference.
The antenna elements 104b in the antenna array 102b can have their phases and amplitudes configured to enable the antenna array 102b to transmit to a desired coverage area, which is a geographic area in which a mobile terminal can receive a signal with a sufficient strength to communicate with a node associated with the antenna array. A coverage area range and/or scope of an antenna array can be affected by the electronic downtilt angle of each antenna and/or downtilt angles of surrounding and/or adjacent antennas in the antenna array 102b.
For a traditional 2D MIMO system, the downtilt of the antenna elements in an antenna array of an eNode B can be held constant and a user equipment (UE) can measure a reference signal received power (RSRP) and/or a reference signal received quality (RSRQ) for each node associated with a cell in order to assist the eNode B to make a cell association decision. In one embodiment, the RSRP can be used for intra-frequency cell association and the RSRQ can be used for inter-frequency cell association.
RSRP can be defined as a linear average of the power contributions (in Watts) of resource elements that carry cell-specific reference signals within a selected measurement frequency bandwidth. A reference point for the RSRP can be the antenna connector of the UE. In one embodiment, when a receiver diversity is used by the UE, the RSRP may not be lower than the corresponding RSRP of any of the individual diversity branches.
For a 3D/FD MIMO system, beamforming can be performed in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. In 3D/FD MIMO systems, elevation or vertical beamforming can be used to either increase the signal strength of a cell and/or decrease signal interference to neighboring cells. In one embodiment, elevation beamforming in 3D/FD MIMO systems can be used to optimize cell association selection by the eNode B. For example, elevation beamforming can be used to optimize an azimuth and downtilting of each cell in the 3D/FD MIMO system for different traffic distributions. In one embodiment, maximizing a signal strength or minimizing a signal interference separately or independent of each other may not optimize or increase a signal to interference ratio (SIR), signal to noise ratio (SNR), or signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) of a network. In one embodiment, interference minimization and signal strength maximization can be performed together to maximize the SIR, SNR, and/or SINR of a network, e.g. maximize throughput.
Traditionally in 3D/FD MIMO systems, a UE computes an RSRP in a moving average fashion and assumes that the 3D/FD MIMO system does not change any downtilt angles of a cell. Computing an RSRP using a moving average can mix distinct responses for eNode Bs with different downtilts and can prevent eNode Bs from identifying different downtilts of cells that are favorable to the overall network.
In one embodiment, a UE can compute the RSRP feedback for a selected downtilt of a cell. In another embodiment, the UE can compute the RSRP feedback for the selected downtilt of the cell without averaging the RSRP across the resource elements of other cell downtilts.
Traditionally, a mobility measurement is based on either an RSRP or an RSRQ. The RSRP can consider a common reference signal (CRS) receiving power of one cell, e.g. not reflecting the load conditions of both the cell and neighboring or adjacent cells. The RSRQ can be derived from a RSRP and the total receiving power of a cell. For example, RSRQ can be defined as a ratio N×RSRP/(evolved universal terrestrial radio access carrier received signal strength indication), where N is the number of resource blocks (RBs) of the evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA) carrier received signal strength indication (RSSI) measurement bandwidth. In one embodiment, the NxRSRP and the E-UTRA carrier RSSI measurements can be made over a same set of resource blocks.
In one embodiment, an E-UTRA Carrier RSSI can comprise a linear average of a total received power (in Watts) observed for orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols containing reference symbols for an antenna port, such as antenna port 0, in a measurement bandwidth, over N number of resource blocks by the UE from all sources. The sources of the network can include co-channel serving cells, non-serving cells, adjacent channel interference, thermal noise, and so forth.
When higher-layer signaling indicates selected subframes for performing RSRQ measurements, then RSSI can measured over all OFDM symbols in the indicated subframes. In one embodiment, a reference point for the RSRQ can be an antenna connector of the UE. In another embodiment, when receiver diversity is in use by the UE, a reported value may not be lower than the corresponding RSRQ of any of the individual diversity branches.
In one embodiment, the eNode Bs can select the optimum downtilts by measuring different downtilts using reference signals at different downtilt angles to the UEs. Each UE can then conduct RSRQ measurements on the reference signals and communicate the RSRQ measurement information to the eNode B. This enables the eNode B to determine an optimal downtilt angle without the need to send data at different downtilts. The communication of reference signals or data at different angles is referred to as testing downtilts.
In one embodiment, radio resource management (RRM) measurements can be derived from the RSRQ of a serving cell and used to infer inter-cell interference for testing downtilts of neighboring cells. When the network obtains enough measurement reports for different testing downtilts, the network can determine the downtilts of each cell to optimize the SNR or SINR for the network.
In one embodiment, a channel-state—information interference-measurement resource (CSI-IM) can be used for CSI reporting. For example, for transmission mode 10, one CSI reporting instance can be associated with one non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource and one CSI-IM to measure interference, respectively. The NZP CSI-RS can be used to measure channel response and the CSI-IM can be used to measure interference.
In one embodiment, CSI-RS and CSI-IM can be used for downtilt control. For example,
In one embodiment, a new E-UTRA RSSI that is the denominator of the RSRQ can be different from the existing RSSI. In one embodiment, the new RSSI can be the sum of the RSRP and the averaged received power measured from the IMR REs. The new RSSI can contain information about the testing downtilts and contain no information about incumbent downtilts carrying the non-genuine data of the neighboring cells. In another embodiment, the new RSSI can be the sum of the average received power measured from NZP CSI-RS and IMR.
In the IMR REs, the network can try different downtilts on the neighbor cells at different subframes or resource blocks. Traditionally, interference generated by different downtilts in neighboring cells is averaged by the UE and the eNode B cannot distinguish the effects of different downtilts from the RSRQ received from the UE. In one embodiment, to prevent averaging across different downtilts, restrictions and signaling can be used to assist the UE to determine an averaging region for each downtilt.
In one embodiment, the restrictions can be over subframes, physical resource blocks or REs in an IMR resource. For example, when the interference average length in time is 2 subframes, the UE can assume the interference to be constant in subframe 2n and 2n+1. In this example, the UE can use an averaged E-UTRA RSSI of subframes 2n and 2n+1 to derive the CSI-RS RSRQ in subframe 2n+1. In another example, when an interference average length in frequency is at every 2nd physical resource block (PRB), a UE can assume the interference to be constant in PRB 2n, 2n+2, 2n+4. In this example, where the UE cannot assume the interference in the even PRBs is equal to the interference in the odd PRBs, the UE can derive two different RSRQ values for the odd and even PRBs in the same subframe, respectively.
In another example, four REs of an IMR can be used for the testing of different selected downtilts. In this example, a sub-IMR can specify how interference can be averaged. In one embodiment, the sub-IMR can be a function of a subframe, a PRB index, and an RE index in one IMR. The sub-IMR can be used for unique inter-cell interference testing.
In one embodiment, the RSRP and RSRQ measurements can be for each cell of the communications network to allow the measuring of an RSRQ for each IMR or sub-IMR. The current MeasObjectEUTRA information element can be updated as below:
CellsToAddMod ::= Sequence {
cellIndex
INTEGER (1..maxCellMeas),
physCellId
PhysCellId
cellIndividualOffset
Q-OffsetRange,
imrIdxRsrq
ImrIdxRsrq
}
or
CellsToAddMod ::= Sequence {
cellIndex
INTEGER (1..maxCellMeas),
physCellId
PhysCellId
cellIndividualOffset
Q-OffsetRange,
subimrIdxRsrq
subImrIdxRsrq
}
In one example, when a UE is in a radio resource control (RRC) connected mode, the muting pattern can be transmitted to the UE using RRC signaling. For the RRC connected mode, the MeasObjectEUTRA information element can be updated as:
CellsToAddMod ::= Sequence {
cellIndex
INTEGER (1..maxCellMeas),
physCellId
PhysCellId
cellIndividualOffset
Q-OffsetRange,
PSS/SSS Muting pattern
Bit map of PSS/SSS muting pattern
}
In another embodiment, when the UE is in an RRC idle mode, the muting pattern and time domain restriction can be determined using a physical cell identity (PCI).
In another embodiment, the RSRQ can be derived using interference emulation with multiple CSI-RS resources.
In one embodiment, each CSI-RS resource 810-830 can be split into multiple sub CSI-RS resources, similar to the sub-IMRs discussed in the preceding paragraphs. The sub CSI-RSs can be a function of a subframe, a PRB index, and an RE index in one CSI-RS. In one embodiment, the UE can filter and report the RSRP for each sub CSI-RS to the network. In one example, where the network selected a downtilt and is aware of the downtilts used for each sub CSI-RS resource, the network can calculate the RSRQ for a selected downtilt hypothesis using the reported RSRP of the corresponding sub CSI-RSs. In another embodiment, the network can determine hand over decisions based on a calculated RSRQ.
In one embodiment, the eNode B can use a selected downtilt for the actual reference signals and data channels. The UE can generate an RSRP feedback and an RSRQ feedback for the network to determine the optimum or maximum combination of downtilts for the current network. In one embodiment, the allocations of different downtilts can be communicated to the UE for feedback computation to enable the eNode B to distinguish the effects of different downtilts on the network.
Another example provides functionality 900 of computer circuitry of a UE in a cellular network that is operable to communicate reference signal information for selected downtilt angles, as shown in the flow chart in
In one embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to calculate the RSSI by summing the RSRP and an averaged received power measured from an IMR RE. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to include interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode B in the cellular network by calculating the RSSI by summing an averaged received power measured from a NZP CSI-RS and an IMR. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to determine an averaging region for a downtilt of the one or more adjacent nodes. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to calculate the RSSI for one of the selected downtilt angles at each of a plurality of sub-IMRs. In another embodiment, the each of the sub-IMRs is a portion of the IMR and includes a subframe, physical resource block (PRB) index, and a resource element (RE) index. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to receive a sub CSI-RS for each of the selected downtilt angles, wherein the sub CSI-RS is a portion of the CSI-RS and includes a subframe, physical resource block (PRB) index, and a resource element (RE) index. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to filter the RSRP based on each sub CSI-RS and communicate the filtered RSRP to the eNode B. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to determine interference from one or more nodes adjacent to the eNode B in the cellular network by using a PSS or a SSS with a time domain muting pattern for RSRP and interference measurement. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to receive the PSS or SSS via radio resource control (RRC) signaling. In another embodiment, each node of the network has a different time domain muting pattern.
Another example provides functionality 1000 of computer circuitry of an eNode B in a cellular network that is operable to determine downtilt using full dimensional (FD) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), as shown in the flow chart in
In one embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to calculate an inferred inter-node interference value for one or more adjacent nodes in the cellular network based on the selected antennas angles. In another embodiment, the inter-cell interference is generated by the cell-specific reference signals (CRS) or physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) of the one or more adjacent nodes. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to communicate to the UE a time domain muting pattern for RSRP measurement and interference measurement using RRC signaling. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to determine a channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) based RSRQ using a non-zero power CSI-RS and a channel state information interference measurement (CSI-IM). In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to receive RSRP for each of a plurality of sub CSI-RSs. In another embodiment, the computer circuitry can be further configured to calculate an RSRQ for a selected downtilt using an RSRP that corresponds to the sub CSI-RS.
In one embodiment, the method can further comprise receiving an RSRQ from the UE and determining a downtilt with the highest signal to noise ratio (SNR) or signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) based on the RSRP and the received RSRQ. In one embodiment, the method can further comprise communicating to the UE a downtilt value for a CSI-RS for each of the selected downtilt angles for the UE to use to identify a downtilt angle with a highest signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR).
Various techniques, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, non-transitory computer readable storage medium, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the various techniques. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device may include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. The volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements may be a RAM, EPROM, flash drive, optical drive, magnetic hard drive, or other medium for storing electronic data. The base station and mobile station may also include a transceiver module, a counter module, a processing module, and/or a clock module or timer module. One or more programs that may implement or utilize the various techniques described herein may use an application programming interface (API), reusable controls, and the like. Such programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) may be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.
It should be understood that many of the functional units described in this specification have been labeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize their implementation independence. For example, a module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like.
Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions, which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose for the module.
Indeed, a module of executable code may be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network. The modules may be passive or active, including agents operable to perform desired functions.
Reference throughout this specification to “an example” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the example is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in an example” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary. In addition, various embodiments and example of the present invention may be referred to herein along with alternatives for the various components thereof. It is understood that such embodiments, examples, and alternatives are not to be construed as defacto equivalents of one another, but are to be considered as separate and autonomous representations of the present invention.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of layouts, distances, network examples, etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, layouts, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
While the forgoing examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the claims set forth below.
Zhu, Yuan, Li, Qinghua, Chen, Xiaogang, Xue, Feng, Shirani-Mehr, Hooman
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11196476, | Jun 02 2017 | Intel Corporation | Beamformed measurement for new radio (NR) |
11646781, | Jun 02 2017 | Apple Inc. | Beamformed measurement for new radio (NR) |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6487416, | Jul 30 1999 | Qwest Communications International Inc | Method and system for controlling antenna downtilt in a CDMA network |
20060258295, | |||
20110103504, | |||
20110300871, | |||
20120195286, | |||
20120257515, | |||
20130301450, | |||
20140211731, | |||
20140241198, | |||
20160021621, | |||
20160080061, | |||
EP2555445, | |||
EP2747304, | |||
WO2012157870, | |||
WO2013024852, | |||
WO2013025558, | |||
WO2013064897, | |||
WO2014182383, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 31 2014 | INTEL IP CORPORATION | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 03 2014 | LI, QINGHUA | INTEL IP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032742 | /0767 | |
Apr 03 2014 | XUE, FENG | INTEL IP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032742 | /0767 | |
Apr 07 2014 | SHIRANI-MEHR, HOOMAN | INTEL IP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032742 | /0767 | |
Apr 14 2014 | ZHU, YUAN | INTEL IP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032742 | /0767 | |
Apr 14 2014 | CHEN, XIAOGANG | INTEL IP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032742 | /0767 | |
Nov 30 2019 | Intel Corporation | Apple Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 053062 | /0703 | |
May 29 2020 | INTEL IP CORPORATION | Intel Corporation | CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT | 053066 | /0388 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 13 2020 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 14 2024 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 28 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 28 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 28 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 28 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 28 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 28 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 28 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 28 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 28 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 28 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 28 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 28 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |