An antenna system (100) comprising a single antenna element having first (111) and second (112) antenna ports arranged to pass a respective first and second antenna signal. The first and second antenna signals being derived from a first common antenna signal (J1) and arranged to be essentially equal in envelope. An antenna pattern of the system being arranged to be selectable between a first antenna pattern having a first polarization and a second antenna pattern having a second polarization substantially orthogonal to the first polarization. The first antenna pattern being selected by setting the first and second antenna signal to have the same polarity on first (111) and second (112) antenna ports, the second antenna pattern being selected by setting the first and second antenna signal to have substantially opposite polarities on first (111) and second (112) antenna ports.
|
1. An antenna system (100) comprising an antenna structure (110) consisting of a single antenna element having first (111) and second (112) antenna ports arranged to pass a respective first and second antenna signal, the first and second antenna signals arranged to be derived from a first common antenna signal (J1) and arranged to be essentially equal in envelope, the antenna structure (110) being arranged to have an antenna pattern which is selectable between a first antenna pattern having a first polarization and a second antenna pattern having a second polarization substantially orthogonal to the first polarization, the first antenna pattern being selected by setting the first and second antenna signal to have the same polarity on first (111) and second (112) antenna ports, the second antenna pattern being selected by setting the first and second antenna signal to have substantially opposite polarities on first (111) and second (112) antenna ports.
19. A method for selecting an antenna pattern of an antenna system (100), the antenna system (100) comprising an antenna structure (110) consisting of a single antenna element having first (111) and second (112) antenna ports arranged to pass a respective first and second antenna signal, the antenna pattern of the antenna structure (110) arranged to be selectable between a first antenna pattern having a first polarization and a second antenna pattern having a second polarization substantially orthogonal to the first polarization, the method comprising the steps of:
receiving (S0) a first common signal,
deriving (S1) the first and second antenna signals from the first common signal,
setting (S2) the first and second antenna signal to have the same polarity on first (111) and second (112) antenna ports in case the first antenna pattern is selected, and
setting (S3) the first and second antenna signal to have substantially opposite polarities on first (111) and second (112) antenna ports in case the second antenna pattern is selected.
2. The antenna system (100) according to
3. The antenna system (200) according to
4. The antenna system (250) according to
5. The antenna system (250) according to
6. The antenna system (250) according to
7. The antenna system (250) according to
8. The antenna system (300) according to
9. The antenna system (400) according to
10. The antenna system (100, 200, 300) according to
11. The antenna system (100, 200, 300) according to
12. The antenna system (100, 200, 400) according to
13. The antenna system (100, 200, 300, 400) according to
14. The antenna system according to
15. The antenna system (100, 200, 300, 400) according to
16. The antenna system (100, 200, 300, 400) according to
17. An airborne vehicle (710, 810) configured to carry the antenna system (100, 200, 300, 400) according to
18. An airborne vehicle (710, 810) configured to carry a first and a second antenna system (100, 200, 300, 400) according to
|
This application is a National Stage Application, filed under 35 U.S.C. 371, of International Application No. PCT/SE2014/050304, filed Mar. 12, 2014; the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Related Field
The present disclosure relates to an antenna system for transmission and reception of polarized signals, and in particular to transmission and reception of polarized radar signals.
Description of Related Art
Low frequency radar systems, i.e., involving wavelengths on the order of meters, and airborne low frequency radar systems in particular, can be used for finding targets buried under ground or hidden below camouflage or trees. Low frequency radar systems can also be applied in establishing environmental parameters such as biomass.
The physics governing how low frequency radar signals interact with the ground depend to a high degree on the polarization state of the signal. Therefore, collecting data for both vertical and horizontal polarization is often valuable and sometimes even necessary.
Due to the comparably low frequencies involved, and the dependency on polarization state of the radar signal, the design of radar antennas in the area of airborne meter wavelength radar contains several significant challenges.
For instance, antennas must be physically quite large—the smallest high efficiency antenna is half a wavelength dipole, meaning that such dipoles will be of meter size. A dipole is not directive in contrast to conventional radar antennas, which extends for many wavelengths not only in one dimension, as a dipole, but in two dimensions. Just scaling such antennas is clearly not feasible for low frequency radar. Also, dipoles are often required to be wideband in the sense that the radar often needs to function and keep a reasonably constant antenna diagram or antenna pattern across a bandwidth of at least octave order.
Also, the polarization state of transmitted and received radar signals must often be controllable or selectable. In some applications, the polarization state also needs to be alternated with kHz order switching frequency, or used in parallel for horizontal and vertical polarization, so that radar response for both polarizations can be collected.
Hence, there is a need for an antenna system for use with low frequency radar systems which is comparably compact in terms of size, and where the polarization state of the transmitted and received radar signals can be controlled.
An object of the present disclosure is to provide antenna systems, vehicles, and methods, which seek to mitigate, alleviate, or eliminate one or more of the above-identified deficiencies in the art and disadvantages singly or in any combination.
This object is obtained by an antenna system comprising an antenna structure consisting of a single antenna element having first and second antenna ports arranged to pass a respective first and second antenna signal. The first and second antenna signals arranged to be derived from a first common antenna signal and also arranged to be essentially equal in envelope. The antenna structure is arranged to have an antenna pattern which is selectable between a first antenna pattern having a first polarization and a second antenna pattern having a second polarization substantially orthogonal to the first polarization. The first antenna pattern is selected by setting the first and second antenna signal to have the same polarity on first and second antenna ports. The second antenna pattern is selected by setting the first and second antenna signal to have substantially opposite polarities on first and second antenna ports.
Thus, there is provided an antenna system particularly suitable for use with low frequency radar systems in that the antenna system is compact in terms of size due to the single antenna element, which is an advantage.
The provided antenna system brings an additional advantage in that the polarization state of transmitted and received signals can be controlled or selected in a straightforward way by setting the polarities of the first and second antenna signal.
According to one aspect, the antenna system further comprises a first antenna interface unit comprising a 180 degree hybrid coupler, a switching unit, and a first common port for passing the first common antenna signal. The 180 degree hybrid coupler has first and second coupler ports connected to the first and to the second antenna port, respectively, as well as a summation and a difference port connected to the switching unit. The switching unit is arranged to connect the first common port of the antenna interface unit to either of the summation port or the difference port of the 180 degree hybrid coupler, thus selecting between the first and the second antenna pattern of the antenna system.
Thus, by the feature of the antenna interface unit, connecting a radar transceiver to the antenna system is facilitated, which is an advantage. Further, switching between polarization states, i.e., selecting the polarization of transmitted and received signals, is simplified due to the feature of the switching unit, which is also an advantage.
According to another aspect, the first and second antenna ports are also arranged to pass a third and a fourth antenna signal, respectively. The third and fourth antenna signals have substantially identical envelopes and are derived from a second common antenna signal which is substantially orthogonal to the first common antenna signal. The antenna system, according to said aspect, comprises a second antenna interface unit. The second antenna interface unit comprises a second and a third common port for passing the first and the second common antenna signal, respectively, as well as a 180 degree hybrid coupler. The 180 degree hybrid coupler has first and second coupler ports connected to the first and to the second antenna port, respectively, as well as a summation and a difference port connected to the second and third common ports, respectively, thus selecting the first polarization for one of the first and the second common signal, and selecting the second polarization for the other of the first and second common signal.
Thus, advantageously, the antenna system can be used simultaneously in both polarization states. The first common antenna signal mainly resides in one polarization, the second common antenna signal mainly resides in the other polarization.
According to a further aspect, the antenna structure comprises an elongated conductive bridge having a length between first and second ends smaller than half of the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the first common antenna signal. The antenna structure further comprises two elongated conductive legs arranged in parallel and having respective lengths between first and second ends smaller than half of the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the first common antenna signal. Said legs are attached at first leg ends to either end of the elongated conductive bridge in right angles with respect to the conductive bridge, thus substantially forming a U-shape. The sum of lengths of the elongated conductive bridge and the two elongated conductive legs is substantially equal to half of the wavelength corresponding to the center frequency of the first common antenna signal. The first antenna port is connected to the second end of one leg, the second antenna port is connected to the second end of the other leg. The antenna structure is arranged to have a ground plane orthogonal to both legs and located approximately at the second ends of the legs. The antenna structure has a total length, including elongated conductive bridge and both legs, less than the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the first common antenna signal.
According to an aspect, the elongated conductive bridge is extended by first and second conductive extension units connected at either end of the elongated conductive bridge, thus substantially forming a Π-shape, the total length of the elongated conductive bridge with extension units being smaller than the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the common antenna signal.
Thus, advantageously, by any of the U-shape or Π-shaped antenna structures disclosed herein, there is provided a wideband antenna of comparably small size which facilitates attaining compliancy with, e.g., aeromechanical requirements and where the polarization state of the transmitted and received signals can be controlled and also alternated or even used in parallel for horizontal and vertical polarization so that, e.g., radar response for both polarizations can be collected. This will be further discussed in the detailed description below.
The feature of the extension units being smaller than the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the common antenna signal advantageously contributes to preventing excitation of the bridge due to the length of the bridge being on the order of a wavelength of the first common signal in size.
According to one aspect, the antenna system is adapted to be mounted on an airborne vehicle.
According to another aspect, the antenna system is adapted to be mounted on a surface based vehicle.
The object is also obtained by an airborne vehicle arranged to carry the antenna system of the present disclosure.
The object is further obtained by a method for selecting an antenna pattern of an antenna system. The antenna system comprising an antenna structure consisting of a single antenna element having first and second antenna ports arranged to pass a respective first and second antenna signal. The antenna pattern of the antenna structure is arranged to be selectable between a first antenna pattern having a first polarization and a second antenna pattern having a second polarization substantially orthogonal to the first polarization. The method comprising the steps of receiving a first common signal, and deriving the first and second antenna signals from the first common signal, as well as setting the first and second antenna signal to have the same polarity on first and second antenna ports in case the first antenna pattern is selected or setting the first and second antenna signal to have substantially opposite polarities on first and second antenna ports in case the second antenna pattern is selected.
The vehicles and the method all display advantages corresponding to the advantages already described in relation to the disclosed antenna system.
Further objects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will appear from the following detailed description, wherein some aspects of the disclosure will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aspects of the present disclosure will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. The apparatus, vehicles, and method disclosed herein can, however, be realized in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the aspects set forth herein. Like numbers in the drawings refer to like elements throughout.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular aspects of the disclosure only, and is not intended to limit the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
In the following, we will mainly discuss antenna behavior during transmission—reception behavior is assumed substantially the same by reciprocity.
Herein, ‘essentially equal in envelope’ means that the first antenna signal is essentially equal to the second antenna signal except for a possible difference in phase between the two signals. In other words, assuming that the first antenna signal is given by s1(t) and the second antenna signal is given by s2(t), then |s1(t)≅|s2(t)|. If the first and second antenna signals have the same polarity on first 111 and second 112 antenna ports, then s1(t)≅s2(t), while if the first and second antenna signal have opposite polarities on first 111 and second 112 antenna ports, then s1(t)≅s2(t).
As will be further exemplified below in connection with
The antenna system shown in
The switching unit 230 can be configured to alternate between states in a pre-determined schedule, or be configured to be manually controlled by an external control signal which determines the state of the switch. As a general rule of thumb, the switching of the switching unit 230 should be done as seldom as possible, e.g., with switching frequency kHz range, in order to obtain best performance of an attached low frequency radar system used in a synthetic aperture radar, SAR, application.
According to different aspects, the first and second common antenna signals are configured to be orthogonal in different ways. Here, orthogonal means that the first and second common antenna signals are separable and do not interfere significantly with each other during operation.
According to one such aspect, the first J1 and the second J2 common signal are orthogonal by separation in frequency, e.g., by means of frequency division duplex, FDD.
According to one such aspect, the first J1 and the second J2 common signal are orthogonal by separation in time, e.g., by means of time division duplex, TDD.
According to one such aspect, the first J1 and the second J2 common signal are orthogonal by separation in code, e.g., by means of band spreading by orthogonal codes.
The antenna structure 110′ is further arranged to have a ground plane 330 orthogonal to both legs and located approximately at the second end of the legs. Preferably, there is arranged a small separation between the legs 320 and said ground plane 300, as shown in
The antenna structure 110′ has a total length LTOT=LV1+LV2+LH, including elongated conductive bridge 310 and both legs 320 less than the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the first common antenna signal J1.
It should be noted that any references to sizes, frequencies, and wavelengths are to be construed as approximate. Thus, at least partial functionality of the antenna system is obtained even if dimensioned slightly outside of given lengths.
References will be made herein to a U-shape or U antenna, and to a Pi-shape or Pi antenna. The U-shape antenna corresponds to the antenna system 300 shown, e.g., in
Also, the lengths of the two parallel legs will at times herein be referred to by the common reference symbol LV, instead of LV1 and LV2. In such cases when the common reference symbol LV is used, the two legs are assumed to be of equal length, i.e., LV1=LV2=LV.
Basic to the present technique is an antenna element in the form of a conducting material bent in U shape. This U-shape, as shown in
When excited by, e.g., a radar transceiver, the U element will interact with its mirror image in the ground plane. If the length LV is chosen as a quarter of the free space wavelength of the antenna feeding signal, i.e., the common signal, and feeding the two legs of the U with the same polarity, each leg will behave as a monopole. This means that each leg constructively interacts with the ground plane mirror image to forma a half wavelength dipole. Keeping the bridge length LH shorter than half a wavelength means that the bridge will not provide any significant radiation contribution. Thus the radiation produced will be that of the monopole pair and will provide maximum radiation in the direction broadside to the U-shape 110′. There will be no significant radiation in the vertical direction. The electric field will always be substantially parallel to the legs of the U-shape 110′.
If on the other hand the two legs are fed with opposite polarity and 2LV+LH is half a wavelength of the U-shape 110′, the U-shape 110′ constructively interacts with its mirror image to form a magnetic dipole. For impedance matching reasons LH should not be too small but say that both LH and LV are on the order of a little less than quarter of a wavelength, then both the LV are close to quarter of a wavelength and 2LV+LH are close to half a wavelength meaning that the antenna has two efficient modes of excitation. A magnetic excitation will produce a radiation pattern where radiation is zero on the broadside of the U-shape 110′ and is maximum in the pane of the U. The magnetic field will always be parallel to the broadside direction.
The U-shape antenna shown in
A typical selection of frequency and bandwidth center frequency fC is chosen equal to bandwidth B and depending on application fC=55 MHz or fC=240 MHz. For these two choices one gets half of the smallest wavelength of the common antenna signal equal to approximately 1.8 meters and 0.4 meters, respectively. Typical choices of LV and LH can be 1 m and 0.25 m respectively.
The feature of the elongated conductive bridge 310 including extension units 410, 420 being smaller than the wavelength corresponding to the highest frequency of the common antenna signal advantageously prevents excitation of the bridge due to the bridge being on the order of a wavelength in size.
Note also the ground plane 330 of the antenna structure 110″, which ground plane 330 is shown in
The antenna structures in
The antenna structures in
Shown in
The present antenna system design comprises two modes of vehicle integration, one that exploits the U antenna as is, and the other a modification of the U antenna. Before discussing actual aircraft integration, this modification will be described, with reference to
When the legs of the Pi antenna are fed in phase, only the legs—behaving as monopoles—should be excited. No excitation of the bridge occurs. For this reason the extension units must not extend beyond a quarter of a wavelength. Applying the discussion above regarding acceptable bandwidth one finds that LV, LH and extension units should all be smaller than half of the smallest wavelength of the common antenna signal. Thus the total length of the bridge shall be less than the smallest wavelength. In the example above a total bridge length (including extension units) of 3 m for the low band and 0.75 m for the high band is conceivable.
By exciting the horizontal bridge at two separated points the full wavelength excitations of the resulting dipole are pushed to higher frequencies compared to a centrally fed dipole. Thus the separated feeds enable the antenna to be longer and thus more efficient without compromising the radiation pattern, which is an advantage of the present technique.
We finally mention certain preferred modes of aircraft integration of the Pi-shape and U-shape antenna types described above.
The ideal antenna illumination pattern for low frequency radar mapping should provide maximum radiation at approximately 30° depressed direction (with respect to the horizon) at right angles to the flight axis and either to the left or right. The direction should preferably be selectable. For the essentially dipole type of antennas considered here the beams are very wide and diffuse meaning that even though the maximum direction may point in another direction it may well be sufficient also at this ideal direction.
When integrating the antennas described here on an aircraft, the aircraft body is considered the ground plane. The conditions for this assumption to be valid is that the aircraft has dimension of many wavelengths and has good conductivity (if this should turn out not to be the case it must be painted with conductive paint). However, it may not be required that the antennas are installed on a continuous or flat area of the aircraft—also very irregular structures may serve the purpose of a ground plane (a typical case is that the underside of the landing skids of a helicopter may behave as a ground plane).
The airborne vehicles 710, 810 can, as shown in
Thus, according to an aspect, the length of the elongated bridge is approximately 1.2 meters, and the length of both legs is approximately 1 meter.
According to another aspect, the length of one of the legs is approximately 0 meters, thus substantially forming a single leg antenna system (not shown in
As seen in
As is exemplified in
Also, note that the Pi-shape antenna like the U-shape antenna with contra-polar feed has maximum radiation normal to the ground plane, i.e. in the downward direction in
Some radar applications derive resolution from the aircraft motion (so called synthetic aperture). Thus in contrast to radar in its simplest form the antenna directivity is not required for getting the angular resolution of the radar. However, a prerequisite for synthetic aperture principle to be applicable is that the radar responses only stem from one side of the aircraft. Thus, the antenna arrangement must allow any responses coming from the other side of the aircraft to be effectively suppressed.
Further, when the antenna is non-directive, the radar signal transmitted though the antenna will strongly couple to the metallic structure of the aircraft itself. This interaction cannot be efficiently handled unless antennas are allowed to geometrically extend from the aircraft by a distance of at least quarter of a wavelength order (herein meter order).
Thus, according to an aspect, the length of the elongated conductive bridge 310 with extension units 410, 420 is approximately 3 meters, and the length of each leg is approximately 1.2 meters.
According to one aspect, the antenna system of the present disclosure is adapted to be mounted on an airborne vehicle 710, 810.
According to another aspect, the antenna system 100, 200, 300, 400 is adapted to be mounted on a surface based vehicle.
According to an aspect, the airborne vehicle 710, 810 is arranged as a ground plane of the antenna system 100, 200, 300, 400.
According to an aspect, the antenna system 100, 200, 300, 400 is adapted to be mounted on an airborne vehicle 810 comprising first and second landing skids 820, the antenna system being arranged between the first and second landing skids 820.
Aspects of the disclosure are described with reference to the drawings, e.g., block diagrams and/or flowcharts. It is understood that several entities in the drawings, e.g., blocks of the block diagrams, and also combinations of entities in the drawings, can be implemented by computer program instructions, which instructions can be stored in a computer-readable memory, and also loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus. Such computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, a special purpose computer and/or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer and/or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the block diagrams and/or flowchart block or blocks.
In some implementations and according to some aspects of the disclosure, the functions or steps noted in the blocks can occur out of the order noted in the operational illustrations. For example, two blocks shown in succession can in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks can sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved. Also, the functions or steps noted in the blocks can according to some aspects of the disclosure be executed continuously in a loop.
In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed exemplary aspects of the disclosure. However, many variations and modifications can be made to these aspects without substantially departing from the principles of the present disclosure. Thus, the disclosure should be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive, and not as being limited to the particular aspects discussed above. Accordingly, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4006481, | Dec 10 1975 | The Ohio State University | Underground, time domain, electromagnetic reflectometry for digging apparatus |
4728897, | Oct 17 1984 | British Gas Corporation | Microwave reflection survey technique for determining depth and orientation of buried objects |
4733245, | Jun 23 1986 | Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp | Cavity-backed slot antenna |
4812850, | Mar 27 1986 | British Gas PLC | Method and apparatus for combining waveforms |
5568159, | May 12 1994 | McDonnell Douglas Corporation | Flared notch slot antenna |
6429802, | Dec 08 1998 | Geophysical Survey Systems | Determining the condition of a concrete structure using electromagnetic signals |
7170449, | Nov 05 2002 | 3D-RADAR AS | Antenna system for georadar |
7994999, | Nov 30 2007 | HARADA INDUSTRY OF AMERICA, INC | Microstrip antenna |
20040118313, | |||
20060049980, | |||
20070013582, | |||
20070024489, | |||
20070052576, | |||
20090195435, | |||
20100328137, | |||
20150042532, | |||
20150123838, | |||
20150276928, | |||
20150331097, | |||
WO2004042427, | |||
WO2014098660, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 12 2014 | Saab AB | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Sep 12 2016 | HELLSTEN, HANS | Saab AB | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 039873 | /0853 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 21 2020 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 22 2024 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 11 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 11 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 11 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 11 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 11 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 11 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 11 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 11 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 11 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 11 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 11 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 11 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |