A downhole sampling tool and related method are provided. The tool is provided with a main flowline for communicating fluid from the formation through the tool. A main valve is positioned in the main flowline and defines a first portion and a second portion of the main flowline. At least one sample chamber with a slidable piston therein defining a sample cavity and a buffer cavity is also provided. The sample cavity is in selective fluid communication with the first portion of the main flowline via a first flowline and with the second portion of the main flowline via a second flowline. fluid communication is selectively established between the sample cavity and the first and/or second portions of the main flowline for selectively flushing fluid through the sample cavity and/or collecting samples of the fluid therein. fluid may also be discharged from the buffer cavity via a third flowline.
|
20. A method for obtaining fluid from a subsurface formation penetrated by a wellbore, comprising:
positioning a formation testing apparatus within the wellbore, the testing apparatus comprising a sample chamber having a floating piston slidably positioned therein so as to define a sample cavity and a buffer cavity; establishing fluid communication between the apparatus and the formation; inducing movement of fluid from the formation through a main flowline in the apparatus; diverting fluid from the main flowline into the sample cavity via a first flowline; discharging fluid from the sample cavity via a second flowline whereby fluid is flushed from the sample cavity; and terminating the discharge of fluid from the sample cavity whereby a sample is collected in the sample cavity.
1. A downhole sampling tool positionable in a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation, comprising:
a main flowline extending through the downhole tool for conunonicating fluid obtained from the formation through the downhole tool; a main valve in the main flowline movable betwecn a closed and an open position, the valve defining a first portion and a second portion of the main flowline; at least one sample chamber have a slidable piston therein defining a sample cavity and a buffer cavity, the sample cavity in selective fluid communication with the first portion of the main flowline via a first flowline and in selective fluid communication with the second portion of the main flowline via a second flowline; wherein when the main valve is in the closed position, fluid communication is selectively established between the sample cavity and one of the first portion of the main flowline, the second portion of the main flowline and combinations thereof.
29. A downhole sampling tool positionable in a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation, comprising:
a probe assembly for establishing fluid communication between the apparatus and the formation when the apparatus is positioned in the wellbore; a pump assembly for drawing fluid from the formation into the apparatus via said probe assembly; a main flowline extending through the downhole tool for communicating fluid obtained from the formation through the downhole tool; a main valve in the main flowline movable between a closed and an open position, the valve defining a first portion and a second portion of the main flowline; and a sample module for collecting a sample of the formation fluid drawn from the formation by said pumping assembly, said sample module comprising: at least one sample chamber have a slidable piston therein defining a sample cavity and a buffer cavity, the sample cavity in selective fluid communication with the first portion of the main flowline via a first flowline and in selective fluid communication with the second portion of the main flowline via a second flowline; wherein when the main valve is in the closed position, fluid communication is selectively established between the sample cavity and one of the first portion of the main flowline, the second portion of the main flowline and combinations thereof. 2. The downhole sampling tool of
3. The downhole sampling tool of
4. The downhole sampling tool of
5. The downhole sampling tool of
6. The downhole sampling tool of
7. The downhole sampling tool of
8. The downhole sampling tool of
9. The downhole sampling tool of
10. The downhole sampling tool of
11. The downhole sampling tool of
12. The downhole sampling tool of
13. The downhole sampling tool of
14. The downhole sampling tool of
15. The downhole sampling tool of
17. The downhole sampling tool of
18. The downhole sampling tool of
19. The downhole sampling tool of
21. The method of
22. The method of
23. The method of
24. The method of
25. The method of
26. The method of
27. The method of
28. The method of
30. The downhole sampling tool of
|
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/960,570 filed on Sep. 20, 2001, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/712,373 U.S. Pat. No. 6,467,544 filed on Nov. 14, 2000.
This invention relates generally to sampling formation fluid from a wellbore. More specifically, the invention relates to reducing the contamination present in a sampling operation thereby providing a cleaner sample of formation fluids.
The desirability of taking downhole formation fluid samples for chemical and physical analysis has long been recognized by oil companies, and such sampling has been performed by the assignee of the present invention, Schlumberger, for many years. Samples of formation fluid, also known as reservoir fluid, are typically collected as early as possible in the life of a reservoir for analysis at the surface and, more particularly, in specialized laboratories. The information that such analysis provides is vital in the planning and development of hydrocarbon reservoirs, as well as in the assessment of a reservoir's capacity and performance.
The process of wellbore sampling involves the lowering of a sampling tool, such as the MDT™ formation testing tool, owned and provided by Schlumberger, into the wellbore to collect a sample or multiple samples of formation fluid by engagement between a probe member of the sampling tool and the wall of the wellbore. The sampling tool creates a pressure differential across such engagement to induce formation fluid flow into one or more sample chambers within the sampling tool. This and similar processes are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,860,581; 4,936,139 (both assigned to Schlumberger); 5,303,775; 5,377,755 (both assigned to Western Atlas); and 5,934,374 (assigned to Halliburton).
The desirability of housing at least one, and often a plurality, of such sample chambers, with associated valving and flow line connections, within "sample modules" is also known, and has been utilized to particular advantage in Schlumberger's MDT tool. Schlumberger currently has several types of such sample modules and sample chambers, each of which provide certain advantages for certain conditions.
"Dead volume" is a phrase used to indicate the volume that exits between the seal valve at the inlet to a sample cavity of a sample chamber and the sample cavity itself. In operation, this volume, along with the rest of the flow system in a sample chamber or chambers, is typically filled with a fluid, gas, or a vacuum (typically air below atmospheric pressure), although a vacuum is undesirable in many instances because it allows a large pressure drop when the seal valve is opened. Thus, many high quality samples are now taken using "low shock" techniques wherein the dead volume is almost always filled with a fluid, usually water. In any case, whatever is used to fill this dead volume is swept into and captured in the formation fluid sample when the sample is collected, thereby contaminating the sample.
The problem is illustrated in
It is, therefore, desirable to provide techniques for removing contamination from the downhole tool so that cleaner fluid samples may be captured. It is further desirable that such techniques apply to downhole tools with one or more sample chambers within the downhole tool, one or more sample chambers in the same sampling location within the downhole tool, and/or sample chambers located at any location in the downhole tool along the main flowline.
The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus that may solve or at least reduce, some or all of the problems described above.
The sample module can further comprise a second valve disposed in the first flowline between the second flowline and the third flowline, and the second flowline can be connected to the first flowline upstream of said second valve. The third flowline can be connected to the first flowline downstream of the second valve. There can also be a fourth flowline connected to the sample cavity of the sample chamber for communicating fluid out of the sample cavity. The fourth flowline can also be connected to the first flowline, whereby fluid preloaded in the sample cavity may be flushed out using formation fluid via the fourth flowline. In one particular embodiment, the fourth flowline is connected to the first flowline downstream of the second valve. A third valve can be disposed in the fourth flowline for controlling the flow of fluid through the fourth flowline. The sample module can be a wireline-conveyed formation testing tool. In exemplary embodiments of the invention the sample cavity and the buffer cavity have a pressure differential between them that is less than 50 psi. In other exemplary embodiments of the invention, the sample cavity and the buffer cavity have a pressure differential between them that is less than 25 psi and less than 5 psi.
An alternate embodiment comprises a sample module for obtaining fluid samples from a subsurface wellbore. The sample module comprising a sample chamber for receiving and storing pressurized fluid with a piston movably disposed in the chamber defining a sample cavity and a buffer cavity, the cavities having variable volumes determined by movement of the piston. A first flowline for communicating fluid obtained from a subsurface formation proceeds through the sample module along with a second flowline connecting the first flowline to the sample cavity. A third flowline is connects the first flowline to the buffer cavity of the sample chamber for communicating buffer fluid out of the buffer cavity. A first valve capable of moving between a closed position and an open position is disposed in the second flowline for communicating flow of fluid from the first flowline to the sample cavity. A second valve capable of moving between a closed position and an open position is disposed in the first flowline between the second flowline and the third flowline. When the first valve and the second valve are in the open position, the sample cavity and the buffer cavity are in fluid communication with the first flowline and therefore have approximately equivalent pressures. The sample cavity and the buffer cavity can have a pressure differential between them that is less than 50 psi, less than 25 psi or less than 5 psi.
In another embodiment, the invention is directed to an apparatus for obtaining fluid from a subsurface formation penetrated by a wellbore. The apparatus comprises a probe assembly for establishing fluid communication between the apparatus and the formation when the apparatus is positioned in the wellbore. A pump assembly is capable of drawing fluid from the formation into the apparatus via the probe assembly. A sample module is capable of collecting a sample of the formation fluid drawn from the formation by the pumping assembly. The sample module comprises a chamber for receiving and storing fluid and a piston slidably disposed in the chamber to define a sample cavity and a buffer cavity, the cavities having variable volumes determined by movement of the piston. A first flowline is in fluid communication with the pump assembly for communicating fluid obtained from the formation through the sample module. A second flowline connects the first flowline to the sample cavity and a first valve is disposed in the second flowline for controlling the flow of fluid from said first flowline to the sample cavity. When the first valve is in the open position, the sample cavity and the buffer cavity are in fluid communication with the first flowline and thereby have approximately equivalent pressures.
The apparatus can further comprise a second valve disposed in the first flowline between the second flowline and the third flowline. The second flowline can be connected to the first flowline upstream of the second valve, while the third flowline can be connected to the first flowline downstream of the second valve. A fourth flowline can be connected to the sample cavity of the sample chamber for communicating fluid into and out of the sample cavity. The fourth flowline can also be connected to the first flowline, whereby any fluid preloaded in the sample cavity can be flushed out using formation fluid via the fourth flowline. The fourth flowline can be connected to the first flowline downstream of the second valve and can comprise a third valve controlling the flow of fluid through the fourth flowline. The apparatus can be a wireline-conveyed formation testing tool.
The inventive apparatus is typically a wireline-conveyed formation testing tool, although the advantages of the present invention are also applicable to a logging-while-drilling (LWD) tool such as a formation tested carried in a drillstring. The pressure differential between the sample cavity and the buffer cavity can be less than 50 psi, less than 25 psi or less than 5 psi.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention can comprise a method for obtaining fluid from a subsurface formation penetrated by a wellbore. The method comprises positioning a formation testing apparatus within the wellbore, the testing apparatus comprising a sample chamber having a floating piston slidably positioned therein, so as to define a sample cavity and a buffer cavity. Fluid communication is established between the apparatus and the formation and movement of fluid from the formation through a first flowline in the apparatus is induced with a pump located downstream of the first flowline. Communication between the sample cavity and the first flowline, and between the buffer cavity and the first flowline are established whereby the sample cavity, buffer cavity and the first flowline have equivalent pressures. Buffer fluid is removed from the buffer cavity, thereby moving the piston within the sample chamber and delivering a sample of the formation fluid into the sample cavity of a sample chamber. The apparatus is then withdrawn from the wellbore to recover the collected sample.
The method can further comprise flushing out at least a portion of a fluid precharging the sample cavity by inducing movement of at least a portion of the formation fluid though the sample cavity and collecting a sample of the formation fluid within the sample cavity after the flushing step. The flushing step can be accomplished with flow lines leading into and out of the sample cavity. Each of the flow lines can be equipped with a seal valve for controlling fluid flow therethrough. The flushing step can include flushing the precharging fluid out to the borehole or into a primary flow line within the apparatus. The method can further comprise the step of maintaining the sample collected in the sample cavity in a single phase condition as the apparatus is withdrawn from the wellbore.
In one particular embodiment the formation fluid is drawn into the sample cavity by movement of the piston as the buffer fluid is withdrawn from the buffer cavity and the expelled buffer fluid is delivered to a primary flow line within the apparatus. The pressure differential between the sample cavity and the first flowline can be less than 50 psi, less than 25 psi, or less than 5 psi. The fluid movement from the formation into the apparatus can be induced by a probe assembly engaging the wall of the formation, and a pump assembly that is in fluid communication with the probe assembly, both assemblies being within the apparatus.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a downhole sampling tool positionable in a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation. The downhole tool comprises a main flowline extending through the downhole tool for communicating fluid obtained from the formation through the downhole tool. A main valve in the main flowline is movable between a closed and an open position. The valve defines a first portion and a second portion of the main flowline. At least one sample chamber has a slidable piston therein defining a sample cavity and a buffer cavity. The sample cavity is in selective fluid communication with the first portion of the main flowline via a first flowline and in selective fluid communication with the second portion of the main flowline via a second flowline. When the main valve is in the closed position, fluid communication is selectively established between the sample cavity and one of the first portion of the main flowline, the second portion of the main flowline and combinations thereof.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for obtaining fluid from a subsurface formation penetrated by a wellbore. The method comprises positioning a formation testing apparatus within the wellbore, the testing apparatus comprising a sample chamber having a floating piston slidably positioned therein so as to define a sample cavity and a buffer cavity. Fluid communication is established between the apparatus and the formation. The movement of fluid is induced from the formation through a main flowline in the apparatus. Fluid is diverted from the main flowline into the sample cavity via a first flowline. Fluid is discharged from the sample cavity via a second flowline whereby fluid is flushed from the sample cavity. The discharge of fluid from the sample cavity is terminated whereby a sample is collected in the sample cavity.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a downhole sampling tool positionable in a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation. The downhole sampling tool comprises a probe assembly for establishing fluid communication between the apparatus and the formation when the apparatus is positioned in the wellbore and a pump assembly for drawing fluid from the formation into the apparatus via said probe assembly. A main flowline extends through the downhole tool for communicating fluid obtained from the formation through the downhole tool. A main valve in the main flowline is movable between a closed and an open position. The valve defines a first portion and a second portion of the main flowline. The tool also comprises a sample module for collecting a sample of the formation fluid drawn from the formation by said pumping assembly. The module comprises at least one sample chamber have a slidable piston therein defining a sample cavity and a buffer cavity. The sample cavity is in selective fluid communication with the first portion of the main flowline via a first flowline and in selective fluid communication with the second portion of the main flowline via a second flowline. When the main valve is in the closed position, fluid communication is selectively established between the sample cavity and one of the first portion of the main flowline, the second portion of the main flowline and combinations thereof.
Other aspects of the invention will be further provided herein.
The manner in which the present invention attains the above recited features, advantages, and objects can be understood with greater clarity by reference to the preferred embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be noted however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Turning now to prior art
As shown in the embodiment of
The hydraulic power module C includes pump 16, reservoir 18, and motor 20 to control the operation of the pump 16. Low oil switch 22 also forms part of the control system and is used in regulating the operation of the pump 16.
The hydraulic fluid line 24 is connected to the discharge of the pump 16 and runs through hydraulic power module C and into adjacent modules for use as a hydraulic power source. In the embodiment shown in
The pump-out module M, seen in
The bi-directional piston pump 92, energized by hydraulic fluid from the pump 91, can be aligned to draw from the flow line 54 and dispose of the unwanted sample though flow line 95, or it may be aligned to pump fluid from the borehole (via flow line 95) to flow line 54. The pumpout module can also be configured where flowline 95 connects to the flowline 54 such that fluid may be drawn from the downstream portion of flowline 54 and pumped upstream or vice versa. The pump out module M has the necessary control devices to regulate the piston pump 92 and align the fluid line 54 with fluid line 95 to accomplish the pump out procedure. It should be noted here that piston pump 92 can be used to pump samples into the sample chamber module(s) S, including overpressuring such samples as desired, as well as to pump samples out of sample chamber module(s) S using the pump-out module M. The pump-out module M may also be used to accomplish constant pressure or constant rate injection if necessary. With sufficient power, the pump out module M may be used to inject fluid at high enough rates so as to enable creation of microfractures for stress measurement of the formation.
Alternatively, the straddle packers 28 and 30 shown in
As also shown in
Having inflated the packers 28 and 30 and/or set the probe 10 and/or the probes 12 and 14, the fluid withdrawal testing of the formation can begin. The sample flow line 54 extends from the probe 46 in the probe module E down to the outer periphery 32 at a point between the packers 28 and 30 through the adjacent modules and into the sample modules S. The vertical probe 10 and the sink probes 12 and 14 thus entry of formation fluids into the sample flow line 54 via one or more of a resistivity measurement cell 56, a pressure measurement device 58, and a pretest mechanism 59, according to the desired configuration. Also, the flowline 64 allows entry of formation fluids into the sample flowline 54. When using the module E, or multiple modules E and F, the isolation valve 62 is mounted downstream of the resistivity sensor 56. In the closed position, the isolation valve 62 limits the internal flow line volume, improving the accuracy of dynamic measurements made by the pressure gauge 58. After initial pressure tests are made, the isolation valve 62 can be opened to allow flow into the other modules via the flowline 54.
When taking initial samples, there is a high prospect that the formation fluid initially obtained is contaminated with mud cake and filtrate. It is desirable to purge such contaminants from the sample flow stream prior to collecting sample(s). Accordingly, the pump-out module M is used to initially purge from the apparatus A specimens of formation fluid taken through the inlet 64 of the straddle packers 28, 30, or vertical probe 10, or sink probes 12 or 14 into the flow line 54.
The fluid analysis module D includes an optical fluid analyzer 99, which is particularly suited for the purpose of indicating where the fluid in flow line 54 is acceptable for collecting a high quality sample. The optical fluid analyzer 99 is equipped to discriminate between various oils, gas, and water. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,994,671; 5,166,747; 5,939,717; and 5,956,132, as well as other known patents, all assigned to Schlumberger, describe the analyzer 99 in detail, and such description will not be repeated herein, but is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
While flushing out the contaminants from apparatus A, formation fluid can continue to flow through the sample flow line 54 which extends through adjacent modules such as the precision pressure module B, fluid analysis module D, pump out module M, flow control module N, and any number of sample chamber modules S that may be attached as shown in FIG. 3. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that by having a sample flow line 54 running the length of the various modules, multiple sample chamber modules S can be stacked without necessarily increasing the overall diameter of the tool. Alternatively, as explained below, a single sample module S may be equipped with a plurality of small diameter sample chambers, for example by locating such chambers side by side and equidistant from the axis of the sample module. The tool can therefore take more samples before having to be pulled to the surface and can be used in smaller bores.
Referring again to
The sample chamber module S can then be employed to collect a sample of the fluid delivered via the flow line 54 and regulated by the flow control module N, which is beneficial but not necessary for fluid sampling. With reference first to the upper sample chamber module S in
It should also be noted that buffer fluid in the form of full-pressure wellbore fluid may be applied to the backsides of the pistons in chambers 84 and 90 to further control the pressure of the formation fluid being delivered to the sample modules S. For this purpose, the valves 81 and 83 are opened, and the piston pump 92 of the pump-out module M must pump the fluid in the flow line 54 to a pressure exceeding wellbore pressure. It has been discovered that this action has the effect of dampening or reducing the pressure pulse or "shock" experienced during drawdown. This low shock sampling method has been used to particular advantage in obtaining fluid samples from unconsolidated formations, plus it allows overpressuring of the sample fluid via piston pump 92.
It is known that various configurations of the apparatus A can be employed depending upon the objective to be accomplished. For basic sampling, the hydraulic power module C can be used in combination with the electric power module L, probe module E and multiple sample chamber modules S. For reservoir pressure determination, the hydraulic power module C can be used with the electric power module L, probe module E and precision pressure module B. For uncontaminated sampling at reservoir conditions, the hydraulic power module C can be used with the electric power module L, probe module E in conjunction with fluid analysis module D, pump-out module M and multiple sample chamber modules S. A simulated Drill Stem Test (DST) test can be run by combining the electric power module L with the packer module P, and the precision pressure module B and the sample chamber modules S. Other configurations are also possible and the makeup of such configurations also depends upon the objectives to be accomplished with the tool. The tool can be of unitary construction a well as modular, however, the modular construction allows greater flexibility and lower cost to users not requiring all attributes.
As mentioned above, the sample flow line 54 also extends through a precision pressure module B. The precision gauge 98 of module B may be mounted as close to probes 12, 14 or 46, and/or to inlet flowline 32, as possible to reduce internal flow line length which, due to fluid compressibility, may affect pressure measurement responsiveness. The precision gauge 98 is typically more sensitive than the strain gauge 58 for more accurate pressure measurements with respect to time. The gauge 98 is preferably a quartz pressure gauge that performs the pressure measurement through the temperature and pressure dependent frequency characteristics of a quartz crystal, which is known to be more accurate than the comparatively simple strain measurement that a strain gauge employs. Suitable valving of the control mechanisms can also be employed to stagger the operation of the gauge 98 and the gauge 58 to take advantage of their difference in sensitivities and abilities to tolerate pressure differentials.
The individual modules of the apparatus A are constructed so that they quickly connect to each other. Preferably, flush connections between the modules are used in lieu of male/female connections to avoid points where contaminants, common in a wellsite environment, may be trapped.
Flow control during sample collection allows different flow rates to be used. Flow control is useful in getting meaningful formation fluid samples as quickly as possible which minimizes the chance of binding the wireline and/or the tool because of mud oozing into the formation in high permeability situations. In low permeability situations, flow control is very helpful to prevent drawing formation fluid sample pressure below its bubble point or asphaltene precipitation point.
More particularly, the "low shock sampling" method described above is useful for reducing to a minimum the pressure drop in the formation fluid during drawdown so as to minimize the "shock" on the formation. By sampling at the smallest achievable pressure drop, the likelihood of keeping the formation fluid pressure above asphaltene precipitation point pressure as well as above bubble point pressure is also increased. In one method of achieving the objective of a minimum pressure drop, the sample chamber is maintained at wellbore hydrostatic pressure as described above, and the rate of drawing connate fluid into the tool is controlled by monitoring the tool's inlet flow line pressure via gauge 58 and adjusting the formation fluid flowrate via pump 92 and/or flow control module N to induce only the minimum drop in the monitored pressure that produces fluid flow from the formation. In this manner, the pressure drop is minimized through regulation of the formation fluid flowrate.
Turning now to
A first seal valve 118 is disposed in the second flowline 114 for controlling the flow of fluid from the first flowline 54 to the sample cavity 110c. A second seal valve 120 is disposed in the third flowline 116 for controlling the flow of fluid out of the sample cavity 110c. Given this setup, any fluid preloaded in the "dead volume" defined by the sample cavity 110c and the portions of the flowlines 114 and 116 that are sealed off by the seal valves 118 and 120, respectively, may be flushed therefrom using the formation fluid in the first flowline 54 and the seal valves 118 and 120.
Typically, a fluid such as water will fill the dead volume space between the seal valves 118 and 120 to minimize the pressure drop that the formation fluid experiences when the seal valves 118, 120 are opened. When it is desired to capture a sample of the formation fluid in the sample cavity 110c of the sample chamber 110, and the analyzer 99 indicates the fluid is substantially free of contaminants, the first step will be to flush the water (although other fluids may be used, water will be described hereinafter) out of the dead volume space. This is accomplished, as seen in
After a short period of flushing, the second seal valve 120 is closed, as shown in
Once sample cavity 110c is adequately filled, the first seal valve 118 is closed to capture the formation fluid sample in the sample cavity. Because the buffer fluid in cavity 110p is in contact with the borehole in this embodiment of the present invention, the formation fluid must be raised to a pressure above hydrostatic pressure in order to move the piston 112 and fill the sample cavity 110c. This is the low shock sampling method described above. After piston 112 reaches it's maximum travel, the pump module M raises the pressure of the fluid in the sample cavity 110c to some desirable level above hydrostatic pressure prior to shutting the first seal valve 118, thereby capturing a sample of formation fluid at a pressure above hydrostatic pressure. This "captured" position is illustrated in FIG. 4D.
The various modules of tool A have the capability of being placed above or below the module (for example, module E, F, and/or P of
The embodiments of
The present invention may be further equipped in certain embodiments, as shown in
A fifth flowline 126 is connected to the fourth flowline 124 and to the first flowline 54, the latter connection being upstream of the connection between the first flowline 54 and the second flowline 114. The fourth flowline 124 and the fifth flowline 126 permit manipulation of the buffer fluid to create a pressure differential across the piston 112 for selectively drawing a fluid sample into the sample cavity 110c. This process will be explained further below with reference to
The buffer fluid is routed to the first flowline 54 both above the flowline seal valve 122 and below the flowline seal valve 122 via the flowlines 124 and 126. Depending on whether the formation fluid is flowing from top to bottom (as shown in
When a sample of formation fluid is desired, the first step again is to flush out the dead volume fluid between the fist and second seal valves 118 and 120. This step is shown in
After a short period of flushing, the second seal valve 120 is closed as seen in FIG. 6C. The formation fluid then fills the sample cavity 110c and the buffer fluid in the buffer cavity 110p is displaced by the piston 112 into the flowline 54 via the fourth flowline 124 and the open manual valve 128. Because the buffer fluid is now flowing through the first flowline 54, it can communicate with other modules of the tool A. The flow control module N can be used to control the flow rate of the buffer fluid as it exits the sample chamber 110. Alternatively, by placing the pump module M below the sample module SM, it can be used to draw the buffer fluid out of the sample chamber, thereby reducing the pressure in the sample cavity 110c and drawing formation fluid into the sample cavity (described further below). Still further, a standard sample chamber with an air cushion can be used as the exit port for the buffer fluid in the event that the pump module fails. Also, the flowline 54 can communicate with the borehole, thereby reestablishing the above-described low shock sampling method.
Once the sample chamber 110c is filled and the piston 112 reaches its upper limiting position, as shown in
The low shock sampling method has been established as a way to minimize the amount of pressure drop on the formation fluid when a sample of this fluid is collected. As stated above, the way this is normally done is to configure the sample chamber 110 so that borehole fluid at hydrostatic pressure is in direct communication with the piston 112 via the buffer cavity 110p. A pump of some sort, such as the piston pump 92 of pump module M, is used to reduce the pressure of the port which communicates with the reservoir, thereby inducing flow of the formation or formation fluid into the tool A. Pump module M is placed between the reservoir sampling point and the sample module SM. When it is desired to take a sample, the formation fluid is diverted into the sample chamber. Since the piston 112 of the sample chamber is being acted upon by hydrostatic pressure, the pump must increase the pressure of the formation fluid to at least hydrostatic pressure in order to fill the sample cavity 110c. After the sample cavity is full, the pump can be used to increase the pressure of the formation fluid even higher than hydrostatic pressure in order to mitigate the effects of pressure loss through cooling of the formation fluid when it is brought to surface.
Thus, in low shock sampling, the pump module M must lower the pressure at the reservoir interface and then raise the pressure at the pump discharge or outlet to at least hydrostatic pressure. The formation fluid, however, must pass through the pump module to accomplish this. This is a concern, because the pump module may have extra pressure drops associated with it that are not witnessed at the wellbore wall due to check valves, relief valves, porting, and the like. These extraneous pressure drops could have an adverse affect on the integrity of the sample, especially if the drawdown pressure is near the bubble point or asphaltene drop-out point of the formation fluid.
Because of these concerns, a new methodology for sampling that incorporates the advantages of the present invention is now proposed. This involves using the pump module M to reduce the pressure at the reservoir interface as described above. However, the sample module SM is placed between the sampling point and the pump module.
Seal valve 132 on the buffer fluid can be used to ensure that the piston 112 in the sample chamber 110 does not move during the flushing of the sample cavity. In the embodiment of
The method of sampling with the embodiment of
Once the sample cavity 110c is full, the first seal valve 118 is closed, the buffer seal valve 132 is closed, and the third flowline seal valve 122 is opened so that pumping and flow through the flowline 54 can continue. To pressurize the formation fluid with gas charge module GM, the fifth seal valve 134 is opened thereby communicating the charge fluid to the buffer cavity 110p. Valve 134 remains open as the tool is brought to the surface, thereby maintaining the formation fluid at a higher pressure in the sample cavity 110c even as the sample chamber 110 cools. An alternative tool and method to using a fifth seal valve 134 to actuate the charge fluid in the gas module GM has been developed by Oilphase, a division of Schlumberger, and is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,822, which is incorporated herein by reference. In this tool and method, through valving within the sample chamber of bottle 110 itself closes off the buffer and sampling ports and then opens a port to the charge fluid, thereby pressurizing the sample.
Even if there is no gas charge module present in the embodiment illustrated in
When a sample is desired, the seal valve 118 of the sample module SM is opened as illustrated by FIG. 9B. This causes a portion of the formation fluid in flowline 54 to be diverted through the seal valve 118 and into the sample cavity 110c. There is typically a check valve mechanism (not shown) located on the outlet of the buffer cavity 110p in the various embodiments of the present invention. To provide direct communication between the flowline 54 and the fluid in the buffer cavity 110p, the check mechanism should be removed. With the check mechanism removed, the pressure in the flowline 54 will be approximately equal with the pressure within the buffer cavity 110p of the sample chamber 110.
The terms "equalize", "equivalent pressure", "approximately equivalent pressure" and other like terms within the present application are used to describe relative pressures between two locations within a flowline or an apparatus. It is well known that fluid flows will be subject to frictional pressure losses while flowing unrestricted through a flowline, these ordinary and slight pressure differences are not considered significant within the scope of this application. Therefore within this application, two locations in a system that are in fluid communication with each other and are capable of unrestricted fluid movement between the two locations will be considered to be of equivalent pressure to each other. In some embodiments of the present invention an equivalent pressure between the sample cavity 110c and the buffer cavity 110p is one that has a differential pressure of less than 50 psi. In other embodiments of the present invention an equivalent pressure between the sample cavity 110c and the buffer cavity 110p is one that has a differential pressure of less than 25 psi. In yet another embodiment of the present invention an equivalent pressure between the sample cavity 110c and the buffer cavity 110p is one that has a differential pressure of less than 10 psi. In still other embodiments of the present invention an equivalent pressure between the sample cavity 110c and the buffer cavity 110p is one that has a differential pressure of less than 5 psi. In yet other embodiments of the present invention an equivalent pressure between the sample cavity 110c and the buffer cavity 110p is one that has a differential pressure of less than 2 psi.
The pump module M then has communication with the buffer fluid in the buffer cavity 110p in addition to the fluid within the flowline 54. Since the manual valve 130 is open, the buffer fluid within the buffer cavity 110p will have the approximately equivalent pressure as the fluid within the flowline 54. The buffer fluid can then be removed from buffer cavity 110p via the pump module M, whose outlet returns to the borehole at the hydrostatic pressure of the well. As fluid is removed from the buffer cavity 110p, the piston 112 will move, thereby drawing formation fluid into the sample cavity 110c as shown in FIG. 9C.
Since the seal valve 118 and the manual valve 130 remain in an open position, the pressure within the sample chamber 110 remains approximately equal to the flowline 54 pressure during the pumpout and the sampling operations. There can be a differential pressure across the open seal valve 122 resulting from the flow of fluids in the flowline 54 passing through the restriction of the open or partially open seal valve 112. This differential pressure can provide a driving force for fluid to enter the sample cavity 110c, while the sample cavity 110c and the buffer cavity 110p remain at approximately equivalent pressures. This provides a low shock sampling method that has the added benefit that the sample fluid does not need to pass through the pump module M prior to isolation within the sample chamber 110.
When the sample cavity 110c is full, the closing of seal valve 118, as shown in
Pump module M is used to pump formation fluid through the tool A via the flowline 54 and the open seal valve 122 as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The flowline 222 fluidly connects sample cavity 214c of sample chamber 214 to flowline 54. Flowline 226 fluidly connects sample cavity 214c to sample cavity 216c of sample chamber 216. Flowline 228 fluidly connects sample cavity 216c to sample cavity 218c of sample chamber 218. Flowline 220 fluidly connects sample cavity 218c back to flowline 54 thereby completing the circuit. Seal valves 122, 224, and 230 are positioned in flowlines 54, 222 and 220, respectively for selectively allowing fluid to flow therethrough. The sample chambers 214, 216 and 218 each have a piston 214a, 216a and 218a which separate the buffer fluid cavities 214b, 216b and 218b from a sample cavities 214c, 216c and 218c, respectively.
Referring to
The flowlines 238, 246 and 252 fluidly connect sample cavities 232c, 234c and 236c of sample chamber 232, 234 and 236, respectively, to flowline 54 at a position between valve 122 and the reservoir 200. Flowlines 242, 250 and 256 fluidly connect sample cavities 232c, 234c and 236c of sample chamber 232, 234 and 236, respectively, to flowline 245. Flowline 245 is fluidly connected to flowline 54 at a position between valve 122 and the other modules 202. Valves 122 and 244 are positioned in flowlines 54 and 245, respectively for selectively allowing fluid to flow therethrough. Valves 240, 248 and 254 are positioned in flowlines 238, 246 and 252, respectively, for selectively allowing fluid to flow therethrough. The sample chambers 232, 234 and 236 each have a piston 232a, 234a and 236a which separate the buffer fluid cavity 232b, 234b and 236b from a sample cavity 232c, 234c and 236c, respectively.
Referring to
The flowlines 278, 282 and 286 fluidly connect sample cavities 260c, 262c and 264c of sample chamber 260, 262 and 264, respectively, to flowline 54. Flowlines 280, 284 and 288 fluidly connect sample cavities 260c, 262c and 264c of sample chamber 260, 262 and 264, respectively, to flowline 290. Valves 266, 268 and 270 are positioned in flowlines 278, 268 and 270, respectively, for selectively allowing fluid to flow therethrough. Valves 272, 274 and 276 are positioned in flowlines 280, 284 and 288, respectively, for selectively allowing fluid to flow therethrough. The sample chambers 260, 262 and 264 each have a piston 260a, 262a and 264a which separate a buffer fluid cavity 260b, 262b and 264b from a sample cavity 260c, 262c and 264c, respectively. Flowline 289 fluidly connects buffer chambers 260b, 262b and 264b to the borehole.
Referring to
In the embodiment of
In
In the embodiment of
Referring to
In
The sample chamber 330 includes a sample cavity 330c adapted for collecting a formation fluid sample and a buffer cavity 330p containing a buffer fluid separated by a movable piston 330a. Buffer flowline 302 fluidly connects the buffer chamber 330b via flowline 302a to main flowline 54 at a position between valve 122 and reservoir 200, and via flowline 302b to main flowline 54 at a position between valve 122 and other modules 202. Valve 336 is positioned along flowline 302a and valve 338 is positioned along flowline 302b to selectively allow fluid to flow through the flowlines. One or more of the valves, such as valves 336 and 338, may be manually pre-set in the open or closed position prior to sending the tool downhole for performing downhole operations.
As shown in
In
Referring to
In the embodiments of
The sample chambers 350, 352 and 354 include sample cavities 350c, 352c and 354c, respectively, adapted for collecting a formation fluid sample, and buffer cavities 350b, 352b and 354b containing a buffer fluid separated by movable pistons 350a, 352a and 354a. Buffer flowlines 351, 353 and 355 fluidly connect the buffer 350c, 352c and 354c, respectively, to flowline 357. Flowline 357 is fluidly connected via flowline 357a to main flowline 54 at a position between valve 122 and other modules 202, and via flowline 357b to main flowline 54 at a position between valve 122 and other reservoir 200.
In the embodiments of
In the embodiments of
The apparatuses and methods described herein are not limited to the specific embodiments contained herein and encompass various combinations of the configurations described. For example, one or more of the sample chambers of
As will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may easily be produced in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The present embodiment is, therefore, to be considered as merely illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the claims that follow rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalence of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Brown, Jonathan W., Bolze, Victor M.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10114002, | Dec 22 2014 | TOTAL ANALYTICAL CONSULTING INC | Hydraulically coupled dual floating piston apparatus and methods of using same for sampling high pressure fluids |
10294783, | Oct 23 2012 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Selectable size sampling apparatus, systems, and methods |
11125082, | Jul 20 2015 | PIETRO FIORENTINI USA, INC | Systems and methods for monitoring changes in a formation while dynamically flowing fluids |
7195063, | Oct 15 2003 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole sampling apparatus and method for using same |
7216533, | May 21 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Methods for using a formation tester |
7243537, | Mar 01 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Methods for measuring a formation supercharge pressure |
7260985, | May 21 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Formation tester tool assembly and methods of use |
7261168, | May 21 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Methods and apparatus for using formation property data |
7428925, | Nov 21 2005 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wellbore formation evaluation system and method |
7464755, | Dec 12 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for sampling heavy oil reservoirs |
7546885, | May 19 2005 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for obtaining downhole samples |
7565835, | Nov 17 2004 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for balanced pressure sampling |
7584786, | Oct 07 2004 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for formation evaluation |
7603897, | May 21 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Downhole probe assembly |
7621325, | Sep 19 2001 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Dual piston, single phase sampling mechanism and procedure |
7644610, | Aug 24 2007 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Automated formation fluid clean-up to sampling switchover |
7793713, | Oct 07 2004 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for formation evaluation |
7878244, | Dec 28 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods to perform focused sampling of reservoir fluid |
7913554, | Nov 15 2005 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for balanced pressure sampling |
8047286, | Jun 28 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Formation evaluation system and method |
8146660, | Nov 13 2008 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Coiled tubing deployed single phase fluid sampling apparatus and method for use of same |
8210260, | Jun 28 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Single pump focused sampling |
8215389, | Oct 07 2004 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for formation evaluation |
8215390, | Nov 13 2008 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Coiled tubing deployed single phase fluid sampling apparatus and method for use of same |
8215391, | Nov 13 2008 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Coiled tubing deployed single phase fluid sampling apparatus and method for use of same |
8403042, | Jul 14 2010 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for use with downhole tools having gas-filled cavities |
8429961, | Nov 07 2005 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Wireline conveyed single phase fluid sampling apparatus and method for use of same |
8555968, | Jun 28 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Formation evaluation system and method |
8899323, | Jun 28 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Modular pumpouts and flowline architecture |
9057250, | Jun 28 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Formation evaluation system and method |
9303509, | Jan 20 2010 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Single pump focused sampling |
9581580, | Sep 27 2007 | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Measurement tool and method of use |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3385364, | |||
3969937, | Oct 24 1974 | Halliburton Company | Method and apparatus for testing wells |
4434653, | Jul 15 1982 | WESTERN ATLAS INTERNATIONAL, INC , | Apparatus for testing earth formations |
4703799, | Jan 03 1986 | MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A CORP OF NY | Technique for improving gravel pack operations in deviated wellbores |
4745802, | Sep 18 1986 | Halliburton Company | Formation testing tool and method of obtaining post-test drawdown and pressure readings |
4860581, | Sep 23 1988 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Down hole tool for determination of formation properties |
4879900, | Jul 05 1988 | Halliburton Logging Services, Inc. | Hydraulic system in formation test tools having a hydraulic pad pressure priority system and high speed extension of the setting pistons |
4936139, | Sep 23 1988 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Down hole method for determination of formation properties |
4994671, | Dec 23 1987 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for analyzing the composition of formation fluids |
5056595, | Aug 13 1990 | Gas Research Institute | Wireline formation test tool with jet perforator for positively establishing fluidic communication with subsurface formation to be tested |
5166747, | Jun 01 1990 | SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, A CORP OF TX | Apparatus and method for analyzing the composition of formation fluids |
5269180, | Sep 17 1991 | Schlumberger Technology Corp.; SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION A CORP OF TEXAS | Borehole tool, procedures, and interpretation for making permeability measurements of subsurface formations |
5303775, | Nov 16 1992 | BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC ; Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for acquiring and processing subsurface samples of connate fluid |
5337822, | Feb 15 1990 | Well fluid sampling tool | |
5377755, | Nov 16 1992 | Western Atlas International, Inc.; Western Atlas International, Inc | Method and apparatus for acquiring and processing subsurface samples of connate fluid |
5609205, | Jan 07 1992 | Well fluid sampling tool | |
5644076, | Mar 14 1996 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Wireline formation tester supercharge correction method |
5662166, | Oct 23 1995 | Apparatus for maintaining at least bottom hole pressure of a fluid sample upon retrieval from an earth bore | |
5890549, | Dec 23 1996 | FORMATION PRESERVATION, INC | Well drilling system with closed circulation of gas drilling fluid and fire suppression apparatus |
5901788, | Oct 16 1995 | Oilphase Sampling Services Limited | Well fluid sampling tool and well fluid sampling method |
5934374, | Aug 01 1996 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Formation tester with improved sample collection system |
5939717, | Jan 29 1998 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for determining gas-oil ratio in a geological formation through the use of spectroscopy |
5956132, | May 22 1996 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for optically discriminating between the phases of a three-phase fluid |
6216804, | Jul 29 1998 | JAPAN OIL, GAS AND METALS NATIONAL CORPORATION | Apparatus for recovering core samples under pressure |
6328103, | Aug 19 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Methods and apparatus for downhole completion cleanup |
6378631, | Jul 29 1998 | JAPAN OIL, GAS AND METALS NATIONAL CORPORATION | Apparatus for recovering core samples at in situ conditions |
EP791723, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 31 2002 | BOLZE, VICTOR M | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013216 | /0662 | |
Oct 31 2002 | BROWN, JONATHAN W | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013216 | /0662 | |
Nov 01 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 08 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 01 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 17 2015 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 30 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 30 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 30 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 30 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 30 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 30 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 30 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 30 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 30 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 30 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 30 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 30 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |